Jump to content

F-15E UFC poll


F-15E UFC poll  

1200 members have voted

  1. 1. F-15E UFC poll

    • Analog (old)
      353
    • Digital (new)
      847


Recommended Posts

I'm absolutely on the hype train for the f15e, love this aircraft, may be my most wanted American aircraft for DCS.

But that aside, razbam did say in a podcast if I recall, that this module may release this year, I don't know if it is the right place to seek answers but is it still feasable?

Full fidelity su27/mig29 ?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 229
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Still so sad about the UFC becoming digital instead analog. That analog would have fitted so much better to the game and its era.

Only analog! Like in the F-15 Strike Eagle III and Jane's!

I prefer the old one.

My god.... most of you voted for that digital crap? I‘m more and more disappointed reg. this community every day.

FC3, Ka-50, A-10C, AJS-37, MiG-21bis, F-14A/B, F/A-18C, F-16C, NTTR, Persian Gulf, Super Carrier, TacView Advanced

Next in line: F-5 II , MiG-19 , MiG-23 MLA

Wishlist: PA-100 Tornado, F-104 Starfighter, MiG-25 Foxbat, A-6 Intruder

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps the OP should have provided some context beyond the simple analog/digital keywords.

 

If I understood correctly, the old UFC was only getting replaced starting from 2010 so realistically that would put Razbam's F-15E into the scenarios placed within the last ten years (thus, not even matching the in-game F16 and F/A-18 which are from mid 2000s).

 

On the other hand, it probably took years before all the UFCs were upgraded so an analog UFC would be valid for most of the 2010s as well.

 

So, going with the digital one makes no sense, IMHO. If anything, it should be provided as an option over the analog one and not as the sole variant.


Edited by Dudikoff

i386DX40@42 MHz w/i387 CP, 4 MB RAM (8*512 kB), Trident 8900C 1 MB w/16-bit RAMDAC ISA, Quantum 340 MB UDMA33, SB 16, DOS 6.22 w/QEMM + Win3.11CE, Quickshot 1btn 2axis, Numpad as hat. 2 FPH on a good day, 1 FPH avg.

 

DISCLAIMER: My posts are still absolutely useless. Just finding excuses not to learn the F-14 (HB's Swansong?).

 

Annoyed by my posts? Please consider donating. Once the target sum is reached, I'll be off to somewhere nice I promise not to post from. I'd buy that for a dollar!

Link to post
Share on other sites
My god.... most of you voted for that digital crap? I‘m more and more disappointed reg. this community every day.

 

 

It's the modern version of the F-15 so digital isn't really a bad way to go.

 

 

Like you I want an F-104, actually I want an F-104 more than any other plane, now that one we know ain't gonna be digital.

 

 

We need the classic century fighters!

Some of the planes, but all of the maps!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Poll has aready the answer. :D

New system:I9-9900KS, Kingston 64 GB DDR4 3200Mhz, RTX 3080(OC 2070 Mhz), Corsair H150 Pro RGB, Samsung 970 EVO 1 Tb, Scandisk m2 500 MB, 2 x Crucial 1 Tb, T16000M HOTAS, HP Reverb Professional, Corsair 750 Watt.

 

Old system:I7-4770K(OC 4.5Ghz), Kingston 24 GB DDR3 1600 Mhz,MSI RTX 2080(OC 2070 Mhz), 2 * 500 GB SSD, 3,5 TB HDD, 55' Samsung 3d tv, Trackir 5, Logitech HD Cam, T16000M HOTAS. All DCS modules, maps and campaigns:pilotfly:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi all,

 

 

 

As you know we are planing on the Suite 4+ Eagle, which had two types of UFC depending on the Age.

 

 

 

The first being this one :

 

38817512_1820269301393033_468552980346437632_n.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

and the more modern version being this one:

 

uT1BPVm.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

Now its UP TO YOU which version we create. Have you say in the poll attached. we will run this for 2 weeks

The screen one for sure. Love it!!

 

Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if this has already been mentioned earlier, but functionally there is NO difference between the old and new UFCs. It just replaces the display part, not the actual switches. It is not a fancy touchscreen controller like the Superbug's, or have any other function than displaying numbers, letters, and characters in fixed locations.

 

Basically, they replaced LEDs with LCDs.

 

Vulture

Link to post
Share on other sites

I fly F-15E sims for a living (test engineer) and you can relax about not having a WSO - you can do 99% of the system actions from the front seat - but the HOTAS does get a bit complicated!

 

Or jump in the pit and put the jet on A/P and work the systems from there - easier for air-to-ground but you will need a HOTAS stick (left and right hand controller, to be exact) for each hand, plus stick and throttles, so it gets busy there too if you are trying to fly and work the systems at the same time.

 

You still need to be in the front for gear, flaps, master mode and master arm, but landing from the back is fun once configured.

 

LANTIRN or SNIPER? Sniper is sooooo much better!

 

Vulture

Link to post
Share on other sites

Old, because it opens missions eras and match more with everything else.

 

No better performance with digital than just look...

 

Would make the strike eagle look nicer and special with old...

 

But again the community is full of "I want latest so I can win....".

i7-8700k, 32GB 2666Mhz DDR4, 2x 2080S SLI 8GB, Oculus Rift S.

i7-8700k, 16GB 2666Mhz DDR4, 1080Ti 11GB, 27" 4K, 65" HDR 4K.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Perhaps the OP should have provided some context beyond the simple analog/digital keywords.

 

If I understood correctly, the old UFC was only getting replaced starting from 2010 so realistically that would put Razbam's F-15E into the scenarios placed within the last ten years (thus, not even matching the in-game F16 and F/A-18 which are from mid 2000s).

 

On the other hand, it probably took years before all the UFCs were upgraded so an analog UFC would be valid for most of the 2010s as well.

 

So, going with the digital one makes no sense, IMHO. If anything, it should be provided as an option over the analog one and not as the sole variant.

THIS THIS THIS ALL OF THIS!

 

 

#noSciFi-F15 !

Link to post
Share on other sites
Sorry if this has already been mentioned earlier, but functionally there is NO difference between the old and new UFCs. It just replaces the display part, not the actual switches. It is not a fancy touchscreen controller like the Superbug's, or have any other function than displaying numbers, letters, and characters in fixed locations.

 

Basically, they replaced LEDs with LCDs.

 

Vulture

 

in that case it should be fairly easy to make it an option, so everybody is happy : )

would also prefer the red digits...

Link to post
Share on other sites
in that case it should be fairly easy to make it an option, so everybody is happy : )

would also prefer the red digits...

 

If it's a cosmetic change only and there are no weapon and avionic systems changed accordingly then it should be offered as an option. What's the point of changing its appearance but not the systems behind it?. It's like having a Ford mondeo with a fake Ferrari body. It may look like a Ferrari but it's still a Ford.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I agree. I'm disappointed as well.

 

 

And me. But I don't really care. At least it seems that this time, we're actually getting the F-15E. Hope it will not take another few years, after all, it's being in development since at least 2011 afair.

B450 Gaming Pro Carbon AC, Ryzen 3600, 32Gb DDR4 3600MHz, GTX1070Ti, CH Stuff, Oculus CV1

 

Wishlist:

AH-64

F-15E

F-117A

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...