Jump to content

why nothing like tars in dcs ?


wolf_288
 Share

Recommended Posts

TARS already exists and works. Why would the Devs spend time on it when there are so many other things that actually 'need' fixing?

ASUS ROG Maximus VIII Hero, i7-6700K, Noctua NH-D14 Cooler, Crucial 32GB DDR4 2133, Samsung 950 Pro NVMe 256GB, Samsung EVO 250GB & 500GB SSD, 2TB Caviar Black, Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme 8GB, Corsair HX1000i, Phillips BDM4065UC 40" 4k monitor, VX2258 TouchScreen, TIR 5 w/ProClip, TM Warthog, VKB Gladiator Pro, Saitek X56, et. al., MFG Crosswind Pedals #1199, VolairSim Pit, Rift CV1 :thumbup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think, he means a integrated solution = ingame voice tool. So you don't need an extra tool (and export data) or TS3.

 

I hope, there will be a DCS modul (maybe TARS) to bring us these features. I would pay for an integrated solution. :smartass:

 

 

regards,

Fire

Hardware: Intel i5 4670K | Zalman NPS9900MAX | GeIL 16GB @1333MHz | Asrock Z97 Pro4 | Sapphire Radeon R9 380X Nitro | Samsung SSDs 840 series 120GB & 250 GB | Samsung HD204UI 2TB | be quiet! Pure Power 530W | Aerocool RS-9 Devil Red | Samsung SyncMaster SA350 24" + ASUS VE198S 19" | Saitek X52 | TrackIR 5 | Thrustmaster MFD Cougar | Speedlink Darksky LED | Razor Diamondback | Razor X-Mat Control | SoundBlaster Tactic 3D Rage ### Software: Windows 10 Pro 64Bit

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TARS leverages an existing, developed, and optimized VOIP technology (Teamspeak 3). An integrated version would require inhouse development of the same, or licensing TS3 for commercial use--both of which are expensive.

 

You can always help the TARS project by donating. I'm currently working on the SDK so people like Dart and other third parties can use it in their projects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personaly dont like TARS , whilst being more realistic , it also removes the human side of enjoyment in my view .

 

Having to be on the correct channel , to speak to someone . Then you get shot up and eject or CTD and all coms are gone .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
TARS already exists and works. Why would the Devs spend time on it when there are so many other things that actually 'need' fixing?

 

Mine doesn't, never has, even though its all been done correctly. Any issues with TARS on DCS v1.2.7 and TS3 v3.0.10.1 ? I would give anything to get mine working. The guys in my SQDN had problems too. What are we doing wrong? Is anyone willing to get on TS3 next Friday night and help us get it working?

 

:doh:

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even some games (such as Call of Duty or Red Orchestra etc.) have inter voice comm. feature.

DCS must have got this many many versions ago!

i7-2600 @3.4GHz | Corsair 16GB @1600MHz. | MSI GTX1660Ti Gaming X | Samsung 256GB SSD (Win7HPx64)
Samsung 32" | Saitek X-55 Rhino & Rudder | Trustmaster MFD Cougars & 2 x 8"TFTs | Logitech G13, G230, G510, PZ55 SwitchPanel & Farming Sim Panel | TIR5
>>MY MODS<< | Discord: Devrim#1068

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
Even some games (such as Call of Duty or Red Orchestra etc.) have inter voice comm. feature.

DCS must have got this many many versions ago!

 

 

Yes, yes... But they didn't :( DCS is long overdue. We need in-game comms that are properly simulated. If TARS can do it, then it shouldn't bee too hard at all. Why have they not done this yet?

  • Like 1

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In fact, why doesn't ED just integrate TARS into DCS. They could make it work with DCS from the core and maybe make it more stable. We should have had an accurate comms feature from the start, or at the very least added by now.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like IVC in BMS.

i7-4820k @ 3.7, Windows 7 64-bit, 16GB 1866mhz EVGA GTX 970 2GB, 256GB SSD, 500GB WD, TM Warthog, TM Cougar MFD's, Saitek Combat Pedals, TrackIR 5, G15 keyboard, 55" 4K LED

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which it works great and sounds good, thanks to Teamspeak.

i7-4820k @ 3.7, Windows 7 64-bit, 16GB 1866mhz EVGA GTX 970 2GB, 256GB SSD, 500GB WD, TM Warthog, TM Cougar MFD's, Saitek Combat Pedals, TrackIR 5, G15 keyboard, 55" 4K LED

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im happy there is no TARS ..... I know it adds to reality and immersion but , for me anyway , I have enough to do without changing radio channels every 30 seconds .

 

Why would you have to change that often? :D

i7-4820k @ 3.7, Windows 7 64-bit, 16GB 1866mhz EVGA GTX 970 2GB, 256GB SSD, 500GB WD, TM Warthog, TM Cougar MFD's, Saitek Combat Pedals, TrackIR 5, G15 keyboard, 55" 4K LED

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Integrated TARS would be great.

HP G2 Reverb, Windows VR setting: IPD is 64.5mm, High image quality, 90Hz refresh rate. Steam: VR SS set to 50%, motionReprojectionMode set to "motionreproduction" and Locked in at 45 Hz display,

DCS: Pixel Density 1.0, Forced IPD at 55 (perceived world size), 2 X MSAA, 0 X SSAA. My real IPD is 64.5mm. Prescription VROptition lenses installed. VR Driver system: I9-9900KS 5Ghz CPU. XI Hero motherboard and 2080ti graphics card, 32 gigs Ram

No OC at the mo. Vaicom user.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why nothing like tars in dcs ?

 

No one changes every 30 secs lol, you might change once or twice per flight. Some of us are building scale pits and want the radios to work. Otherwise why build them. This is something that needs to be done. When flying online with many people. One channel becomes crowded and it's very sloppy. Don't say you are happy there's no TARS because there won't ever be any hope of added radio realism, just don't use it, lol. Use the EASY COMMUNICATION option... You'll get better as time goes by and you practice. There are those of us that want the added realism, and we aren't overwhelmed, yet ;)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In fact, why doesn't ED just integrate TARS into DCS. They could make it work with DCS from the core and maybe make it more stable. We should have had an accurate comms feature from the start, or at the very least added by now.

 

As said above, TARS needs Teamspeak to work so ED would have to build their own replacement for Teamspeak.

ASUS ROG Maximus VIII Hero, i7-6700K, Noctua NH-D14 Cooler, Crucial 32GB DDR4 2133, Samsung 950 Pro NVMe 256GB, Samsung EVO 250GB & 500GB SSD, 2TB Caviar Black, Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme 8GB, Corsair HX1000i, Phillips BDM4065UC 40" 4k monitor, VX2258 TouchScreen, TIR 5 w/ProClip, TM Warthog, VKB Gladiator Pro, Saitek X56, et. al., MFG Crosswind Pedals #1199, VolairSim Pit, Rift CV1 :thumbup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is not that easy. TEAMSPEAK requires a Teamspeak server to manage the communication connection. It requires additional bandwidth for that. Not much, but still a little bit... I'm not sure how many connections a normal internet connection can handle in addition to the dcs server traffic to the clients. To have a separate TS server is an advantage, maybe.

I guess integrating just TARS is not a good idea for a company like ED. Recent update of TS client broke lots of plugins, so ED would be dependant on another company there.

And when Teamspeak will change their licensing model to commercial-only we need a change to dcs comms again.

Maybe not as easy as it seems.

 

Just my 2 cent.

Shagrat

 

- Flying Sims since 1984 -:pilotfly:

Win 10 | i5 10600K@4.1GHz | 32GB | GeForce RTX 2080S - Acer XB280HK 28" 4k | TrackIR5 | Simshaker & Jetseat | VIRPIL CM 50 Stick & Throttle | MFG Crosswind Rudder Pedals | TM Cougar MFDs | a hand made UFC | AHCP | 2x Elgato StreamDeck (Buttons galore)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even some games (such as Call of Duty or Red Orchestra etc.) have inter voice comm. feature.

DCS must have got this many many versions ago!

 

That you'd actually compare the data transmission requirements of simple FPS titles to the nature of what DCS is handling in the back end tells folks all they need to know.

 

Seriously- large AI counts bring servers to their knees in conjunction with the client side requirements. And you want to toss dedicated voice chat in there?

 

Just... wow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or they could make it work through existing teamspeak...

 

Please think through the licensing and support issues that would require.

ASUS ROG Maximus VIII Hero, i7-6700K, Noctua NH-D14 Cooler, Crucial 32GB DDR4 2133, Samsung 950 Pro NVMe 256GB, Samsung EVO 250GB & 500GB SSD, 2TB Caviar Black, Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme 8GB, Corsair HX1000i, Phillips BDM4065UC 40" 4k monitor, VX2258 TouchScreen, TIR 5 w/ProClip, TM Warthog, VKB Gladiator Pro, Saitek X56, et. al., MFG Crosswind Pedals #1199, VolairSim Pit, Rift CV1 :thumbup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously- large AI counts bring servers to their knees in conjunction with the client side requirements. And you want to toss dedicated voice chat in there?

 

Just... wow.

 

IVC works perfect for bms. And when e.g. squadons flying DCS online they are also on a teamspeack server. So I do not see a bandwith issue here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IVC works perfect for bms. And when e.g. squadons flying DCS online they are also on a teamspeack server. So I do not see a bandwith issue here.

 

 

I agree. But you can't tell them anything bro...

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...