grunf Posted February 6, 2017 Share Posted February 6, 2017 (edited) Since we now have ELINT, I recon we should have a ELINT database too :D. Here is a preliminary version of raw data I've gathered so far. More to follow... https://www.dropbox.com/s/ukxjmr5ymnuoz19/elint.pdf?dl=0 ELINT fail: :D Edited February 6, 2017 by grunf 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edineygomes Posted February 6, 2017 Share Posted February 6, 2017 Since we now have ELINT, I recon we should have a ELINT database too :D. Here is a preliminary version of raw data I've gathered so far. More to follow... https://www.dropbox.com/s/ukxjmr5ymnuoz19/elint.pdf?dl=0 ELINT fail: :D Nice ! :thumbup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mambo Posted February 6, 2017 Share Posted February 6, 2017 Great, thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BritTorrent Posted February 6, 2017 Share Posted February 6, 2017 Nice one! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grunf Posted February 6, 2017 Author Share Posted February 6, 2017 BTW, this can be also useful during the flight, to decipher the RWR sounds. For example, if you hear 400Hz tone 1,5s long, with 8,5s pause in between, you can tell this is the Early Warning Radar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullitthead Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 So cool, looking forward to messing with this! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RagnarDa Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 I was looking forward to the moment when the community would start doing research on this. You did notice that the PRF-frequency is the actual tone as you hear it in the cockpit? The carrier-frequency and PRF is automatically estimated from the max detection range of the radar so it supports new units added to DCS. I am very proud of the RWR in the Viggen. 1 DCS AJS37 HACKERMAN There will always be bugs. If everything is a priority nothing is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scaflight Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 I've actually started recording radars from the Viggen with precisely the aim to publish and learn threats, but I've had varying levels of success. I can't get the SA-6's systems to register at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RagnarDa Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 Do the lights show or do you get nothing? DCS AJS37 HACKERMAN There will always be bugs. If everything is a priority nothing is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lemoen Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 The SA-10s also don't always play a tone when they launch on you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scaflight Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 (edited) Do the lights show or do you get nothing? Most of the time I get nothing, some of the time I'll get the search radar but no CW/launch signal. In fact I've never gotten the CW signal from the SA-6. This is with larm knob in right position, and due care to RWR blindzones. Edited February 7, 2017 by scaflight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sim Flyer Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 The SA-10s also don't always play a tone when they launch on you. I think that is realistic enough, as far as i know the SA10 is capable of launching at you without triggering the launch warning on the RWR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuiGon Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 (edited) I was looking forward to the moment when the community would start doing research on this. You did notice that the PRF-frequency is the actual tone as you hear it in the cockpit? The carrier-frequency and PRF is automatically estimated from the max detection range of the radar so it supports new units added to DCS. I am very proud of the RWR in the Viggen. This is indeed great stuff. I didn't expect this! :thumbup: So apparently the ground radars in DCS are modeled more in-depth than I thought and provide stuff like frequencies and so on. Doesn't this allow for a more advanced jamming model in DCS than we have now? Currently all jammers and jamming modes in DCS are all the same and jam all kind of radar signals. But if ground radars do have stuff like frequencies modeled it should be possible to create more advanced jammers (or jamming modes) that only jam certain frequency ranges or stuff like that. Or am I totally wrong here? Edit: Disregard. I should read better. :doh: That stuff is not part of the units as they are in DCS, but is added by LNS' code based on the ranges of the various radars... :music_whistling: Edited February 7, 2017 by QuiGon Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schmidtfire Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 I recorded an Sa-8 last night, landed and rearmed with BK90s. When I was entering a new target waypoint from the kneeboard, I discovered that the ELINT coordinates had NW and SE (I think). What happened was that I had more digits for the new waypoint than I could input into the CK-37. (usually it is displayed with 2x6 digits for N and E) And sure enough, I only managed to get a waypoint to the general area. Is it possible to enter the exact coordinates as displayed on the ELINT page? I dont know if this is possible, but my idea would be to get the exact coordinates and then do a stand-off attack with the BK90s in a wide area mode without actually spotting the target visually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ward8124 Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 Need to get the database in to a kneeboard page ASAP.....when it's fixed that is. EVGA GTX1080TISC2 Black Hybrid Cooler, Asus Strix X399, Water cooled ThreadRipper 1920X, Dominator 32GB 3200Mhz,NVME Samsung 250/500GB SSDs, Corsair Air 740 case, Acer Predator 34' Gsync curved display + 3x Alienware 23inch 120hz monitors. TM HOTAS, RAZER - Tiamat,Blackwidow, Mamba, Tartarus and Oculus Rift CV1/DK2 + TrackIR5, MFG crosswinds Oh and a very understanding wife. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grunf Posted February 7, 2017 Author Share Posted February 7, 2017 I recorded an Sa-8 last night, landed and rearmed with BK90s. When I was entering a new target waypoint from the kneeboard, I discovered that the ELINT coordinates had NW and SE (I think). What happened was that I had more digits for the new waypoint than I could input into the CK-37. (usually it is displayed with 2x6 digits for N and E) And sure enough, I only managed to get a waypoint to the general area. Is it possible to enter the exact coordinates as displayed on the ELINT page? I dont know if this is possible, but my idea would be to get the exact coordinates and then do a stand-off attack with the BK90s in a wide area mode without actually spotting the target visually. ELINT doesn't give you a pinpoint location, but a rectangular area in which the emission source is located. The coordinates you get are the two points of that rectangle, the NW and SE. The size of the rectangle is determined by the quality of your recording - if you approach from just one direction, the area will be pretty large, but if you go around it, you'll have a better triangulation and a much smaller area. Need to get the database in to a kneeboard page ASAP.....when it's fixed that is. Absolutely. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
funkyfranky Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 Since we now have ELINT, I recon we should have a ELINT database too Jolly good! Thank you, grunf :thumbup: A warrior's mission is to foster the success of others. i9-12900K | MSI RTX 3080Ti Suprim X | 128 GB Ram 3200 MHz DDR-4 | MSI MPG Edge Z690 | Samung EVO 980 Pro SSD | Virpil Stick, Throttle and Collective | MFG Crosswind | HP Reverb G2 RAT - On the Range - Rescue Helo - Recovery Tanker - Warehouse - Airboss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grunf Posted February 7, 2017 Author Share Posted February 7, 2017 I was looking forward to the moment when the community would start doing research on this. You did notice that the PRF-frequency is the actual tone as you hear it in the cockpit? The carrier-frequency and PRF is automatically estimated from the max detection range of the radar so it supports new units added to DCS. I am very proud of the RWR in the Viggen. Yeah, I noticed :). At first the RWR may seem like an annoying beeper, but once you figure how it works it's a very good system. And you did a good job with the implementation. :thumbup: One question: what is a difference between PRF A and B? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ice_Cougar Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 Yeah, I noticed :). At first the RWR may seem like an annoying beeper, but once you figure how it works it's a very good system. And you did a good job with the implementation. :thumbup: One question: what is a difference between PRF A and B? I entirely agree. Its an amazingly well-modeled system! :D I believe I saw this on a google slide (Shown to me by RagnarDa):https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1cRKo8IY4GF8bXhUq8LJeRJKLc4oXJwwLeUp2_xXy7C8/edit ...PRF A and B just tell you which "crystal" is recieving the transmissions to better tell the range of PRF being recorded. Freq A = Receiver probably uses a couple of crystal video receivers, so they don't know the exact freq its on, but they do know which of the tuned crystal receivers is picking up the signal. So in this case it translate to RF band "A". Can be used to ID the signal. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RagnarDa Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 ELINT database The carrier frequency (not the Pulse Repetition Frequency) is grouped into two categories in Viggens recording machine. Don't remember the exact bandwith (I'm at work but I think the A-band is lower than the B-band. So a A-band carrier frequency and a low PRF would mean the emitter is a long-range radar, and vice versa. Sorry that the wording in the kneeboard is a little unclear. DCS AJS37 HACKERMAN There will always be bugs. If everything is a priority nothing is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grunf Posted February 7, 2017 Author Share Posted February 7, 2017 Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grunf Posted February 7, 2017 Author Share Posted February 7, 2017 Added some more stuff. :smartass: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diditopgun Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 (edited) You can add the A-50 Mainstay: And in your file you have inverted Freq and PRF. ;) Edited February 7, 2017 by diditopgun 1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Intel I7 8700K / RTX 3080 / 32Go DDR4 PC21300 G.Skill Ripjaws V / MSI Z370 Gaming Pro Carbon / Cooler Master Silent Pro Gold - 1000W / Noctua NH-D14 / Acer XB270HUDbmiprz 27" G-synch 144Hz / SSD Samsung 860EVO 250Go + 1To / Cooler Master HAF X / Warthog+VPC WarBRD / Thrustmaster TPR / Track-IR v5 + Track Clip Pro / Windows 11 64bits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grunf Posted February 7, 2017 Author Share Posted February 7, 2017 You can add the A-50 Mainstay: Thanks! :thumbup: And in your file you have inverted Freq and PRF. ;) Not realy inverted, but miss-labeled :D. The frequency is the actual frequency of the tone you hear from the RWR, higher the number, higher the pitch tone and vice versa. As for the other category, I'll probably label it "Band". BTW, strange how you did't pick the other emission from Moskva. I think the one in you report is a lock, and the search radar is missing. Correct me if I'm wrong. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diditopgun Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Moskva shoot at me yes. What is strange is that my RWR detected all radars (Moskva, A-50 and S-300) very late.... [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Intel I7 8700K / RTX 3080 / 32Go DDR4 PC21300 G.Skill Ripjaws V / MSI Z370 Gaming Pro Carbon / Cooler Master Silent Pro Gold - 1000W / Noctua NH-D14 / Acer XB270HUDbmiprz 27" G-synch 144Hz / SSD Samsung 860EVO 250Go + 1To / Cooler Master HAF X / Warthog+VPC WarBRD / Thrustmaster TPR / Track-IR v5 + Track Clip Pro / Windows 11 64bits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts