Jump to content

Recommended Posts

NCTR only works front aspect, as it has to see the intakes

Eagle Enthusiast, Fresco Fan. Patiently waiting for the F-15E. Clicky F-15C when?

HP Z400 Workstation

Intel Xeon W3680(i7-980X) OC'd to 4.0 GHz, EVGA GTX 1060 6GB SSC Gaming, 12 GB DDR3 RAM, 500GB Crucial MX500 SSD. Thrustmaster T16000M FCS HOTAS, DIY opentrack head-tracking. I upload DCS videos here https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0-7L3Z5nJ-QUX5M7Dh1pGg

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

The Alamo Squadron is looking for dedicated Air-to-Air focused pilots

For more detailed recruiting information, see our forums.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, dorianR666 said:

I dont know how it is now, but IIRC it used to work from behind as well in DCS hornet, simulating JEM.

JEM is modeled and working. I just tested with a hostile MiG-29 flying away from me. Before that, I tested with a hostile F-16 Blk50 (the module) both from the front and the back, but although NCTR contributed to the ROE matrix from both sides (HAFU became hostile after NCTR+IFF), the SA page still read Unknown. I guess it's an issue with some aircraft not added to the NCTR database yet.

The vCVW-17 is looking for Hornet and Tomcat pilots and RIOs. Join the vCVW-17 Discord.

1197644828_Screen_200911_044202-Copy.png.74d8c09ee9060cffd7408a75ab2c13ef.png

Z370 Aorus Gaming 7, i7-8700K, 2080Ti FTW3 Ultra, 32GB DDR4, 960 Pro, 970 Evo Plus, WD Gold 6TB, Seasonic Prime Platinum

F/A-18C, AV-8B, JF-17, A-10C (C II), M-2000C, F-16C, F-14, BS2, UH-1H, P-51D, Sptifire, FC3

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Harker said:

JEM is modeled and working. I just tested with a hostile MiG-29 flying away from me. Before that, I tested with a hostile F-16 Blk50 (the module) both from the front and the back, but although NCTR contributed to the ROE matrix from both sides (HAFU became hostile after NCTR+IFF), the SA page still read Unknown. I guess it's an issue with some aircraft not added to the NCTR database yet.

 

I'm seeing issues with the SA page 'Unknown' status under multiple scenarios. Frequently the SA page will give an unknown state when NCTR has determined hostile (as you say above), but also;

 

AZ/EL and SA Page ID's don't match up. The AZ/EL page surveillance data block will give a LINK 16 ID as e.g. MIG29 but the SA page still states Unknown for same contact. Pretty sure they should sync up. Both are Link 16 data.

 

Friendly SURV only non-PPLI contacts will almost never have an aircraft type ID. I would have thought an AWACS SURV contact (especially friendly) should have a type ID always. AWACS will know the friendly aircraft type, why doesn't it push it over the Link-16? WIP? Bug? As intended?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm confused: this thread is now labeled "Correct as is" and has the additional comment of "30 degrees off nose or tail."  In my track I'm literally about to put my nose up the Viper's tail pipe... and still no NCTR print. I'm literally dead-on nose-to-tail aspect.

i7 8700K @ Stock - Win10 64 - 32 RAM - GTX 1070 SC - 55 inch 4k Display

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...