Jump to content

Has Deka decided yet? What's their next module?


Recommended Posts

A chopper would sit right with me.

The Kamov designed CAIC Z-10 t or WZ-10 would put these fellas on the map.


Edited by Rogue Trooper

HP pro Reverb.

Current settings:

Windows VR setting: IPD is 64.5mm, High image quality, 90Hz refresh rate.

Steam: VR SS set to 100%, motionReprojectionMode set to "motionreproduction" and Locked in at 45 Hz display,

DCS: Pixel Density 1.0, Forced IPD at 55 (perceived world size), 2 X MSAA, 0 X SSAA.

My real IPD is 64.5mm. Prescription VROptition lenses installed.

VR Driver system:

I9-9900KS 5Ghz CPU. XI Hero motherboard and 2080ti graphics card, 32 gigs Ram 3

[code][code][code][code]

[/code][/code][/code][/code]200 Hz. No OC at the mo.

Link to post
Share on other sites
A chopper would sit right with me.

The Kamov designed CAIC Z-10 t or WZ-10 would put these fellas on the map.

 

Kamov designed? I see, you got that from another one of those british webpages. Go to Kamov and see if they can offer you any info on Z-10 at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I saw that too. That's not "according to Kamov". It's a US based media called AIN online.

And that news in webachieve, means deleted. Just like when brits Jane's deleted the comment about how J-10 is Lavi. They made a sensational claim to attract reader, but has no evidence to back it up. That's why they had to delete it.

 

As far as I know, China did benefit it from project 941, a project initiated by China in 1994 with the help of Russian Kamov (China paid them $3 million for that, mostly for their testing facility). But after the wooden model was tested in a wind tunnel in 1996 (see picture below).

Russia left the project and never involved again ever since. And Z-10 made its first flight in 29 April 2003. Through 1996 to 2003, Russia didn't tough a thing.

 

unNLoEx.png


Edited by J-20
Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s still live https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/defense/2013-03-15/kamov-reveals-involvement-chinas-z-10-attack-helicopter

 

Reported elsewhere like Flight Global, and references an actual announcement from a real person who showed pictures of wind test models. Would be a pretty elaborate hoax

 

Im not saying it isn’t Chinese, I’m just seems to be pretty credible that the initial concept and design including verification by wind tunnel models was done by Kamov, and Harbin then actually turned that into a real helicopter and did all manufacturing design changes everything else. They paid Kamov for It, no harm in that, it’s still a very important milestone in indigenous Chinese attack helicopters

 

So I don’t think Rogue Trooper was necessarily technically wrong, and they definitely feel positive about such a helicopter, it would be very interesting to see how it stacks up to Ka-50 that has much more armor and if Z-10 is really more agile despite conventional rotor design. They definitely went for more of a Scout helicopter approach, I know they wanted Gazelles with HOT missiles and one point, it would almost be a modern filler of the gap between Ka-50/Mi-24 and Kiowa/Gazelle

 

But it has those MFDs, darn:)

 

EDIT: okay I see your edit. Yeah basic blue prints and verification then total hand over. Yeah some people might blow it up and belittle Harbin/PLA involvement, but they just misunderstand and conflate the early cooperation that did happen all those years before flight test


Edited by AeriaGloria
Link to post
Share on other sites

All this off topic patriotic drama aside, I would love a large bomber or transport plane for a next module.

 

A dedicated ground attacker would also be nice.

  • Like 1

Current Hangar : A-10C II ¦ AJS-37 ¦ A/V-8B ¦ F-14A/B ¦ F/A-18C ¦ FC3 ¦ JF-17 ¦ Ka-50 ¦ Mi-8 ¦ M2000-C ¦ SA342 ¦ UH-1H

 

Other Modules : Combined Arms ¦ Persian Gulf

 

TRAINED - LEARNING - UNTOUCHED - ABANDONED

Link to post
Share on other sites
All this off topic patriotic drama aside, I would love a large bomber or transport plane for a next module.

