Jump to content

Remove 15 seconds warm-up of ECM.


Coxy_99

Recommended Posts

All can blink but not Flanker! Typical ED bias approach! 15 sec was implemented so F-15 could take TWS shot, it was done for pure balancing. As you noticed ED do balancing only for Blue regarding jammers or SD-10. It is a shame by ED end the answer why no one fly Flankers, Its thx to ED nothing else. If ED showed no BIAS community would feel better.  

 


Edited by Teknetinium

Teknetinium 2017.jpg
                        51st PVO Discord SATAC YouTube
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • ED Team

We do have a report open about it, however I have no news to share. 

 

I have made a comment on the report, but can make no promises for the outcome. The team will take a look. 

  • Like 1

smallCATPILOT.PNG.04bbece1b27ff1b2c193b174ec410fc0.PNG

Forum rules - DCS Crashing? Try this first - Cleanup and Repair - Discord BIGNEWY#8703 - Youtube - Patch Status

Windows 11, NVIDIA MSI RTX 3090, Intel® i9-10900K 3.70GHz, 5.30GHz Turbo, Corsair Hydro Series H150i Pro, 64GB DDR @3200, ASUS ROG Strix Z490-F Gaming, HP Reverb G2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@BIGNEWY It would be nice to mark this as urgent because it is affecting all kinds of gameplay, SP and MP.

 

There is no easy solution, ED needs to up their game a little for ECM/ECCM simulation.  A reasonable quick fix would be nice to have.

  • Like 2

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D

I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • ED Team
25 minutes ago, Teknetinium said:

All can blink but not Flanker! Typical ED bias approach! 15 sec was implemented so F-15 could take TWS shot, it was done for pure balancing. As you noticed ED do balancing only for Blue regarding jammers or SD-10. It is a shame by ED end the answer why no one fly Flankers, Its thx to ED nothing else. If ED showed no BIAS community would feel better.  

 

 

As stated we are looking into it, but of you think calling us names, or accusing us of bias is the way to make change happen, I would ask you to rethink that approach, it has not worked well with you in the past. Please keep it constructive and mature, last warning.

  • Like 1

64Sig.png
Forum RulesMy YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**

1146563203_makefg(6).png.82dab0a01be3a361522f3fff75916ba4.png  80141746_makefg(1).png.6fa028f2fe35222644e87c786da1fabb.png  28661714_makefg(2).png.b3816386a8f83b0cceab6cb43ae2477e.png  389390805_makefg(3).png.bca83a238dd2aaf235ea3ce2873b55bc.png  216757889_makefg(4).png.35cb826069cdae5c1a164a94deaff377.png  1359338181_makefg(5).png.e6135dea01fa097e5d841ee5fb3c2dc5.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, GGTharos said:

@BIGNEWY It would be nice to mark this as urgent because it is affecting all kinds of gameplay, SP and MP.

 

There is no easy solution, ED needs to up their game a little for ECM/ECCM simulation.  A reasonable quick fix would be nice to have.

 

Agree. Im not trying to whine just pointing some things could change from the old days.

 

8 minutes ago, NineLine said:

As stated we are looking into it, but of you think calling us names, or accusing us of bias is the way to make change happen, I would ask you to rethink that approach, it has not worked well with you in the past. Please keep it constructive and mature, last warning.

 

You hear constructive feedback that stands up to be fair, Ive made my point clear on FC3 having 15 seconds removed OR uphold 15 seconds warm-up across the board, You may lock the thread and update in the future as when.


Edited by Coxy_99
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, NineLine said:

As stated we are looking into it, but of you think calling us names, or accusing us of bias is the way to make change happen, I would ask you to rethink that approach, it has not worked well with you in the past. Please keep it constructive and mature, last warning.

Hi @NineLine,
I agree that we should treat each other with respect. However, I didn't understand why are bias accusations a problem?

There is a noticeable bias and if needed I can provide a point by point factual list. It's just a fact, nothing more and nothing less. Whether or not, this is intentional or not, I will not get into.

If "pushing" from our side to make things more correct and improve, clearly neglected Russian/Soviet hardware, is considered hostile, this is a bit worrying IMHO.
I would dare to say, that handful of us still flying MiGs and Sukhois have a responsibility to "fight" for improvements, 'cause clearly there is minimal effort exerted from ED regarding this matter.

Sure we are not the buyers of latest the NATO toys, but if there was a "red" module on offer, I am positive we would be the first ones in line to get it.

 

 

 

Cmptohocah=CMPTOHOCAH 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • ED Team

Because saying we are biased is a baseless accusation. In all honestly, and I am still trying to get to the bottom of it, the delay is more correct than the blinking, and in fact the blinking needs fixed and proper delays put in the NATO aircraft, but as I said, we are pushing for answer right now. 

 

You say Ru is neglected, but its FC3 on a whole that is not as robust or complex, and we have explained numerous times why Ru aircraft and their systems are very touchy for us, this is not biased, but us following laws and rules based on where we do business. 

 

So its easy to throw insults of bias, I know its a very popular argument in the game world, but its simply not the case. Jammers are a developing system in the F-16 and F/A-18, they have issues and we will address. 

  • Like 4

64Sig.png
Forum RulesMy YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**

1146563203_makefg(6).png.82dab0a01be3a361522f3fff75916ba4.png  80141746_makefg(1).png.6fa028f2fe35222644e87c786da1fabb.png  28661714_makefg(2).png.b3816386a8f83b0cceab6cb43ae2477e.png  389390805_makefg(3).png.bca83a238dd2aaf235ea3ce2873b55bc.png  216757889_makefg(4).png.35cb826069cdae5c1a164a94deaff377.png  1359338181_makefg(5).png.e6135dea01fa097e5d841ee5fb3c2dc5.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...