Jump to content

So when can we expect the F-15E from Razbam


Recommended Posts

On 2/6/2021 at 1:01 PM, flankerjun said:

Razbam is a small team,but have so many projects,so they are very inefficient,i like the F15E so deeply,but i know that we can not fly it in recent years,or need 10 more years to deal the bugs.

Luckily you know nothing 😁

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there might be a valid reason behind Razbam delaying the systems development for their aircraft, simply because in the next few months there will be massive changes to the DCS core which means that they might have to redo a lot of the work they have done for the current version of DCS in a few months again (think of 2.7 update, VulkanAPI, etc..). So might be that they are staging the modules as much as they can for release and then when the major changes are in, they will put that effort in. Just an idea 🙂


Edited by TAW_derdoe
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yes, this must also be the valid reason for the last 9 years, since the Eagle is announced. Come on, we will never see this bird! The only thing we see about it, are some nice cockpit pictures of the 3D model since years and the recurrent message that it is on hold again.


Edited by Viper1970

Cockpit PC System: Ryzen 9 3900XT / RTX 3090 / 64GB RAM / HP Reverb G2 / Triple View / TIR5 / W10 64Bit

HOTAS: 4x TM Warthog Throttle /4x TM F-16/A-10 Grip /2x TM F/A-18 Grip / Virpil VFX Grip / TM Cougar / TM TPR Rudder / 2x Cougar MFD Set

DIY-Projects: AH-64D & OH-58D Controls / F-15E Grip / F-14, F-15, F/A-18 Warthog Throttle Conversion / Cougar Real F-16 Style AB/Idle + AV-8B Nozzle Control

DCS-Modules: F-5E / F-14A/B / F-16C / F/A-18C / A-10C / A-10C II / AV-8B / MIG-21bis / UH-1H / KA-50 / MI-8MT / FC3 / Combined Arms / Christen Eagle II / Supercarrier / Nevada / Persian Gulf / Syria

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Viper1970 i think you didnt quite get my point. My point was that it might be a valid reason NOW / at this point in time to delay development items that will drastically change the core of DCS and therefore will require a lot of extra work when the major changes to the DCS core are done. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the Eagle is the module they should have to focus their work on, cause it's the oldest module that was announced, even long before the Harrier. It's ok that they fix the problems with already existing modules before they work on anything else, but why have they released a MIG-19 and now started a MIG-23 and also a Lightning, instead of working on the Strike Eagle they announced since years? What comes next before they really work on the Mudhen? I doubt we will ever see an F-15E from Razbam. This is the constant "on hold" module and nothing else.

 

 


Edited by Viper1970

Cockpit PC System: Ryzen 9 3900XT / RTX 3090 / 64GB RAM / HP Reverb G2 / Triple View / TIR5 / W10 64Bit

HOTAS: 4x TM Warthog Throttle /4x TM F-16/A-10 Grip /2x TM F/A-18 Grip / Virpil VFX Grip / TM Cougar / TM TPR Rudder / 2x Cougar MFD Set

DIY-Projects: AH-64D & OH-58D Controls / F-15E Grip / F-14, F-15, F/A-18 Warthog Throttle Conversion / Cougar Real F-16 Style AB/Idle + AV-8B Nozzle Control

DCS-Modules: F-5E / F-14A/B / F-16C / F/A-18C / A-10C / A-10C II / AV-8B / MIG-21bis / UH-1H / KA-50 / MI-8MT / FC3 / Combined Arms / Christen Eagle II / Supercarrier / Nevada / Persian Gulf / Syria

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Viper1970 said:

I think the Eagle is the module they should have to focus their work on, cause it's the oldest module that was announced, even long before the Harrier. It's ok that they fix the problems with already existing modules before they work on anything else, but why have they released a MIG-19 and now started a MIG-23 and also a Lightning, instead of working on the Strike Eagle they announced since years? I doubt we will ever see an F-15E from Razbam. This is the constant on hold module and nothing else.

 

 

 

 

One of the reason why they keep starting mew project js that they have much more 3D and 2D artists in their team than coders. And the only way to keep them busy is starting new projects, while the few coder are already struggling finishing the current modules. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

But this makes things even worse. They always announce new modules, people are waiting for and they never become reality. I think they should do one thing and this one good, instead of promise many things which never come true. At the end they won't be doing themselfes a favour. Maybe they should look for new coders instead of starting one fictitious project after the other.


 
  • Like 4

Cockpit PC System: Ryzen 9 3900XT / RTX 3090 / 64GB RAM / HP Reverb G2 / Triple View / TIR5 / W10 64Bit

HOTAS: 4x TM Warthog Throttle /4x TM F-16/A-10 Grip /2x TM F/A-18 Grip / Virpil VFX Grip / TM Cougar / TM TPR Rudder / 2x Cougar MFD Set

DIY-Projects: AH-64D & OH-58D Controls / F-15E Grip / F-14, F-15, F/A-18 Warthog Throttle Conversion / Cougar Real F-16 Style AB/Idle + AV-8B Nozzle Control

DCS-Modules: F-5E / F-14A/B / F-16C / F/A-18C / A-10C / A-10C II / AV-8B / MIG-21bis / UH-1H / KA-50 / MI-8MT / FC3 / Combined Arms / Christen Eagle II / Supercarrier / Nevada / Persian Gulf / Syria

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/23/2021 at 11:16 AM, razo+r said:

 

One of the reason why they keep starting mew project js that they have much more 3D and 2D artists in their team than coders.

 

They probably work with external 3d artists for some of their work, like Metal2Mesh. It would make more senses.


Edited by Papanowel
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...