Jump to content

DEVELOPMENT UPDATE #3: Phoenix Rising!


Recommended Posts

Banner.jpg

 

 

 

 

Dear All,

 

 

For the F-14 project, we realized that we'll need to spend considerable time and effort with the development and research for the AIM-54 Phoenix missile.

 

Not only due to this weapons' unique place as a weapon designed specifically for the AWG-9 radar system, its' role as the tip of the spear of the USN air-to-air capability or even it's amazing range and performance-- but also to ensure that any advantages and disadvantages of the missile are accurately reproduced and respected.

 

It's quite likely that the AIM-54 will change the players' experience in the DCS multiplayer environment.

Thus, we consider it of the utmost importance to have a wide breadth of open and readily available research available to the community.

 

We have no horse in this race except for historical accuracy, and with Tom and Márton at our side, we're confident that we'll get as close as anyone ever has.

Please enjoy their initial development report on the AIM-54 below;

 

 

Basic Overview

 

Since the inception of the F-14 project, we have been working closely with Leatherneck to provide our expertise in providing the most accurate simulation for the AIM-54 that can be reasonably developed on a flight simulation game development budget. The iconic nature of the AIM-54 deserves this level of attention, especially due to its long range and advanced guidance systems; systems that were later incorporated into the AIM-120. It's also very important to maintain strict accordance with real life performance parameters, so that historical advantages and drawbacks are accurately simulated and have the appropriate effect on the multiplayer environment.

 

As it stands of writing, we are currently simulating drag effects at different velocities and altitudes to ensure accurate drag curves. This is perhaps the longest part of the process as each simulation takes hours to run.

 

This simulation is based off of a 3D CAD model from which has been created based on reliable source material as well as high resolution imagery. The model has been imported into Fluent where a mesh creation, testing and validation process began and has now been completed.

 

Once all the simulations have been run, we are able to take this data and then use it to create velocity/time diagrams. These will be matched against literature estimates to revalidate the model.

 

Once established, we will then be able to write DCS code which will mirror the in-game missile’s performance to that which has been simulated. The final step is to then assist Leatherneck with their work in guidance and radar algorithms. The missile has the range it does, not just due to its huge motor, but also its advanced lofting profiles. These exist in the game at the moment, but will be significantly expanded, as their simplicity often leading to worse performance than level flight.

 

Research

 

The first step in the process was to data mine as much as possible about the missile. Fortunately, due to its age and public interest, quite a bit of information is available. The most important information for us was the missile’s motor performance and dimensions, the latter being a relatively easy task if taken just from high resolution photographs.

 

As for the motor, there have been a lot of questions raised across the internet about the Mk-47 vs the Mk-60 motor, and which version of the AIM-54 received which- and why?

 

In summary, the first motor produced for the prototype was the Mk. 47, which yields 364lbs of propellant. The Mk-47 was produced from the mid- 1960’s up through and until ‘92.

In parallel, the Mk-60 motor was produced with 459lbs of propellant, obviously a much larger motor. However, due to rising costs, this motors' production was cancelled in 1978.

 

What this basically means is that the AIM-54A had the choice of either motor, and by the time that the AIM-54C was available in the late 70’s/early 80’s, the Mk-60 was no longer in production. The motors were not retired, however, and some were still in service in limited number. As the years progressed, the Mk-60 was removed from service as service life came to an end and the AIM-54C and C+ exclusively used the smaller Mk-47 motor.

 

CAD

 

As mentioned previously, the CAD model for the AIM-54 was created from reference material providing exact dimensions, with more specific details (e.g. angles, radiuses) taken from photographs.

 

We omitted details that would be otherwise masked by the resolution of the numerical mesh (small protrusions)

 

 

Figure 1. CAD Model used for the simulation

CFDModel.jpg

 

 

CFD

 

The simulation of the supersonic regimes was carried out using a density based solver with all compressibility effects and SST turbulence.

 

The mesh was created in a way so that it gives good shock resolution in the necessary velocity regions (M1-M4) and damps possible reflections from the boundaries.

The mesh uses hexahedral cells to reduce computational costs and improve accuracy.

 

The preliminary simulations managed to reproduce all expected shockwave behaviour and interaction phenomena. Currently, we are testing the mesh to make sure it produces the necessary mesh density convergence.

 

After this step is complete, we can begin the accumulation of data based on the simulations.

 

 

Figure 2. Unstructed mesh with refined shock regions

Mesh.jpg

 

 

 

Figure 3. Oblique compression and expansion waves along the missile

sim_01.jpg

 

 

 

Figure 4. Shockwave interaction along the missile, the image shows constant pressure lines

sim_02.jpg

 

 

 

Figure 5. Bow shocks at low supersonic velocity, the image shows the density distribution (lighter = higher density)

sim_03.jpg

 

 

Future Developments

 

Once the simulations are complete and we are happy with their accuracy, we will create a DCS AIM-54 based on this data.

Iterative tests and benchmarks will be run at altitude to ensure that it meets the CFD modelling.

 

Once the missile matches like-for-like, we will begin to look at the guidance and lofting algorithms.

There are a number of sources that already provide clear examples of efficient intercept and guidance laws that include lofting, one such source is directly from the US Navy Academy, for the then new AIM-120A.

 

Beyond literary sources, there are SMEs' willing to share their own accounts and insights into how the weapon is employed, and what we’d expect to see at different launch parameters.

 

There will be a lot of work and co-operation together with Leatherneck to ensure that the missile is expanded past current DCS guidance parameters.

This is the second most challenging part of the AIM-54's development, but I am confident that together with the Leatherneck team, we’ll recreate this iconic weapon to the utmost realism and standards available outside of military contracts.

 

 

 

Many thanks to everyone for reading. The team is hard at work on all aspects of the simulation!

 

Thank you for your patience and support, always,

 

Sincerely,

Leatherneck Simulations

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Nicholas Dackard

 

Founder & Lead Artist

Heatblur Simulations

 

https://www.facebook.com/heatblur/

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 170
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks, Cobra.

 

That's awesome!

Mission: "To intercept and destroy aircraft and airborne missiles in all weather conditions in order to establish and maintain air superiority in a designated area. To deliver air-to-ground ordnance on time in any weather condition. And to provide tactical reconaissance imagery" - F-14 Tomcat Roll Call

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesome, what detail! Thanks for the update LN. :)

i7 7700K | 32GB RAM | GTX 1080Ti | Rift CV1 | TM Warthog | Win 10

 

"There will always be people with a false sense of entitlement.

You can want it, you can ask for it, but you don't automatically deserve it. "

Link to post
Share on other sites

great work team

More news to the front

Wishlist: ED / 3rd Party Campaings

My Rig: Intel I-5 750 2.67Ghz / Packard Bell FMP55 / 16 GB DDR3 RAM / GTX-1080 8 GB RAM / HD 1Tb/2Tb / Warthog / 2 MDF / TFPR

 

DCS: Roadmap (unofficial):https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=116893

DCS: List of Vacant models: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=4076891#post4076891

21Squad DCS: World News: https://www.facebook.com/21Squad-219508958071000/

Silver_Dragon Youtube

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is awesome news, really glad you are putting an extreme amount of detail into some of the smaller things.

 

Keep up the good work!

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Director | Team Coordinator

PC Specs:

 

 

  • Intel I7 8700k 4.7Ghz
  • Gigabyte Aorus Ultra Gaming Z370 Motherboard
  • 16GB Corsair Vengeance DDR4 3000MHz Ram
  • 500GB Samsung Evo 850 SSD

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are working on the AIM-54C I think.

Once the missile matches like-for-like, we will begin to look at the guidance and lofting algorithms.

There are a number of sources that already provide clear examples of efficient intercept and guidance laws that include lofting, one such source is directly from the US Navy Academy, for the then new AIM-120A.

The AIM-54C has the same guidance system as the AIM-120A.

Mission: "To intercept and destroy aircraft and airborne missiles in all weather conditions in order to establish and maintain air superiority in a designated area. To deliver air-to-ground ordnance on time in any weather condition. And to provide tactical reconaissance imagery" - F-14 Tomcat Roll Call

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesome update as always! :D

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | Aorus X570 Master | 64GB G Skill Trident Z Royal | EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 Ultra| Samsung EVO Plus 2 TB M.2 PCIe SSDs | TM Hornet Stick/WinWing Hornet Throttle | VPC T-50 Stick Base | TM TPR Rudder Pedals W/Damper | HP Reverb G2



 

VFA-25 Fist of the Fleet

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great update guys! I love hearing about these small, albeit important, details and steps.

 

 

 

 

So am I understanding it right that you are not constrained by EDs missile code for making the 54 realistic? Or is this taking into account the coming improvements to the missile performance?

ED will have final say on all weapons. Since LNS is going to such lengths for an authentic experience, ED will most likely accept their work.

Win 10 Pro 64Bit | 49" UWHD AOC 5120x1440p | AMD 5900x | 64Gb DDR4 | RX 6800XT

Link to post
Share on other sites

I love this, Great work LN. and Any update, even a small one is appreciated way more than no updates.

 

I know ED wants to do new missile performance as well for AG and AA, hope we soon get a much more immersive missiles overall.

 

@Cobra, While the Aim54 is the jewel in the crown will the Aim-9L/M and sparrow get the same or "updated" treatment?


Edited by sirscorpion
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

ED will have final say on all weapons. Since LNS is going to such lengths for an authentic experience, ED will most likely accept their work.

 

Is that statement confirmed by devs or something? would like a source on what ED has say on or not.

 

Thank you in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

ED has a say on pretty much everything from the 3rd parties.

General 3D modeling thread and reference sites

UK liveries for planes, ships and MODS.

The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance.

"Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.."

Updates to my stuff are now going here

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...