Jump to content

Do we have a Mig-29K?


T-O-A

Recommended Posts

I found a folder with the name "mig-29k" ---> C:\Program Files\Eagle Dynamics\DCS World OpenBeta\Bazar\Liveries

grafik.png

I wanted to ask if we have a K Version in the game?

As flyable part of fc3 or just as an AI.

Unfortunatly I cant find a flyable version or an AI in the game.

 

The K Version is the navy Version and would fit very good on Admiral Kusnezow

 

Thanks for help

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for feedback.

Was it just an AI or flyable module/part of the game? Maybe FC2? When was this one cut out of the game?

 

Looking at your picture the graphics looks really really awful.  But we have at the moment also an A Tomcat, an A Hornet, a Sea Hawk and some other Assets and AIs with this graphic. So why was this one removed?

 

I hope it come back some day in 2021 graphic.

I hope all the outdated assets and AI with old graphic will be removed and return with up-to-date graphic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for feedback.
Was it just an AI or flyable module/part of the game? Maybe FC2? When was this one cut out of the game?
 
Looking at your picture the graphics looks really really awful.  But we have at the moment also an A Tomcat, an A Hornet, a Sea Hawk and some other Assets and AIs with this graphic. So why was this one removed?
 
I hope it come back some day in 2021 graphic.
I hope all the outdated assets and AI with old graphic will be removed and return with up-to-date graphic.


It was flyable and landable on a carrier in flanker 2.5...
It was awesome.
  • Like 1

🖥️ R7-5800X3D 64GB RTX-4090 LG-38GN950  🥽  Valve Index 🕹️ VPForce Rhino FFB, Virpil F-14 (VFX) Grip, Virpil Alpha Grip, Virpil CM3 Throttle + Control Panel 2, Winwing Orion (Skywalker) Pedals, Razer Tartarus V2 💺SpeedMaster Flight Seat, JetSeat

CVW-17_Profile_Background_VF-103.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could give this Mod a try:

 

https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3311481/

 

  • Thanks 1

 

For work: iMac mid-2010 of 27" - Core i7 870 - 6 GB DDR3 1333 MHz - ATI HD5670 - SSD 256 GB - HDD 2 TB - macOS High Sierra

For Gaming: 34" Monitor - Ryzen 3600X - 32 GB DDR4 2400 - nVidia GTX1070ti - SSD 1.25 TB - HDD 10 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Cougar - Oculus Rift CV1

Mobile: iPad Pro 12.9" of 256 GB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, T-O-A said:

Was it just an AI or flyable module/part of the game? Maybe FC2? When was this one cut out of the game?

Not FC2, but Flanker 2 series, so talking around year 2000!

Flanker series -> LockOn(me discovering the series) -> DCS

 


Edited by unknown

Modules: KA-50, A-10C, FC3, UH-1H, MI-8MTV2, CA, MIG-21bis, FW-190D9, Bf-109K4, F-86F, MIG-15bis, M-2000C, SA342 Gazelle, AJS-37 Viggen, F/A-18C, F-14, C-101, FW-190A8, F-16C, F-5E, JF-17, SC, Mi-24P Hind, AH-64D Apache, Mirage F1, F-4E Phantom II

System: Win 11 Pro 64bit, Ryzen 3800X, 32gb RAM DDR4-3200, PowerColor Radeon RX 6900XT Red Devil ,1 x Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB NVMe, 2 x Samsung SSD 2TB + 1TB SATA, MFG Crosswind Rudder Pedals - VIRPIL T-50CM and VIRPIL MongoosT-50 Throttle - HP Reverg G2, using only the latest Open Beta, DCS settings

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The hook is invisible, deploy with left alt G

 

For work: iMac mid-2010 of 27" - Core i7 870 - 6 GB DDR3 1333 MHz - ATI HD5670 - SSD 256 GB - HDD 2 TB - macOS High Sierra

For Gaming: 34" Monitor - Ryzen 3600X - 32 GB DDR4 2400 - nVidia GTX1070ti - SSD 1.25 TB - HDD 10 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Cougar - Oculus Rift CV1

Mobile: iPad Pro 12.9" of 256 GB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Sol 1 Mihaly said:

ED will release the F-35 before they bother updating or adding russian content. 


you are new here, yet you feel well enough to post this type of empty post? You really believe that the reason why ED cant publish a modern russian fighter is because they wont bother? What are you, 12?

  • Like 6

 

For work: iMac mid-2010 of 27" - Core i7 870 - 6 GB DDR3 1333 MHz - ATI HD5670 - SSD 256 GB - HDD 2 TB - macOS High Sierra

For Gaming: 34" Monitor - Ryzen 3600X - 32 GB DDR4 2400 - nVidia GTX1070ti - SSD 1.25 TB - HDD 10 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Cougar - Oculus Rift CV1

Mobile: iPad Pro 12.9" of 256 GB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 1/11/2021 at 8:21 PM, Sol 1 Mihaly said:

ED will release the F-35 before they bother updating or adding russian content. 

