rel4y Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 (edited) The SC 250 and SC 500 had the 25/A/B/C fuze type as seen in the diagram below. This is the general purpose type electric land fuze. Starting mid 1943 only type C was used, so in late war scenarios only this type is of importance. Type C differs to type B only in temperature sensitivity, as the latter had increased fuze arm times at below -20°C. The C type is temperature stable up to -50°C. The explanation of the differences can be seen in the second picture which is a development flow chart of the fuzes. There are two relevant factors in fuze settings to arming, dropping and exploding the bomb. First there is the arming delay and second there is the firing delay. The fuze has two settings, Zündstellung I & Zündstellung II which have to be ground adjusted for the Bf 109 or FW 190. You can only set the fuze to either Zündstellung I or Zündstellung II on the ground, there is no changing it in the air. It is set by a small screw, which can be seen in the following photograph. Zündstellung I means that by setting the ZSK 244 to m.V. in either waagerecht or sturz the firing delay is set to 0.08 s. Zündstellung II sets the m.V. firing delay for both waagerecht or sturz to 14 s. For both Zündstellung I & II the o.V setting in waagerecht or sturz has no firing delay. These are the delay timings after which an armed and impacted bomb will detonate. Type 25B and C differ to some extend in fuze arming delay times, but are mostly similiar. The only difference being Zündstellung I waagerecht o.V. & m.V. which can be read with pretty good accuracy from the fourth picture below. As can be seen in the third picture the arming times for Zündstellung I & II are the same. But due to the nature of the wiring only either m.V. or Vz. timings can be used exclusively. Now to the arming delay of the 25C fuze: Zündstellung I waagerecht o.V. 3 -6 s (second number read from the graph of picture four) waagerecht m.V. 5.6 -11.6 s (second number read from the graph of picture four) senkrecht o.V. 1.9 - 3.5 s senkrecht m.V. 1.9 - 3.6 s Zündstellung II waagerecht o.V. 3 -6 s (second number read from the graph of picture four) waagerecht m.V. 0.8 -1.5 s senkrecht o.V. 1.9 - 3.5 s senkrecht m.V. 0.4 - 0.7 s Before the first number the fuze is 0% armed, the second number is the 100% arm time. If it impacts before the first timepoint it will not detonate. In between this time there is a partial arming window, so some bombs may detonate. So in essence Zündstellung I is the "high altitude" fuze setting while Zündstellung II is the "low altitude" fuze setting. The Bf 109 and FW 190 are neither level bombers, so Zündstellung II could be used in the sim as a standard. This allows either o.V. without delay or m.V. for a firing delay of 14 s. Then the Zündstellung II arming delays need to be programmed for each setting as shown above. These are the original descriptions of the fuzes. As a little bonus: I noticed on Burning Skies a SC 250 bomb doesnt kill the ships. Take a look at the following. :music_whistling: Edited January 20, 2017 by rel4y Cougar, CH and Saitek PnP hall sensor kits + shift registers: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=220916 Shapeways store for DIY flight simming equipment and repair: https://www.shapeways.com/shops/rel4y-diy-joystick-flight-simming Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mack Dream Posted December 7, 2021 Share Posted December 7, 2021 (edited) Hopefully there will be a solution to the bomb fuse settings someday in my lifetime. Between January 19, 2017 and today December 7, 2021 is taking long time overdue for a bug & problem like this one. Edited December 7, 2021 by Mack Dream 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simps.NL Posted December 7, 2021 Share Posted December 7, 2021 Yeah, it'd be nice if this got fixed relatively soon. Would give the Axis airplanes some added functionality in low level bombing. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hobel Posted December 16, 2021 Share Posted December 16, 2021 The list is long regarding such bugs, very long. I guess that with the current engine it is not so easy to remove such bugs. Hope must bring there Vulkan Otherwise I can't explain why such bugs are so persistent and still annoy us after years or decades. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flappie Posted December 16, 2021 Share Posted December 16, 2021 To tackle bugs, testers need tracks. I don't see any track in this thread. 1 Don't accept indie game testing requests from friends in Discord. Ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razo+r Posted December 16, 2021 Share Posted December 16, 2021 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Flappie said: To tackle bugs, testers need tracks. I don't see any track in this thread. Also worth mentioning that no fuse settings works anymore since more than 1 year, at least. Edited December 16, 2021 by razo+r Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flappie Posted December 16, 2021 Share Posted December 16, 2021 (edited) Thanks for the enlightenment (I don't fly DCS warbirds - does it show?). I see there's still work on devs' plate. Edited December 16, 2021 by Flappie Don't accept indie game testing requests from friends in Discord. Ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
II.JG1_Vonrd Posted December 17, 2021 Share Posted December 17, 2021 On 12/16/2021 at 5:06 AM, razo+r said: Also worth mentioning that no fuse settings works anymore since more than 1 year, at least. Regarding the above thread: Jul 18NineLine locked this topic NineLine said: It is technically not a bug, but we are updating the load outs for WWII with proper fuse settings. This will give all aircraft, allied and axis some long delay options. The way it was before was incorrect. It shouldn't have been "fixed" until it was right, but here we are. Well, if it's not a bug the current behavior of the bomb delay is certainly inaccurate and problematic. It absolutely needs to be addressed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED Team NineLine Posted December 23, 2021 ED Team Share Posted December 23, 2021 As stated, its being worked on internally. 1 1 Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts