Hellbat Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 I tried searching for this, but couldn't find anything. I noticed that the altitude range between the radar cursors doesn't change with the pitch of the jet (I'm running the latest stable version). For example, if I point the nose up 30 degrees, the altitude range between the cursors 20 miles away stays the same as if I were flying level. It seems to only be linked to the aircraft's altitude. I've never flown an F16 so I don't know how it really is, I always just assumed that radar elevation was with respect to the aircraft itself and not the aircraft's position in the environment, but I'm sure someone here can correct me if this assumption is wrong. Link to post Share on other sites
Donglr Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 I had the same question a few months ago and was told that the radar antenna compensates for your pitch. That actually makes sense, image you are maneuvering while trying to keep tracks on some targets, e.g. to guide a missile. Now imagine you would have to manage the radar elevation along with your actual flying and still keeping tracks of the targets - quite a work load which could easily result in a wasted missile Link to post Share on other sites
Northstar98 Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 (edited) Yes, basically every modern RADAR (including the APG-68(V)5 of the F-16CM) is effectively horizon stabilised. When you adjust the RADAR antenna elevation (which is a knob or wheel on the throttle nearly all of the time), you're doing so in relation to the horizon - obviously within the gimbal limits of the antenna. So if you have a 1 bar scan centred around 0° elevation, the RADAR will essentially scan across the horizon (as determined by aircraft instruments) regardless of aircraft attitude. Edited January 3 by Northstar98 Modules I own: F-14A/B, F/A-18C, Supercarrier, F-16CM, AJS-37, F-5E-3, MiG-21bis, Ka-50, A-10C (+ A-10C II), UH-1H, Mi-8MTV2, P-47D, P-51D, FC3, MiG-15bis, Yak-52, CA, C-101, Hawk Terrains I own: Syria, The Channel, SoH System (RIP my old PC): Dell XPS 15 9570 w/ Intel i7-8750H, NVIDIA GTX 1050Ti Max-Q, 16GB DDR4, 500GB Samsung PM871 SSD (upgraded with 1TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus SSD) VKB Gunfighter Mk.II w. MCG Pro Dreams: https://uk.pcpartpicker.com/list/mBG4dD Link to post Share on other sites
RED Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 (edited) Search modes (e.g. RWS) that are meant to detect objects at long range usually have the radar stabilized to the horizon, not only in pitch but also in roll. The reason for this is that it disconnects the searched volume from the attitude of the aircraft. So the pilot can easily visualize the searched volume and possible hits as well as doesn't have to adjust the radar with attitude changes like Donglr already explained. In some submodes even azimuth is disconnected from the aircraft attiude (not implemented yet in the Hornet). In modes (ACM modes) where the pilot is meant to already see the target, the radar is actually referencing the aircraft's attitude. That way the pilots doesn't have to manipulate the radar but can keep looking at the target and change the aircraft attitude (maneuver) to aquire a track. Edited January 3 by RED 1 476 vFG Discord | 476 vFG Website Link to post Share on other sites
Hellbat Posted January 3 Author Share Posted January 3 Cheers. That all makes sense with horizontal stabilization in RWS/TWS and relative attitude for ACM modes. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now