Jump to content

Mi-24 HIND VP Make it happen please ED


Mainstay

Recommended Posts

The problem is the Russian govt., especially defense ministry will most likely say "Нет!"

Don't get me wrong, I'd love to have additional variants of hinds too, but I think we can consider ourselves very lucky that we actually got the P version at all.


Edited by SmukY
  • Like 2

Helicopters don't fly, they just subdue the air.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SmukY said:

The problem is the Russian govt., especially defense ministry will most likely say "Нет!"

Don't get me wrong, I'd love to have additional variants of hinds too, but I think we can consider ourselves very lucky that we actually got the P version at all.

 

 

Yeah i know the way to Russian planes, helo's and automobiles isnt an easy one. But on the other hand if you got the go for the P the road to get permission to make a VP seems a lot shorter and you already know the players on the field.

g8PjVMw.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure how different this chopper would be to the P version, it's just a chin turret. Basically you are offloading the aiming and firing of the gun on a strafing run to the guy in the front seat. The helicopter still needs to jink, when coming under fire, which would make aiming the gun really difficult anyway. Unless they've changed the operating and tactical procedures of the VP, where the helicopter would hover and fire the turret from a distance. Which i really doubt. I'd take the 30mm twin cannon over the chin turret any day of the week. 

Specs: Win10, i5-13600KF, 32GB DDR4 RAM 3200XMP, 1 TB M2 NVMe SSD, KFA2 RTX3090, VR G2 Headset, Warthog Throttle+Saitek Pedals+MSFFB2  Joystick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same, I'd love a V.

 

It was the most produced variant, and it's basically a 95% copy and paste of our current P. 

  • Pilot cockpit is basically identical apart from the weapons selector, the main difference would be redo of the operator cockpit.
  • Nearly identical 3D model (only really the turret, maybe Lipa - even if non-functional).
  • Basically identical flight dynamics (just different recoil and maybe weight), engine might be a slightly different variant.
  • It can replace the current AI Mi-24V.

Ultimately, the overwhelming majority of Hinds and Hind variants had trainable turrets, even if it can be argued they're less effective than the fixed 30mm cannon. The Huey also has unstabilised guns that can be difficult to aim, and it's calibre isn't much more than half of the YakB.

  • Like 2

Modules I own: F-14A/B, Mi-24P, AV-8B N/A, AJS 37, F-5E-3, MiG-21bis, F-16CM, F/A-18C, Supercarrier, Mi-8MTV2, UH-1H, Mirage 2000C, FC3, MiG-15bis, Ka-50, A-10C (+ A-10C II), P-47D, P-51D, C-101, Yak-52, WWII Assets, CA, NS430, Hawk.

Terrains I own: South Atlantic, Syria, The Channel, SoH/PG, Marianas.

System:

GIGABYTE B650 AORUS ELITE AX, AMD Ryzen 5 7600, Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5200 32 GB, Western Digital Black SN850X 1 TB (DCS dedicated) & 2 TB NVMe SSDs, Corsair RM850X 850 W, NZXT H7 Flow, MSI G274CV.

Peripherals: VKB Gunfighter Mk.II w. MCG Pro, MFG Crosswind V3 Graphite, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is also an interesting read : https://en.topwar.ru/25832-40-let-legendarnomu-boevomu-vertoletu-mi-24-chast-3-modifikaciya.html

 

Despite the high characteristics of the YakB-12,7 machine gun, he did not fully suit the army Aviation. Gradually came to the thought of the need to equip the Mi-24 30-mm automatic gun GSH-ZOK. But the mass and recoil force during firing did not allow its placement in the USPU-24 installation instead of a machine gun. The GSH-ZOK was mounted motionless in the U-280 installation on the starboard side of the helicopter, and the combat button was placed on the pilot's control handle.In 1975, the tests of the Mi-24P helicopter (product 243) began, which, due to the refinement weapons dragged on for more than five years. Only in April, 1981 g. Cannon modification launched into mass production. The subsequent operation of the machine revealed a lack of efficiency and limited application of the fixed gun.

Experience has shown that it is much more rational to use a mobile cannon-mount NPPU-24 (9А-4454) with an 23-mm double-barreled gun GSH-23Л. The helicopter, equipped with this installation, received the designation Mi-24VP (product 258). Compared to the machine gun USPU-24, the firing sector in the horizontal plane did not change, but the vertical deflection of the barrels became possible in the range from + 10 ° to - 40 ° (previously from + 2 ° to - 60 °). The mass of the installation did not change, but the rate of fire was reduced from 5000 to 3400 shots / min.

g8PjVMw.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they only ever built about 24 VP's before ending Hind production, so its not like it was much more common than the KA50.

I think the P was the right choice. But if they ever felt like doing an addon pack with a V or a D then Id be delighted with it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

IMO the next logical step would be the 1M upgrade for the P model. Looks awesome with a lot of added capability. That's provided they get permission from the manufacture. Could be a selling point to any country you are trying to sell it to.  It's an export version on top of that. I don't think the Russian government is buying any.  


Edited by NightTrain
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Stuart alluded to, even Alex/Pilot-Mi-8 the head of the dev team said that they made so little of the VP it couldn’t have been that good and what’s the point, that a more produced variant would be a much better idea but still unlikely

Black Shark Den Squadron Member: We are open to new recruits, click here to check us out or apply to join! https://blacksharkden.com

E3FFFC01-584A-411C-8AFB-B02A23157EB6.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...