 

A dedicated ground attacker would also be nice.

 

Who would want a transport?

 

Also, I don't think there was any patriotic drama.

Why would people call Z-10 a Russian design when they only did $3 million worth of testing work? After taking $3 million, they spend 2 years just to build a wooden model for testing, and all of a sudden that's a Russia design? What are they? Vitamin B6 deficient?

People trying to correct it is not a patriotic drama.

 

Just give you an idea how little $3 million is, the design project of Apache cost $11 billion. A single Apache's fly away price is $33 million.


Edited by PLAAF
  • Like 1

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

ASM for Su-27 in DCS

Link to post
Share on other sites
Is Deka fixed on Chinese and eastern Aircraft?

 

I would love to see a F4 Phantom, and I think Deka would be the guys able to do it right! Still not happy that the Mudhen went to Razbam...

 

F-4E has on progress officially by ED.

 

RAZBAM never a planned a F-4, get down the drama.

 

Deka has a Chinese team, they has intente build exclusive and associate national modules.

 

Enviado desde mi RNE-L21 mediante Tapatalk


Edited by Silver_Dragon

More news to the front

Wishlist: ED / 3rd Party Campaings

My Rig: Intel I-5 750 2.67Ghz / Packard Bell FMP55 / 16 GB DDR3 RAM / GTX-1080 8 GB RAM / HD 1Tb/2Tb / Warthog / 2 MDF / TFPR

 

DCS: Roadmap (unofficial):https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=116893

DCS: List of Vacant models: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=4076891#post4076891

21Squad DCS: World News: https://www.facebook.com/21Squad-219508958071000/

Silver_Dragon Youtube

Link to post
Share on other sites
Who would want a transport?

 

Also, I don't think there was any patriotic drama.

Why would people call Z-10 a Russian design when they only did $3 million worth of testing work? After taking $3 million, they spend 2 years just to build a wooden model for testing, and all of a sudden that's a Russia design? What are they? Vitamin B6 deficient?

People trying to correct it is not a patriotic drama.

 

Just give you an idea how little $3 million is, the design project of Apache cost $11 billion. A single Apache's fly away price is $33 million.

 

I would like to get one properly designed transport airframe. I suppose they wont sell too well. Shame really.

 

Furthermore, I will buy any helicopter made from China. I have seen some documentaries. They are quite capable machines.

Current Hangar : A-10C II ¦ AJS-37 ¦ A/V-8B ¦ F-14A/B ¦ F/A-18C ¦ FC3 ¦ JF-17 ¦ Ka-50 ¦ Mi-8 ¦ M2000-C ¦ SA342 ¦ UH-1H

 

Other Modules : Combined Arms ¦ Persian Gulf

 

TRAINED - LEARNING - UNTOUCHED - ABANDONED

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

 

Kamov designed? I see, you got that from another one of those british webpages. Go to Kamov and see if they can offer you any info on Z-10 at all.

 

yes.

The chinese wanted to produce a kamov attack chopper and Kamov being an intelligent company realised very quickly that the Chinese would simply take the first production run, reverse engineer it and manufacture it for them selves.

So they only agreed to design a new chopper for them under contract.

 

Only one of us is deluded.... I wonder which one?

HP pro Reverb.

Current settings:

Windows VR setting: IPD is 64.5mm, High image quality, 90Hz refresh rate.

Steam: VR SS set to 100%, motionReprojectionMode set to "motionreproduction" and Locked in at 45 Hz display,

DCS: Pixel Density 1.0, Forced IPD at 55 (perceived world size), 2 X MSAA, 0 X SSAA.

My real IPD is 64.5mm. Prescription VROptition lenses installed.

VR Driver system:

I9-9900KS 5Ghz CPU. XI Hero motherboard and 2080ti graphics card, 32 gigs Ram 3

[code][code][code][code]

[/code][/code][/code][/code]200 Hz. No OC at the mo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Deka mentioned it as a possibility. You wouldn't buy it?

 

H-6 that is a license built Tu-16, a strategic bomber and recon aircraft.

What does a DCS have to offer for strategic bombers in their current maps?

 

Let's talk about strategic bombers in 10 year time if we get a general earth modeled so we can offer someone a change to fly 2000 km for one direction just to launch a few cruise missiles and then fly back to base.

This is the same problem that why MiG-25 is not fit for DCS, as what it is just a long range interceptor against high altitude, high speed bombers and recon aircrafts. When your turn circle will be closer to 20 km then it is not even funny to think these to be piloted in cold war era DCS.

 

These are as facinating as SR-71 would be developed to DCS, you just have no place to fly or operate one.

  • Confused 1

i7-8700k, 32GB 2666Mhz DDR4, 2x 2080S SLI 8GB, Oculus Rift S.

i7-8700k, 16GB 2666Mhz DDR4, 1080Ti 11GB, 27" 4K, 65" HDR 4K.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Who would want a transport?

 

I would take a transport if it is for tactical use, not for strategical.

Meaning a nice C-2 Greyhound would be nice one, or even a An-8 or An-74.

 

Smaller cargo aircrafts would be welcomed even more.

C-23 Sherpa

Dornier 228

Cessna SkyCourier 408

An-2MC

 

But before anything, we would need to have capability transport personnel, weapons, liquids and parts etc all over places. Even if it is just from one airport to some other airport, there would be enough tasks for many to fly.

i7-8700k, 32GB 2666Mhz DDR4, 2x 2080S SLI 8GB, Oculus Rift S.

i7-8700k, 16GB 2666Mhz DDR4, 1080Ti 11GB, 27" 4K, 65" HDR 4K.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
9 hours ago, Mike_Romeo said:

スクリーンショット_20210121-071651_Discord.jpg

I was surprised to see Su-30MKK as a candidate for the project. I would love to see them take on this challenge, even if it takes some time...

  • Like 1

戦闘機のパイロットは映画を作り、爆撃機のパイロットは歴史を作ります。

Ryzen7 3800 X @ 8x4.5GHz / 64GB DDR4-3200 RAM / Nvidia Geforce RTX3060(GDDR6 12GB VRAM)/ Windows 10 Home 64Bit / Saitek X-56 / Saitek X-65F / Track IR

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • BIGNEWY locked and unlocked this topic

I Have deleted the arguing from the thread, 

 

A reminder to all, treat each other with respect or do not post. 

 

if you have a problem with the forum, moderation, or another user please feel free to PM us directly

 

thank you

smallCATPILOT.PNG.04bbece1b27ff1b2c193b174ec410fc0.PNG

Forum rules - DCS Crashing? Try this first - Cleanup and Repair - Discord BIGNEWY#8703 - Youtube - Patch Status

Windows 10 Pro x64, NVIDIA MSI RTX 2080Ti VENTUS GP, Intel® i9-10900K 3.70GHz, 5.30GHz Turbo, Corsair Hydro Series H150i Pro, 32GB DDR @3000, ASUS ROG Strix Z490-F Gaming, HP Reverb G2

Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, Admiral_ZIPANGU said:

I was surprised to see Su-30MKK as a candidate for the project. I would love to see them take on this challenge, even if it takes some time...

 

Yup! Having a Su-30MKK, even as AI would be interesting. Hopefully they can do FF, but like you said: it'll take time, and a lot of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be thrilled with any of these. Q-5 plus Razbams Mig-23 would give us a red strike and fighter team even if they never actually worked together. Were over due for a modern red fighter for the Su-30. J-8 is just cool. But if I had to choose one it would be the H-6. It would be a completely new role in DCS, we've seen now you can do more than 2 person multicrew, and it would give blue carrier groups something to think about.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...