I'd love an F-35 before the announced DCS: MiG-29A 9.12 is released! Somehow, I don't think that's very likely... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

... and I'm all for trying the MIG-29K's turning capabilities, as the the A variant was a bit of a let down for what I expected IRL.


Edited by Top Jockey

Hangar
FC3 | F-14A/B | F-16C | F/A-18C | MiG-21bis | Mirage 2000C ... ... JA 37 | Kfir | MiG-23 | Mirage IIIE
Mi-8 MTV2

system
i7-4790 K , 16 GB DDR3 , GTX 1660 Ti 6GB , Samsung 860 QVO 1TB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, F-2 said:

So here is a question, how accurate is Flanker 2.5s flight model? Could this be used for a resurrected Accurate mig-29k?

I believe it was a simple flight model, predecessor of the Flaming Cliffs simple flight models which we had on the FC3 planes until they were improved with the current much much more advanced and complicated (to make/understand/program) flight model. 

 

I suspect if the current 29 flight model was modified with a dash of more lift  and drag and a (8G max before things started to break) it would be far more accurate than the 2.5 model.

 

Additionally the 2.5 MiG-29K (which was supposed to be the original 1980s version of course) had the cockpit of the 9.12 or 9.13 instead of the actual original MiG-29K cockpit of which there is a beautiful 3d rendition posted on these very forums.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, SharkWizard said:

I believe it was a simple flight model, predecessor of the Flaming Cliffs simple flight models which we had on the FC3 planes until they were improved with the current much much more advanced and complicated (to make/understand/program) flight model. 

 

I suspect if the current 29 flight model was modified with a dash of more lift  and drag and a (8G max before things started to break) it would be far more accurate than the 2.5 model.

 

Additionally the 2.5 MiG-29K (which was supposed to be the original 1980s version of course) had the cockpit of the 9.12 or 9.13 instead of the actual original MiG-29K cockpit of which there is a beautiful 3d rendition posted on these very forums.

Ah well it was a nice thought. But excellent response. I think I’ve seen said artists work before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, F-2 said:

So here is a question, how accurate is Flanker 2.5s flight model? Could this be used for a resurrected Accurate mig-29k?

 

If I recal correctly, remember reading at some forum that it wasn't exactly much maneuverable or easy to fly in Flanker 2.5... that's all.

  • Like 1

Hangar
FC3 | F-14A/B | F-16C | F/A-18C | MiG-21bis | Mirage 2000C ... ... JA 37 | Kfir | MiG-23 | Mirage IIIE
Mi-8 MTV2

system
i7-4790 K , 16 GB DDR3 , GTX 1660 Ti 6GB , Samsung 860 QVO 1TB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 2/28/2021 at 9:45 PM, Top Jockey said:

 

If I recal correctly, remember reading at some forum that it wasn't exactly much maneuverable or easy to fly in Flanker 2.5... that's all.

 

... this is probably what I've read long ago:

 

" The plane ( MIG-29K ) is more difficult to fly than either version of the Flanker. You must be much gentler with the controls to avoid rapidly running out of airspeed, altitude, and options. Once, however, you get the hang of it, you'll find the MiG to be more nimble than its larger Flanker brethren. "

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20050112171138/http://archive.gamespy.com/reviews/april02/flanker/index2.shtm

 

Hangar
FC3 | F-14A/B | F-16C | F/A-18C | MiG-21bis | Mirage 2000C ... ... JA 37 | Kfir | MiG-23 | Mirage IIIE
Mi-8 MTV2

system
i7-4790 K , 16 GB DDR3 , GTX 1660 Ti 6GB , Samsung 860 QVO 1TB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/22/2021 at 12:14 AM, Top Jockey said:

 

... this is probably what I've read long ago:

 

" The plane ( MIG-29K ) is more difficult to fly than either version of the Flanker. You must be much gentler with the controls to avoid rapidly running out of airspeed, altitude, and options...

 

Which was pretty much the opposite of what it should be :) .

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Seaeagle said:

Which was pretty much the opposite of what it should be 🙂 .

 

You're probably right.

I didin't yet research much on the MiG-29K, so I don't even know what kind of flight controls, and design stabibility, the 'K' variant has.

 

Eitherway it doesn't surprise me much, it's a 20 year old flight model afterall...  

Hangar
FC3 | F-14A/B | F-16C | F/A-18C | MiG-21bis | Mirage 2000C ... ... JA 37 | Kfir | MiG-23 | Mirage IIIE
Mi-8 MTV2

system
i7-4790 K , 16 GB DDR3 , GTX 1660 Ti 6GB , Samsung 860 QVO 1TB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Top Jockey said:

 

You're probably right.

I didin't yet research much on the MiG-29K, so I don't even know what kind of flight controls, and design stabibility, the 'K' variant has.

 

Eitherway it doesn't surprise me much, it's a 20 year old flight model afterall...  

Even the first MiG-29K version had a digital fly-by-wire flight control system and the center of gravity was moved further back for "relaxed stability".

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...