upyr1 Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 This is a follow up to 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites
TLTeo Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Out of aircraft that aren't in DCS yet, most of the Century Series, but especially the Starfighter. Also the Draken and the Su-7 Fitter. 4 Link to post Share on other sites
upyr1 Posted February 19 Author Share Posted February 19 2 minutes ago, TLTeo said: Out of aircraft that aren't in DCS yet, most of the Century Series, but especially the Starfighter. Also the Draken and the Su-7 Fitter. The heavy weight championship of 1964- Su-7 vs F-105 3 1 Link to post Share on other sites
TLTeo Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 If we're going for that I'll throw in the Yak-28 Brewer, which was heavier than the Fitter. I'll admit the chance of having either bomber or interceptor Brewers in DCS are nil though. 3 Link to post Share on other sites
Rudel_chw Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 The B-58 .... I’d love to have it as AI 4 For work: iMac mid-2010 of 27" - Core i7 870 - 6 GB DDR3 1333 MHz - ATI HD5670 - SSD 256 GB - HDD 2 TB - macOS High Sierra For Gaming: 34" Monitor - Ryzen 3600 - 32 GB DDR4 2400 - nVidia GTX1070ti - SSD 1.25 TB - HDD 10 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Cougar - Oculus Rift CV1 Mobile: iPad Pro 12.9" of 256 GB Link to post Share on other sites
bies Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 (edited) Phantom, Draken, first MiG-25P without look down radar became operational at the very end of 1960s so this one for sure And at this moment I realized I would take any plane from this era, F-105, A-5, A-6, F-8, A-7, MiG-23, Su-7, Mirage III, Tu-22, B-58, F-111... Edited February 19 by bies Link to post Share on other sites
lmp Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 MiG-21F-13 - it's so pretty. Su-7, Phantom obviously, MiG-23 obviously. I'm on the fence when it comes to the MiG-25, all versions of it were very specialised, but at the same time effective in their little niches. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
TotenDead Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 4 минуты назад, lmp сказал: MiG-21F-13 - it's so pretty. Su-7, Phantom obviously, MiG-23 obviously. I'm on the fence when it comes to the MiG-25, all versions of it were very specialised, but at the same time effective in their little niches. MiG-25 was pretty much used as a usual fighter. And effectively Link to post Share on other sites
lmp Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 6 minutes ago, TotenDead said: MiG-25 was pretty much used as a usual fighter. And effectively Oh, absolutely, it is very much underrated as a fighter. Thing is, the P/PD variant could do pretty much only A-A. The recon/bomber variants on the other hand weren't good at it at all, and quite limited in their selection and weight of A-G ordnance. Link to post Share on other sites
Raviar Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 (edited) F-5, F-4 & A-37 Dragon fly (I edited my post, I would not my forget my self because I forget to mention A-37) not a plane but I wish we can have it soon -> AH-1 Edited February 21 by Raviar Spoiler Instagram: dcs_world_iran Twitter: dcs_world_iran YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgBHcZaMhTEmYSEBvvJq1vg Aparat: https://www.aparat.com/dcs.world.iran Link to post Share on other sites
SharkWizard Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 So this is the thread I should have posted the F-102A, F-106A. Didn't notice the Korean War tag there. Also MiG-25. That plane would be nice to have in order to "jump" over the opposition and blow up their Awacs with 4xR-40s jump over them again and land to get more R-40s. Might be risky in case of an opposing F-15 amraam carrier on the way. But still it would be an enjoyable enterprise. Then of course Draken, finnish forest dwelling variant naturally. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
rkk01 Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 For low-level strike... Blackburn Buccaneer SEPECAT Jaguar both would bring something new to DCS 2 Link to post Share on other sites
garyscott Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 Buccaneers, Jag, and early FG.1 Phantom. Heaven. 2 Alien desktop PC, Intel i7-8700 CPU@3.20GHz 6 Core, Nvidia GTX 1070, 16GB RAM. TM Warthog stick and Throttles. Saitek ProFlight pedals. Link to post Share on other sites
exhausted Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 We need an F-5A with a complimenting CF-5A/ refueling probe complimenting it. The aircraft was prevalent on every continent, so it makes sense. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Baco Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 F-4 Phantom II, No doubt the mots glaring absence in DCS by far. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
upyr1 Posted February 21 Author Share Posted February 21 On 2/20/2021 at 6:58 AM, Raviar said: F-5 & F-4 . not a plane but I wish we can have it soon -> AH-1 Can't forget the choppers. 19 hours ago, exhausted said: We need an F-5A with a complimenting CF-5A/ refueling probe complimenting it. The aircraft was prevalent on every continent, so it makes sense. How about a F-5C it was an A with a USAF refueling receptacle 1 Link to post Share on other sites
exhausted Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 2 hours ago, upyr1 said: Can't forget the choppers. How about a F-5C it was an A with a USAF refueling receptacle Sounds superficial. The F-5C was given a a2a refueling probe and modifications to fight corrosion. It was only used in South Vietnam. I think you could use the F-5A to cover the -C as a supplement. But a dedicated -C would be pointless as it robs the biggest advantage the F-5A has going for it: it was used by so many countries, but the -C was not. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
MiG21bisFishbedL Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 MiG-27K OV-1 Mohawk Su-7 of some stripe Draken Lansen F-5A [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Click here to see the updated time until DCS: F-22A Link to post Share on other sites
upyr1 Posted February 22 Author Share Posted February 22 8 hours ago, exhausted said: Sounds superficial. The F-5C was given a a2a refueling probe and modifications to fight corrosion. It was only used in South Vietnam. I think you could use the F-5A to cover the -C as a supplement. But a dedicated -C would be pointless as it robs the biggest advantage the F-5A has going for it: it was used by so many countries, but the -C was not. I was thinking both in the same module, since I was under the impression the fuel probe was the only difference. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
TaxDollarsAtWork Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 F-4E Blk 53, soft wing with all the goodies F-111C or F Su-24MK SEPECAT Jaguar (Preferably late Omani/RAF spec) J-22B F-7B 1 Link to post Share on other sites
bies Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 2 hours ago, TaxDollarsAtWork said: Su-24MK He asked about "Mid-Cold War / Viet Nam era planes (1955 -1975)" "Su-24MK" entered production in 1988, 2 years before the end of the Cold War. First basic variant Su-24 with "Puma" navigation system, "Orbita" computer and shorter fuselage entered service in 1975 after official trials. That being said I would love to have Su-24M from late Cold War 1980s when it's mission was all weather low level penetration strike against NATO targets and forces in East Germany. Just Like Tornado IDS and F-111F for NATO. In those days this kind of aircrafts still had their very important place and low level strike was considered dangerous yet still possible. Link to post Share on other sites
VTJS17_Fire Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 A-6 A-7 F-4 F-111 AH-1 2 Hardware: Intel i5 4670K | Zalman NPS9900MAX | GeIL 16GB @1333MHz | Asrock Z97 Pro4 | Sapphire Radeon R9 380X Nitro | Samsung SSDs 840 series 120GB & 250 GB | Samsung HD204UI 2TB | be quiet! Pure Power 530W | Aerocool RS-9 Devil Red | Samsung SyncMaster SA350 24" + ASUS VE198S 19" | Saitek X52 | TrackIR 5 | Thrustmaster MFD Cougar | Speedlink Darksky LED | Razor Diamondback | Razor X-Mat Control | SoundBlaster Tactic 3D Rage ### Software: Windows 10 Pro 64Bit [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to post Share on other sites
Marsvinet Posted February 23 Share Posted February 23 I am all about that F105. Any version is fun, D for that Vietnam canyon run feeling, hauling 6000lbs of bombs to a target. G for that old school weaselin, though most of the fun stuff in that version is probably classified still. But I just like those low level, fast bombers. So Aardvarks or Fencers are also good in my book. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
Northstar98 Posted February 23 Share Posted February 23 (edited) F-4 Phantom II (namely M, S, E, K) Harrier GR.3 (FRS.1 is just slightly too late, and if GR.3 is too late then the GR.1A) F-104G Starfighter MiG-23M J 35F/D A 32A/J 32 MiG-21bis Tu-16 (as AI; preferably the initial basic bomber variant (Badger A), dedicated maritime strike (Tu-16K-10-26 'Badger C Mod.') and combined w/out RADAR (Tu-16KSR-2-5-11 'Badger G Mod.') Edited February 24 by Northstar98 1 Modules I own: F-14A/B, F/A-18C, Supercarrier, F-16CM, AJS-37, F-5E-3, MiG-21bis, Ka-50, A-10C (+ A-10C II), UH-1H, Mi-8MTV2, P-47D, P-51D, FC3, MiG-15bis, Yak-52, CA, C-101, Hawk Terrains I own: Syria, The Channel, SoH System (RIP my old PC): Dell XPS 15 9570 w/ Intel i7-8750H, NVIDIA GTX 1050Ti Max-Q, 16GB DDR4, 500GB Samsung PM871 SSD (upgraded with 1TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus SSD) VKB Gunfighter Mk.II w. MCG Pro Dreams: https://uk.pcpartpicker.com/list/mBG4dD Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now