Jump to content

ED agreed...The Mig 21 "CAN" be added ONLY IF...


Witchking

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 301
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Image-0085.png

 

from here the cone looks a bit wrong. it seems that your goes streight, but in the close-ups i've seen there's a little "bump" in the slope at its foundation..

also the tailfin is still missing some antennas (also bump-shaped that stick out form it's sides) it seems

Never forget that World War III was not Cold for most of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest IguanaKing

There are all kinds of probes and ports at the front of the aircraft that are missing too, but, try to remember that this model is a work in progress. Try to read the whole thread before making additional suggestions. Hell...its only recently that he put wings on the damn thing...let's try to keep up and help the guy build the aircraft. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we already have a flanker in game.....his model can just replace that. The issue with the mig is that it NEEDS to get integrated in game...hence I really appreciate that he is making it his priority. :D

WHISPR | Intel I7 5930K | Nvidia GTX980 4GB GDDR5 | 16GB DDR4 | Intel 730 series 512GB SSD | Thrustmaster WARTHOG | CH Pro Pedals | TrackIR4 pro |

|A-10C|BS2 |CA|P-51 MUSTANG|UH-1H HUEY|MI-8 MTV2 |FC3|F5E|M2000C|AJS-37|FW190|BF 109K|Mig21|A-10:SSC,EWC|L-39|NEVADA|

Link to comment
Share on other sites

re missing parts:

 

Maybe its not so obvious in the pic, but I work only on one half of the frame, the other half is just a mirrored object. All borderline details (centreline when the 2 sides are welded) will be done only when the 2 sides are welded.

 

Re. poly count, yes its approaching 50k but this is how i work, like my flanker, every thing at high poly, then at the optimization stage I keep the high poly for the tight curved parts like nose , cones, front edge of wing..etc, and dramatically remove polys from flat and semi flat areas.

 

For ex. the following pic. shows a cutout of the wing/wing base. Cloned then optimized. One of the objects below is only 50% poly count of the other. ;)

 

Image-0087.png

 

 

Finally, its Work in progress, comments are appreciated for what is done and how they should be fixed if they need to. Not for what is missing!!!!, After all if nothing is missing then the thing should be "Release" and not " Work in progress"

  • Like 1
sig3small320x1503vh3.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aye-yi-yi... 50K polygons. That'll hurt the framerate. Any chance of a de-tesselated (lower-poly) model for us with older systems?

 

Around 50K its the ED recomandation. Su-25T has around 50K polys. If you want a low poly model why don't you stick with the default model after all?

 

I bet the new F15 from Walmis has around 50K...

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

I5 4670k, 32GB, GTX 1070, Thrustmaster TFRP, G940 Throttle extremely modded with Bodnar 0836X and Bu0836A,

Warthog Joystick with F-18 grip, Oculus Rift S - Almost all is made from gifts from friends, the most expensive parts at least

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strike, has this site been published on this post?

 

http://agency92.cz/galerie.php?a=akce&akce=22

 

I don't think so. This is the first time I see this. VERY nice and helpful closeups. Thanks

 

 

And for those who are too much concerned about the poly count, even before I finish the project , cheerup and have a good look at this:

 

Image-26k.png

 

This is the 26k poly. version of the work. You can hardly spot any significant degradation in the mesh. So trust me, the whole project is under controle and the final poly count is a decision related issue.

 

cheers

sig3small320x1503vh3.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

did you read his post? He said that he likes to work with higher poly, and then optimize it. And with proper lods, even with 50k model, fps shouldnt take a big hit. ;)

Crikey, you're right, I haven't. My bad. :doh:

Around 50K its the ED recomandation. Su-25T has around 50K polys. If you want a low poly model why don't you stick with the default model after all?

Um... what default model? This is the first of its kind.

 

This is the 26k poly. version of the work. You can hardly spot any significant degradation in the mesh. So trust me, the whole project is under controle and the final poly count is a decision related issue.

Thanks for soothing my fears.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Real men fly ground attack :pilotfly: where EVERYTHING wants a piece of you :D
Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol maybe we should make this as the damage model. Hows that for too much poly.

 

And this:

 

http://www1.airliners.net/open.file?id=0772434&WxsIERv=Zvxblna-Therivpu%20ZvT-21...&Wm=0&WdsYXMg=Nstunavfgna%20-%20Nve%20Sbepr&QtODMg=Ontenz%20%28BNVK%29&ERDLTkt=Nstunavfgna&ktODMp=Qrprzore%2023%2C%202004&BP=1&WNEb25u=Ervxn&xsIERvdWdsY=&MgTUQtODMgKE=%22Nynfxn%22%20jnf%20urer%21%20Ybbx%20ng%20gur%20bgure%20Ontenz%20cvpgherf%20gb%20frr%20ubj%20snfg%20guvf%20%22tenssvgv-svtugre%22%20unir%20qrgrevbengrq.&YXMgTUQtODMgKERD=10507&NEb25uZWxs=2005-02-06%2019%3A34%3A36&ODJ9dvCE=&O89Dcjdg=&static=yes&width=1024&height=780&sok=JURER%20%20%28nvepensg_trarevp%20%3D%20%27Zvxblna-Therivpu%20ZvT-21%27%29%20%20BEQRE%20OL%20ivrjf%20QRFP&photo_nr=14&prev_id=0305645&next_id=1040936

 

http://www1.airliners.net/open.file?id=0294858&WxsIERv=Zvxblna-Therivpu%20ZvT-21...&Wm=0&WdsYXMg=Nstunavfgna%20-%20Nve%20Sbepr&QtODMg=Ontenz%20%28BNVK%29&ERDLTkt=Nstunavfgna&ktODMp=Nhthfg%202002&BP=0&WNEb25u=Xriva%20Znffn&xsIERvdWdsY=&MgTUQtODMgKE=&YXMgTUQtODMgKERD=6987&NEb25uZWxs=2002-11-17%2000%3A00%3A00&ODJ9dvCE=&O89Dcjdg=&static=yes&width=1024&height=780&sok=JURER%20%20%28nvepensg_trarevp%20%3D%20%27Zvxblna-Therivpu%20ZvT-21%27%29%20%20BEQRE%20OL%20ivrjf%20QRFP&photo_nr=37&prev_id=0305438&next_id=0294856

 

http://www1.airliners.net/open.file?id=0294857&WxsIERv=Zvxblna-Therivpu%20ZvT-21...&Wm=0&WdsYXMg=Nstunavfgna%20-%20Nve%20Sbepr&QtODMg=Ontenz%20%28BNVK%29&ERDLTkt=Nstunavfgna&ktODMp=Nhthfg%202002&BP=0&WNEb25u=Xriva%20Znffn&xsIERvdWdsY=&MgTUQtODMgKE=&YXMgTUQtODMgKERD=4706&NEb25uZWxs=2002-11-17%2000%3A00%3A00&ODJ9dvCE=&O89Dcjdg=&static=yes&width=1024&height=780&sok=JURER%20%20%28nvepensg_trarevp%20%3D%20%27Zvxblna-Therivpu%20ZvT-21%27%29%20%20beqre%20ol%20ivrjf%20QRFP&photo_nr=77&prev_id=0705489&next_id=0365683

Give me "flying telephone pole" (SA-2)!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...