Jump to content

Flaming Cliffs 3

Vecko

By Vecko
in DCS: Flaming Cliffs 3

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 840
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

OGREMAN

OGREMAN

Posted
Posted (edited)

AB...SO...LUTELY, BLOODY SPECTACULAR IDEA

The prospect of finally having a wide range of aircraft types to fly and do battle in the same environment is MORE THAN WELCOME. It would mark a (long overdue) move to the conditions that gave LOCK ON its ledgendry player appeal, longevity and status.

 

I have long held the view that disconnected study sims (no matter how good) effectively break up the combat flight sim community into ever smaller groups, simply not a good idea in an already specialised small market. Flight sim Nirvana ..... ONE ENVIRONMENT ... wide range of "plug in" aircraft types. I hope this very tentative suggestion comes to fruition.


Edited by OGREMAN
POV addition

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dudikoff

Dudikoff

Posted
Posted
What's not to love, hmm a few things I don't like.

  1. No missiles
  2. I think they look ugly
  3. I hate WWI and WWII stuff
  4. Not modern

 

Personally, wouldn't go that far to call them ugly (at least the WWII part :) ), but would agree that flying them in DCS doesn't seem as appealing as some later jet aircraft (or appealing at all, to be honest :) ).

i386DX40@42 MHz w/i387 CP, 4 MB RAM (8*512 kB), Trident 8900C 1 MB w/16-bit RAMDAC ISA, Quantum 340 MB UDMA33, SB 16, DOS 6.22 w/QEMM + Win3.11CE, Quickshot 1btn 2axis, Numpad as hat. 2 FPH on a good day, 1 FPH avg.

 

DISCLAIMER: My posts are still absolutely useless. Just finding excuses not to learn the F-14 (HB's Swansong?).

 

Annoyed by my posts? Please consider donating. Once the target sum is reached, I'll be off to somewhere nice I promise not to post from. I'd buy that for a dollar!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pilotasso

Pilotasso

Posted
Posted

According to the news your going to get the jet anyways, a WWII plane is a refreshing option to break the routine!

[sigpic]http://forums.eagle.ru/signaturepics/sigpic4448_29.gif[/sigpic]

My PC specs below:

Case: Corsair 400C

PSU: SEASONIC SS-760XP2 760W Platinum

CPU: AMD RYZEN 3900X (12C/24T)

RAM: 32 GB 4266Mhz (two 2x8 kits) of trident Z RGB @3600Mhz CL 14 CR=1T

MOBO: ASUS CROSSHAIR HERO VI AM4

GFX: GTX 1080Ti MSI Gaming X

Cooler: NXZT Kraken X62 280mm AIO

Storage: Samsung 960 EVO 1TB M.2+6GB WD 6Gb red

HOTAS: Thrustmaster Warthog + CH pro pedals

Monitor: Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD Freesync HDR400 1440P

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OGREMAN

OGREMAN

Posted
Posted
Global map? Some tried and failed.

 

Not entirely TRUE pilotasso ..... take a looK at OUTERRA Terrain generating engine spectacularly good global terrain that due to the fact that it runs almost entirely in the graphics card leaves the CPU free to run SIM Flight etc.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Speacy

Speacy

Posted
Posted

What are you doing?

 

I think major part of the DCS community are waiting your DCS aircraft (realistic), for compatibility and complementarity with A-10C, FC3 is naturally not compatible with "your" description of DCS modules. I don't care to get FC3, why you are not working more on the futur "DCS" module than FC3 or your flying legend (leave that to rise of flight or cliff of dover).

  • Like 1

[sIGPIC]http://355th.fr/public/style_images/Speacy.png[/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KillarZ

KillarZ

Posted
Posted
What are you doing?

 

I think major part of the DCS community are waiting your DCS aircraft (realistic), for compatibility and complementarity with A-10C, FC3 is naturally not compatible with "your" description of DCS modules. I don't care to get FC3, why you are not working more on the futur "DCS" module than FC3 or your flying legend (leave that to rise of flight or cliff of dover).

 

Read number 5 on Wags post... Here

 

5- The next US fixed wing jet DCS aircraft is being worked on in parallel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
element1108

element1108

Posted
Posted
What are you doing?

 

I think major part of the DCS community are waiting your DCS aircraft (realistic), for compatibility and complementarity with A-10C, FC3 is naturally not compatible with "your" description of DCS modules. I don't care to get FC3, why you are not working more on the futur "DCS" module than FC3 or your flying legend (leave that to rise of flight or cliff of dover).

 

Speak for yourself mate, ED can clearly handle everyone's wishes, FC3 and continuing with the next module and it is clear they've broke most expectations with the flying legends and other goodies.

