Guest DeathAngelBR Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 In the next 50 years or so. Use a translator Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
169th_Moose Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 In the next 50 years or so. Use a translator Lmaoo, made me look, :rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paladrian Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 2 Thz = 2024Ghz!! that is insane!! :rolleyes: A friend of mine who is too much into PCs once told me that we were already too close to the theoretical limit of speed, I guess I should have asked what that limit was :icon_roll Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gamble Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 Silizium has a limit we will arrive this limit in the next 5 years. there exist some ideas about other technologies but they are far away to realize that Asus P6T | Intel i7 920 (2,67) @ 3,60 Ghz | Geforce GTX570 | Sound: Realtec onboard | 6 GB Kingston KHX 12800 DDR3 | Windows 7 Pro 64bit | SSD-HDD | TM WARTHOG # 01069 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex979 Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 Couldn't understand a word. But since you mentioned 2 THz i guess we're talking clockspeed here. Sounds pretty fast... I think the harddrives won't be fast enough for those CPU speeds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floyd Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 More transistors mean faster chips. By then, a billion transistors on a chip should be possible. That should produce chips that will run well over 10 GHz. "Maybe you're going to get 12, 15, 20 gigahertz," said High. http://www.cyberwalker.net/features/future-chips.shtml Even if only half of that is truth, it will be very fast ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ThomasDWeiss Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 With luck - this thing will run Lock On 5.2 at 12FPS at the most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bflagg Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 With luck - this thing will run Lock On 5.2 at 12FPS at the most. of course waiting for the next generation of hardware to run it.... :D :o Thanks, Brett Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIOLOG Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 Theoretical maximum is indeed very close... It's defined by PN gap width (in nanometers). After that we could only get faster in one way - quantum computors. But they have some problems, which are hard to solve... so... Maybe someone else can invent something The bird of Hermes is my name eating my wings to make me tame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUBS17 Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 When they reach a bottleneck in CPU speed they'll start using multiCPUs and banking them(They're already starting to do that now). Theres also research into biological computers that use cells, I've heard that they are supposed to be quite fast but the news on it went quiet a few years back. [sIGPIC] [/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sardukar Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 DNA computers are probably the next big thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdittyr Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 2 Thz = 2024Ghz!! You're close, it actually equals 2048GHz, I know, I know, it's nit picking, but hey... all the extra power is sometimes needed in Lomac. __________________ kdittyr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts