desertowl Posted August 12, 2021 Share Posted August 12, 2021 Hello all, Will there be an option to arm mixed load on the BRU racks? e.g - 1 JSOW + 1 JDAM on station 7 and 1 CBU 105 + CBU 103 on station 3? Best, desert Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED Team NineLine Posted August 12, 2021 ED Team Share Posted August 12, 2021 The team isnt aware of this being a "thing", but if you have some info on it, we would be happy to take a look. Thanks. Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desertowl Posted August 12, 2021 Author Share Posted August 12, 2021 Well, it is explicitly written in the product brochure: "BRU-57/A supports various weapons on a single unit and asymmetric loading on the aircraft." It is also backed by the BRU57 System Performance Specification - from the SMS point of view, these are two independent MIL-STD-1760 stations. I do not, however, have any information regrading whether such configurations were available on the F16CM block 50 circa 2007 l3harris-bru-57-sell-sheet-sas.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED Team NineLine Posted August 12, 2021 ED Team Share Posted August 12, 2021 Yeah thats the trick, knowing if it was used on the one we are modelling. Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoxOne007 Posted August 13, 2021 Share Posted August 13, 2021 5 hours ago, desertowl said: Well, it is explicitly written in the product brochure: "BRU-57/A supports various weapons on a single unit and asymmetric loading on the aircraft." It is also backed by the BRU57 System Performance Specification - from the SMS point of view, these are two independent MIL-STD-1760 stations. I do not, however, have any information regrading whether such configurations were available on the F16CM block 50 circa 2007 l3harris-bru-57-sell-sheet-sas.pdf 934.34 kB · 8 downloads 4 hours ago, NineLine said: Yeah thats the trick, knowing if it was used on the one we are modelling. I’m gonna go out on a limb and say the “asymmetrical load” is being able to load a GBU-54 and a GBU-38. They are kind of the same bomb but not fully of course. It’s the same on the F-15E, where they can be mixed and matched on a CFT. Being able to load say a JSOW and GBU sounds illogical and is something I’ve never ever seen, to not get started about potential clearance/separation issues [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desertowl Posted August 13, 2021 Author Share Posted August 13, 2021 I have seen photos of 54 and 38 mixed loads and I don't see any reason for 103 and 105 on the same rack. Didn't see any evidence of JSOW with CBU or JDAM up until now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killshot0597 Posted August 13, 2021 Share Posted August 13, 2021 3 hours ago, desertowl said: I have seen photos of 54 and 38 mixed loads and I don't see any reason for 103 and 105 on the same rack. Didn't see any evidence of JSOW with CBU or JDAM up until now. This has nothing to do with what is reasonable, what NineLine is saying is if our specific variant of the F-16 has software capable of accepting such loadouts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pathfinder_50 Posted September 16, 2021 Share Posted September 16, 2021 Found this about the BRU 57/A and the BRU 55/A https://man.fas.org/dod-101/sys/ac/equip/docs/bru-57-System_Performance_Specification.html#_Toc438517638 can’t find any infos about mixed loadout, but I’m not familiar with all the vocabulary so if someone with more knowledge than me could check, it would be cool ! [DEVILS] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts