Jump to content

How resource intensive is the F14 compared with other modules?


MobiSev

Recommended Posts

How could we know?

 

the devs would know....people who tested it could know


Edited by MobiSev

Modules owned:

 

FC3, M-2000C, Mig-21bis, F-5E, AJS-37 Viggen, F/A-18C, KA-50, Mi-8, F-14A&B, JF-17

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a 1:1 basis versus the Hornet, expect 7-15% less performance.

 

When placing 20 Tomcats on the Tarmac versus 20 Hornets and looking at them from a distance, expect the Tomcat scene to perform 70-200% better.

 

We wanted to run detailed benchmarks but we've ran out of time unfortunately.

 

Expect it to be more resource intensive across the board. Generally, we tried to design the product to be truly next-gen and futureproof.

Nicholas Dackard

 

Founder & Lead Artist

Heatblur Simulations

 

https://www.facebook.com/heatblur/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a 1:1 basis versus the Hornet, expect 7-15% less performance.

 

When placing 20 Tomcats on the Tarmac versus 20 Hornets and looking at them from a distance, expect the Tomcat scene to perform 70-200% better.

 

We wanted to run detailed benchmarks but we've ran out of time unfortunately.

 

Expect it to be more resource intensive across the board. Generally, we tried to design the product to be truly next-gen and futureproof.

 

 

Nice that won't break the processing power bank when it comes to VR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dunno, In many VR scenarios I'm running its a dog... 30fps or less. It does hold 45 over water fine though. But I've got a low end rig.

New hotness: I7 9700k 4.8ghz, 32gb ddr4, 2080ti, :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, HP Reverb (formermly CV1)

Old-N-busted: i7 4720HQ ~3.5GHZ, +32GB DDR3 + Nvidia GTX980m (4GB VRAM) :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, Rift CV1 (yes really).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4k flatscreen, native 4k resolution

 

noticeable FPS drop near ground level, but not noticeably more than any other module, including the F18.

 

Loading time is roughly the same as well. But there is a 4-5s freeze of blackscreen behind the briefing page before the game starts.

 

2080, i7700k, 32gb 3200mhz ram, 1tb NVMe SSD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At my PC:

 

In cockpit, 30-40% less fps than F-18C.

Loading times are about 10x loading times of F-18C

 

GF970 + i53570k + 16gb ram + ssd. Medium settings.

 

 

can confirm

i7-6800k | 32GB G.Skill RipJaws V DDR4-3200 | 8GB GeForce GTX 1080 | Win10pro x64 | Oculus Rift | Hotas Warthog | Logitech G Saitek PRO Flight Rudder Pedals

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...