Jump to content

Christmas 2020 Update


Recommended Posts

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year guys ! 

2020_Merry_Christmas_Banner_v2.png

 

http://leatherneck-sim.com/2020/12/22/christmas-update/

I hope you will like this one 🙂 


Edited by Hiromachi
  • Like 19
  • Thanks 3

AMD Ryzen 5900X @ 4.95 Ghz / Asus Crosshair VII X470 / 32 GB DDR4 3600 Mhz Cl16 / Radeon 6800XT / Samsung 960 EVO M.2 SSD / Creative SoundBlaster AE-9 / HP Reverb G2 / VIRPIL T-50CM /
Thrustmaster TPR Pendular Rudder Pedals / Audio Technica ATH-MSR7

Link to post
Share on other sites

Day one purchase for sure! You guys rock. Can't wait for the Crusader down the road either with the USS Forrestal coming to DCS as well. Will be a perfect fit.

 

Merry christmas to everyone at Leatherneck/M3!


Edited by Skysurfer
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Hunter but we dont provide time frames like that anymore, if this year taught us something, its that anything can happen and rescheduling would be a let down. It will be ready when it will be ready. But I can tell you that its closer than further to release now 🙂 

  • Like 7

AMD Ryzen 5900X @ 4.95 Ghz / Asus Crosshair VII X470 / 32 GB DDR4 3600 Mhz Cl16 / Radeon 6800XT / Samsung 960 EVO M.2 SSD / Creative SoundBlaster AE-9 / HP Reverb G2 / VIRPIL T-50CM /
Thrustmaster TPR Pendular Rudder Pedals / Audio Technica ATH-MSR7

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiromachi, thank you for the update -  I happily own the MiG-21 and CEII.  I am planning to own the iconic F4U in 2021 - the sooner the better!

 

Good luck with the MiG-21 updates and in completing the final stages of the F4U-1D Corsair. 

 

Merry Christmas. 

 

 

 

 

Master of None: | A-10C | P-51D | FC3 | F-86F | Ka-50 | SA342 | F-5E | UH-1H | F/A-18C | Supercarrier | F-14 | Christen Eagle II |F-16C | M-2000C | AJS-37 | AV-8B | MiG-19 | MiG-21 | I-16 | P-47D | C-101 | A-10C II | MiG-15 | L-39 | Spitfire | Mi-8MTV2 | Yak-52 | >> i7-3770K 4.5MHz(Delidded) 32GB - Vega56 - X56 HOTAS - TrackIR 5 - Tobii 5C - JetPad FSE -  <<

Link to post
Share on other sites

Amazing work guys. 

 

Although under the tarp.... *Ahem*, F-4 with nose strut extended or Su-17/20/22? The wings and spine aren't quite right for an F-4 but the tail and nose is pretty close yet the Su-17/20/22 matches the spine and fits the wings better but the nose looks a little too short and has the probe as well as the tail not seeming *quite* right. 

 

main-qimg-66301a8e406198dc002a80781f82b7Su-17%2C_technical_museum%2C_Togliatti-2

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

F-4E_Phantom_out_of_RAAF_Amberly_at_Pear

 

Nvm there are F-4s with a much smoother top to the rudder....I reckon it could almost me an F-4, but it would be an early F-4 with the shorter nose. Like an F-4B or F-4C.

Screen-Shot-2017-07-06-at-14.27.34.png

And if you *were* to drape a cloth over it the highest of the tail and the raised nose with the nose gear up for the Navy phantoms you could get that "curved" spine you see....could it be?

 

https://www.thisdayinaviation.com/tag/mcdonnell-f-4b-phantom-ii/ Image doesn't want to load so have this link to the imaged I wanted. Pretty sure its an F-4B with the leg extended. 


Edited by Southernbear
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, phant said:

Can you tell us something about the advanced damage model: it will be implemented? (if yes, on day one or through a future update?)

 

Thanks in advance!

 

 

Bye

Phant

At this moment no. New damage models are not part of SDK yet, so we have no means of implementing them. But once we will get closer to release I will have more information on that.

AMD Ryzen 5900X @ 4.95 Ghz / Asus Crosshair VII X470 / 32 GB DDR4 3600 Mhz Cl16 / Radeon 6800XT / Samsung 960 EVO M.2 SSD / Creative SoundBlaster AE-9 / HP Reverb G2 / VIRPIL T-50CM /
Thrustmaster TPR Pendular Rudder Pedals / Audio Technica ATH-MSR7

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Southernbear said:

Although under the tarp.... *Ahem*, F-4 with nose strut extended or Su-17/20/22? The wings and spine aren't quite right for an F-4 but the tail and nose is pretty close yet the Su-17/20/22 matches the spine and fits the wings better but the nose looks a little too short and has the probe as well as the tail not seeming *quite* right. 

 

Yes, my thoughts exactly!

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Lurker said:

That's a Su-17\22 under there or I'm father Christmas. Nice, we need more strikers especially Redfor strikers. 

+1

Module: viel zu viele...

Warte auf: Fulda Gap, MiG-23, xy (4th. Gen RED) und mehr neue und alte Propeller wie P-38, Corsair, DC-3, Transall, Tucano usw.

 

Projekt: OpenFlightSchool -> Thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Su-17 Family plane will be great, I am really happy! Thank you!

 

unknown2.pngunknown1.png


Edited by FoxAlfa
  • Like 3

-------

 

All the people keep asking for capabilities to be modelled.... I want the limitations to be modelled.... limitations make for realistic simulation.

 

Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud, after a bit you realize the pig likes it.

 

Long time ago in galaxy far far away:

https://www.deviantart.com/alfafox/gallery

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion the windscreen of the covered aircraft is a way too far from the nose for any Su-17 derivative (at least seen from that angle). Proportions-wise it's closer to one of twn-seater MiG-21 variants to me, although bulges on the nose don't match either.

 

Doesn't matter though. The F4U shots have stolen the whole show!

  • Like 1

i7 9700K @ stock speed, single GTX1070, 32 gigs of RAM, TH Warthog, MFG Crosswind, Win10.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...