 

They are making leaps and bounds and not just small micro moves, so be patient and enjoy the ride.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dudikoff

Dudikoff

Posted
Posted
Yes, this in fact means the next DCS fighter can be suprisingly showing up at any time regardless of the list number! :D (HJ)

 

And that it can show up (un)surprisingly even further down the list ;)

i386DX40@42 MHz w/i387 CP, 4 MB RAM (8*512 kB), Trident 8900C 1 MB w/16-bit RAMDAC ISA, Quantum 340 MB UDMA33, SB 16, DOS 6.22 w/QEMM + Win3.11CE, Quickshot 1btn 2axis, Numpad as hat. 2 FPH on a good day, 1 FPH avg.

 

DISCLAIMER: My posts are still absolutely useless. Just finding excuses not to learn the F-14 (HB's Swansong?).

 

Annoyed by my posts? Please consider donating. Once the target sum is reached, I'll be off to somewhere nice I promise not to post from. I'd buy that for a dollar!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Teknetinium

Teknetinium

Posted
Posted (edited)

Hallelujah for FC3!!!

 

I will repeat my old words.

FC2 is the most realistic sim out there even thou u dont have accurate flight models the variety of different aircrafts makes the multiplayer Environment more realistic then any modern air combat sims. FC3 is very much welcomed, from my point of view FC3 will be the game that will make the Multiplayer community very pleased witch will give ED more time to develop even more accurate flight models while we are all happy:)

 

At the moment multiplayer community are using all of FC2 potentials and a little bit more. For example Georgian multiplayer campaign would not be able to run whit out FC2, since there is not enough aircrafts in DCS at the moment to run a full scale campaign where everyone from bomber, chopper, fighter pilots can interact in same theater against each other. Witch is possible because FC2 has red and blue aircrafts witch makes the multiplayer incounters mutch more interesting and keeps the interest of the game. The point is if ED will decide to release only fighters and bombers for one side they will become no difrent from othere developers.

 

Thank you ED.

 

http://www.51st.org/campaign/

 

Jippy!!!


Edited by Teknetinium
  • Like 2

Teknetinium 2017.jpg
                        51st PVO Discord SATAC YouTube
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
element1108

element1108

Posted
Posted

In the past I've debated against a FC3 as to not hold up the development of DCS modules. I did end by saying that should a FC3 come about, I would be super happy. The roadmap is exciting for everybody who fly's ED products, seeing as there's no real competition I love how ED are not letting that fact keep them from pushing our expectations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Milene

Milene

Posted
Posted

O jeez im a bit worried here.... FC3 compatible with BS2 and A10? So arcade boats against sim boats.. i dont understand :(

 

ww2 planes really? why ? Cliffs of dover and Il2 already have that area covered.

 

I dont mind FC3 but i dont really see the connection. The ww2 thing is a waiste of precious development time on the next fixed wing thing in my opinion.

Flanker, Flanker 2.0, Flanker 2.5, Lockon, FC1, FC2,FC3, BS1, BS2, A10C, CA and World

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
EtherealN

EtherealN

Posted
Posted
O jeez im a bit worried here.... FC3 compatible with BS2 and A10? So arcade boats against sim boats.. i dont understand :(

 

Yeah, I know the sim boats have an unfair advantage through actually having most of their capabilities modeled, but the jet jockeys will just have to live with that. ;)

 

I dont mind FC3 but i dont really see the connection. The ww2 thing is a waiste of precious development time on the next fixed wing thing in my opinion.

 

As was said:

"5- The next US fixed wing jet DCS aircraft is being worked on in parallel."

http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=1327908#post1327908

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Daniel "EtherealN" Agorander | Даниэль "эфирныйн" Агорандер

Intel i7 2600K @ 4.4GHz, ASUS Sabertooth P67, 8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1600MHz, ASUS GTX 560Ti DirectCU II 1GB, Samsung 830series 512GB SSD, Corsair AX850w, two BENQ screens and TM HOTAS Warthog

DCS: A-10C Warthog FAQ | DCS: P-51D FAQ | Remember to read the Forum Rules |

|
| Life of a Game Tester
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rikus

Rikus

Posted
Posted

Call of Duty

 

Yes, this start to be as Call of Duty, same game, same graphic engine, new maps, again 60 euros.

 

Flaming Cliffs the same. Flaming Cliff 1, then FC2 to make it compatible with DCS, and now, again FC3

 

Spend resources in FC3 instead next DCS.

 

I think is a fail to join FC series with DCS series. FC have advantage against DCS planes because it´s easier and quicker to fly.

 

I think ED thinks only to make money make money since some time ago, instead to look for customers...

 

Greetings

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rattler

rattler

Posted
Posted

This is a great start in the right direction and here is hoping ED will be able to continue in this direction. This is the news we have been asking for all along and glad to see ED come out with this statement. I know sometimes we give ED a hard time in the forum at times but the occasional statement from the Company is always appreciated and lays a nice foundation for us as consumers to look upon and hope they can meet their goals. Maybe every half year a statement such as this would go a long way in settling down threads that appear at times. Thank you very much ED for this informative communication and hope all goals can be meet over time. Cheers.

 

rattler

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...