Jump to content

2016 Hardware Benchmark - DCS World 1.5.x


Recommended Posts

FYI new rig Intel 8600K startling numbers, 8600k @4.5Ghz CPU load 36% GTX 1080 load 99%

 

DCS 1.5.7 A10-C flying Caucasus

FPS 60-85 FPS (5780x2160 - 4 screens)

graphics options maxed

 

ASRock Extreme4 Z370 with 4.5Ghz ‘Optimized’ OC setting & CPU “voltage offset”

 

16GB DDR4 - 2x8GB 3200 Corsair Vengeance LPX

Asus GTX 1080

Nvidia drivers 390.65

Nvidia Profile Inspector Antialiasing for DCS: SuperVCAA_64X_4x12

 

8600k @4.5Ghz

8600k CPU max load 36%

8600k CPU max Volt 0.62V (<- how about that)

8600k CPU max Temp 47°C (<- how about that)

 

Asus GTX 1080 max load 99% sustained

Asus GTX 1080 max Temp 65°C

 

4x screens 1080p 5780x2160 (T-setup)

 

Thrustmaster WH, Logitech 940, PSU 750W Cooler Master

 

How cool is that (pun intended)

  • Like 1

| VR goggles | Autopilot panel | Headtracker | TM HOTAS | G920 HOTAS | MS FFB 2 | Throttle Quadrants | 8600K | GTX 1080 | 64GB RAM| Win 10 x64 | Voicerecognition | 50" UHD TV monitor | 40" 1080p TV monitor | 2x 24" 1080p side monitors | 24" 1080p touchscreen |

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 231
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I just strated some tests with new DCS versions but looking at todays real botleneck - CPU frame time here https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=3372283#post3372283

Pimax 5k+  |  i9 9900ks @5,4Ghz  |  RTX 3080 TI  |  32GB DDR4 @3200GHz  |  Corsair MP510 NVMe /Samsung 970 NVMe   |  ASUS ROG Swift UQHD PG348Q G-sync  |  SEASONIC 850W  |  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
Replacing a 6 year old intel CPU with an AMD Ryzen it yielded 15% more performance, but when the GFX was changed it got me a whopping 68% difference.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=163584&stc=1&d=1496498657

 

Note: the 1080Ti test was conducted with a DCS 2.1.0.6002 version (had sent off the older GFX before the switch), and that might explain why downtown was higher than Nellis (for reasons that escape me). SAince this version is more demanding I can only conclude that >70% performance difference would be a more realistic value.

 

 

great test

Intel® Core™ i5-2500k CPU@4.20GHz 64 bit operation System Windows 10+ Pro NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 - Memory: 16.0 GB - 500gb ssd samsung - Samsung 27"SyncMaster TA550 monitors [SIZE=1][B]- [/B][/SIZE][FONT=Arial][SIZE=2]TM Hotas Warthog[/SIZE][/FONT] Trackir4 - TM Rudder Pedals.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tests with 3900X this weekend. :)

[sigpic]http://forums.eagle.ru/signaturepics/sigpic4448_29.gif[/sigpic]

My PC specs below:

Case: Corsair 400C

PSU: SEASONIC SS-760XP2 760W Platinum

CPU: AMD RYZEN 3900X (12C/24T)

RAM: 32 GB 4266Mhz (two 2x8 kits) of trident Z RGB @3600Mhz CL 14 CR=1T

MOBO: ASUS CROSSHAIR HERO VI AM4

GFX: GTX 1080Ti MSI Gaming X

Cooler: NXZT Kraken X62 280mm AIO

Storage: Samsung 960 EVO 1TB M.2+6GB WD 6Gb red

HOTAS: Thrustmaster Warthog + CH pro pedals

Monitor: Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD Freesync HDR400 1440P

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Done.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=216103&stc=1&d=1566665433

[sigpic]http://forums.eagle.ru/signaturepics/sigpic4448_29.gif[/sigpic]

My PC specs below:

Case: Corsair 400C

PSU: SEASONIC SS-760XP2 760W Platinum

CPU: AMD RYZEN 3900X (12C/24T)

RAM: 32 GB 4266Mhz (two 2x8 kits) of trident Z RGB @3600Mhz CL 14 CR=1T

MOBO: ASUS CROSSHAIR HERO VI AM4

GFX: GTX 1080Ti MSI Gaming X

Cooler: NXZT Kraken X62 280mm AIO

Storage: Samsung 960 EVO 1TB M.2+6GB WD 6Gb red

HOTAS: Thrustmaster Warthog + CH pro pedals

Monitor: Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD Freesync HDR400 1440P

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:thumbup:

 

Looks GREAT :pilotfly:

Asus Z370-E - 8700K@5G_delidded - 32GB - 1080GTX-Ti EK-waterblock - 1x 960Evo 250GB - 3x Samsung 850/860Pro 256GB Raid-0 - 1x Samsung 870 Evo 1TB - 2x Seagate 2TB - 32GB PageFile - Heatkiller IV - MoRa3-360LT@4x180mm fans - Corsair AXi-1200 - TiR5-Pro - Warthog Hotas - Saitek Combat Pedals - Asus PG278Q 27" QHD Gsync 144Hz - Win10Pro64 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Awesome chart. My new system is similar to yours - save for the gfx card I think - and am curious what terrain map those numbers were acquired on? For me I easily get my highest frames in Nevada and a bit less on the Persian gulf map. I havent really done anything on the caucuses or ww2 map since hitting the power button a few days ago.

 

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Ryzen9 3900X, Gigabyte Aorus X570 Elite, 32Gb Gskill Trident DDR4 3600 CL16, Gigabyte Aorus 1Tb Nvme Gen4, Evo860 1Tb 2.5 SSD, EVGA FTW RTX2080 Super, Corsair h115i Platinum AIO, NZXT H710i case, Seasonic Focus 850W psu, Gigabyte Aorus AD27QHD Gsync 1ms IPS 2k monitor 144Mhz, Track ir4, TMW Hotas, Saitek combat pedals, RiftS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a trackfile made by MadMike with a link in post #217. Unfortunately the link does not work anymore.

 

It may well not be comparable anymore with all those updates across the spectrum, NV driver(s), Win10 updates/Builds, DCS's progress.

 

What matters is: Do you have FUN flying it ?

 

Likely this was Caucasus, the FREE map, so everyone can play it.

 

** looking at the screenshot again, might have been NTTR.

 

Testfiles should have Caucasus and a Su-25T, so it runs without any need for purchased modules. PG and F-14 would be useless for 50% of all players, estimated.


Edited by BitMaster

Asus Z370-E - 8700K@5G_delidded - 32GB - 1080GTX-Ti EK-waterblock - 1x 960Evo 250GB - 3x Samsung 850/860Pro 256GB Raid-0 - 1x Samsung 870 Evo 1TB - 2x Seagate 2TB - 32GB PageFile - Heatkiller IV - MoRa3-360LT@4x180mm fans - Corsair AXi-1200 - TiR5-Pro - Warthog Hotas - Saitek Combat Pedals - Asus PG278Q 27" QHD Gsync 144Hz - Win10Pro64 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...