Alfa Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Yes you are correct, I ment to write carriers, late night brainfart. Ok :) Yes I read the whole thing, what is your point? Did I claim that there is a mention that prohobitis aircraft carriers specificly? No not specifically, but the bit you quoted did say; "In the case of non-Black Sea powers, these terms make it impossible for transit any modern ships carrying aircraft through the straits without violating the terms of the convention." I was just noting that there is no reference to the "carriage of aircraft" or the specific term of "aircraft carrier"" in the treaty - only to displacement which the above bit didn't mention. Anyway, this was not really in response to what you wrote, but rather to some general die-hard misconceptions about the treaty vs. aircraft carriers - e.g. that the Soviet Union should have re-labelled their carriers as "aircraft carrying cruisers" in order to bypass the treaty restrictions....which is nonsense for several reasons: a). because there is no restriction pertaining to the specific term of "aircraft carrier"(so nothing gained by calling them something else). b). because even if there was, it would not apply to the Soviet Union anyway since it was a Black Sea power and therefore exempt from the restrictions. c). because practically all Soviet warship classifications are different from "Western" ones - Soviet "aircraft carrying cruisers" were named as such due to the way they were designed/equipped and meant to operate. What prohibits non-Black Sea Aircraft Carriers is their weight. Yes, but as mentioned before, AFAIK the US never officially recognised/signed the treaty, so the question is whether the restrictions would be observed if national interests/tactical considerations were to dictate otherwise.....not that I can imagine such a situation though :) JJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revan Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Found an interesting article. According to this treaty it's not very realistic to have US Ships in the Black Sea :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montreux_Convention_Regarding_the_Regime_of_the_Turkish_Straits "In the case of non-Black Sea powers, these terms make it impossible for transit any modern ships carrying aircraft through the straits without violating the terms of the convention." you know that the premise of DCS is that the US and Russia are at war, the war would be fought anywhere and everywhere. DCS: F-4E really needs to be a thing!!!!!! Aircraft: A-10C, Ka-50, UH-1H, MiG-21, F-15C, Su-27, MiG-29, A-10A, Su-25, Su-25T, TF-51 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Netsk Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 (edited) you know that the premise of DCS is that the US and Russia are at war, the war would be fought anywhere and everywhere. Well, in case of a real conflict in the Black Sea region I'm pretty sure US Aircraft would operate from Carriers in the Mediterranean and from Turkish land bases. Would be crazy to trap yourself in a large pond with one tiny exit together with a whole fleet of Russian Warships, when you don't have to. EDIT: At least the Mediterranean has two tiny exits ;) Edited January 17, 2014 by Netsk Someone might remember me as 'FlyingRussian' from the Ubisoft Lock-On forum back in '03 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkwolf Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 well you should not worry too much. Where the US wants to deploy they carrier, they'll do it whatever situation/treaty/law is around it. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] PC simulator news site. Also....Join the largest DCS community on Facebook :pilotfly: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revan Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 A change that i would like to see for the Naval forces, is that they actually move at the speeds that they can, like 30 Knots instead of 11 kilometers per hour. DCS: F-4E really needs to be a thing!!!!!! Aircraft: A-10C, Ka-50, UH-1H, MiG-21, F-15C, Su-27, MiG-29, A-10A, Su-25, Su-25T, TF-51 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VIKBELL Posted January 20, 2014 Share Posted January 20, 2014 I wonder if the game should reflect that the Chinese Military has a Aircraft carrier as a AI selectable in the DCS world editor and encyclopedia. There are 2 categories of fighter pilots: those who have performed, and those who someday will perform, a magnificent defensive break turn toward a bug on the canopy. Robert Shaw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuDo Posted January 20, 2014 Share Posted January 20, 2014 I want to see this type of action. Please Please Please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
july865 Posted January 20, 2014 Share Posted January 20, 2014 physics like this would be nice . Asus x99, i7 5930k, 32g mem, MSI 1070GTX, 970 Samsung M.2, LG 35in Ultra-Wide, TrackIR 4 Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted January 20, 2014 Share Posted January 20, 2014 I want to see this type of action. Please Please Please Old A-10C 1.1.1.0 Patch, that type of action can be recreate into DCS: World by editor. :music_whistling: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HiJack Posted January 20, 2014 Share Posted January 20, 2014 I want to see this type of action. Please Please Please Great action! Embedded: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUBS17 Posted January 21, 2014 Share Posted January 21, 2014 Theres some really good stuff happening at FSX that would be cool for DCS Carrierops in particular vLSO. vLSO has an AI tanker that flys a realistic pattern above the carrier and also there is the carrier qualifications.:thumbup: Undergraduate CQ Pilot’s first day carrier qualifications prior to designation as a Naval Aviator. 14 day landings, 10 of which shall be arrested. Initial CQ Pilot’s first day or day/night carrier qualification as a designated Naval Aviator. 10 day arrested landings and 6 night arrested landings. Requalification CQ Pilot’s day/night currency exceeds 365 days but less than four years. 6 day arrested landings and 4 night arrested landings. http://www.fsdreamteam.com/forum/index.php/topic,4915.840.html DCS F/A-18C and other addons could benefit a lot from such an addon.:thumbup: [sIGPIC] [/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viper99 Posted January 23, 2014 Share Posted January 23, 2014 With upcoming F/A-18, I would like to see some changes regarding aircraft carriers: 1. Visual gimmicks. That means new ship models (steam effect would be nice for US ships), maybe crew and parked airplanes (non-AI, just models)... wouldn't mind seeing additional crew with shooter appearing upon entering cat position (just like in FSX) 2. "Inteligent ships" that will turn the deck into the wind autonomously during recovery, so we can design missions with dynamic weather without worrying about crosswind approaches when wind changes over the time. 3. Proper AI patterns. No circling 3nm behind the ship, waiting for a slot, like AI likes to do around airports. You've been waved off... climb and make a full pattern. 4. Request tanker feature (S-3 or F-18 with buddy tank) 5. Landing signal officer calls. "You're little high, don't settle, power power, bolter bolter bolter!" - aw yeah! Dunno how russians handling this though... 6. Greenie board maybe? Like this one (vLSO for FSX) ...but maybe I'm asking too much with that. Russian Signal officer: "You are instructed to land - do so!" :smartass: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diveplane Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 need different ocean states included calm water, choppy and high storm sea states. https://www.youtube.com/user/diveplane11 DCS Audio Modding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Netsk Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 physics like this would be nice Well we have that kind of physics? Just remember to add some sea level wind in the ME if you want the ships to rock. In the video there also is no wake effect, while DCS has pretty good one. Someone might remember me as 'FlyingRussian' from the Ubisoft Lock-On forum back in '03 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nirvi Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 From the ED facebooksite: https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/t1/s720x720/71556_10153822521090341_1619187299_n.png https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/t1/s720x720/1661437_10153822521110341_789621607_n.png https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/s720x720/1010811_10153822521115341_1990450449_n.png https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/t1/q71/s720x720/1560471_10153822521295341_120627661_n.jpg Serious uglies Discord 4YA - Project Overlord WW2 Server My DCS Videos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Netsk Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 From the ED facebooksite: https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/t1/s720x720/71556_10153822521090341_1619187299_n.png https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/t1/s720x720/1661437_10153822521110341_789621607_n.png https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/s720x720/1010811_10153822521115341_1990450449_n.png https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/t1/q71/s720x720/1560471_10153822521295341_120627661_n.jpg I hope they will make it smoke like the Kuznetsov. Someone might remember me as 'FlyingRussian' from the Ubisoft Lock-On forum back in '03 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbolya Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 so basically after reading these posts - take DCS and Harpoon and mash them together lol. Be able to direct ships with DCS:CA but then fly an F18 op off a deck if you wish to do that as well =). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlankerFan Posted February 21, 2014 Share Posted February 21, 2014 Ability to command over AI aircraft departing from a carrier, giving them tasks and ROE attributes, creating waypoints for them as like in Combined Arms. If you can turn, it means you're not going fast enough...! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sondo214 Posted February 21, 2014 Share Posted February 21, 2014 The ships safety nets to be able to lower so that we can land with the helicopters. We can now but it's not correct Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joey45 Posted February 21, 2014 Share Posted February 21, 2014 (edited) They have args connected to them as they can be animated in the ModelVeiwer... Arg #150 for the Perry Arg #312 for the Ticonderoga Edited February 21, 2014 by joey45 The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance. "Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.." https://ko-fi.com/joey45 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sondo214 Posted February 21, 2014 Share Posted February 21, 2014 Yes but can they be operated? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joey45 Posted February 21, 2014 Share Posted February 21, 2014 Nope. Just tried a few possibilities in the .LUA file of the Tic..... The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance. "Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.." https://ko-fi.com/joey45 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sondo214 Posted February 21, 2014 Share Posted February 21, 2014 :cry:So this is my whish! They are there, make them move! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joey45 Posted February 21, 2014 Share Posted February 21, 2014 Indeedy. The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance. "Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.." https://ko-fi.com/joey45 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revan Posted February 21, 2014 Share Posted February 21, 2014 My wish is for The Carl Vinson to have working cats so i can launch my mod F-4 off the deck DCS: F-4E really needs to be a thing!!!!!! Aircraft: A-10C, Ka-50, UH-1H, MiG-21, F-15C, Su-27, MiG-29, A-10A, Su-25, Su-25T, TF-51 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts