Developer jailed in US for smuggling F-16 manuals - Page 5 - ED Forums
 


Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-13-2019, 09:54 PM   #41
Sirius
Member
 
Sirius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: North Carolina, USA
Posts: 760
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Esper View Post
While I understand he might have crossed a line, going full bananas like that on the guy is just overkill.

As for the F22/35 thing, who wouldn't want a peek? I know I wouldn't report finding the manuals and keep them if I found one on the ground.
No, it's not overkilling, it's how the law works in the U.S. The F-16C documentation was already publicized on the internet which does not make sense as to why the developer was trying to already get manuals on the aircraft, and the F-22/F-35 are both 5th generation aircraft that are classified. Imagine a foreigner that is an adversary of yours not in the best of political terms trying to obtain those manuals. Makes sense to me as to why it would be taken not-so-lightly.
__________________


"Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree,
then it will live its whole life believing it is stupid." - Albert Einstein


Spoiler:

PC Specs: AMD Ryzen 5, AMD Radeon RX 580, 24 GB DDR4, 128 SSD, 2 TB HDD
Modules: All but Mi-8, MiG-15, MiG-21, and Normandy.
Discord: Sirius#0002
Sirius is offline  
Old 05-13-2019, 09:57 PM   #42
probad
Senior Member
 
probad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 2,272
Default

Quote:
The manuals contained "concise and clear instructions" for operating and maintaining F-16s, the affidavit said.
i found this funny as hell though
like who could have guessed

always good to see our dear journos working their blessed butts off searching for those scary sound bites
__________________
hahaha hey look at me i surely know more about aviation and coding than actual industry professionals hired for their competency because i have read jalopnik and wikipedia i bet theyve never even heard of google LOL

Last edited by probad; 05-13-2019 at 10:03 PM.
probad is offline  
Old 05-13-2019, 10:01 PM   #43
amalahama
Senior Member
 
amalahama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ein helles, bitte
Posts: 1,588
Default

https://www.dropbox.com/s/oya6o79zz0...1qFbmFmdEPMVK8


Regards
__________________

amalahama is offline  
Old 05-13-2019, 10:13 PM   #44
Darkwolf
Senior Member
 
Darkwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,515
Default

Quote:
did the post heading get changed to say " Former"
Question is - was he still part of ED back then?


Quote:
He was charged in a sealed indictment June 15, 2016,
__________________

PC simulator news site.
Darkwolf is offline  
Old 05-13-2019, 10:13 PM   #45
=BJM=
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,251
Default

I feel sorry for him and want to believe he had no evil intentions, just curiosity getting the best of him. However, it should not be taken lightly. We have to remember that we are simulating real weapons of war that can be used to do bad things and get people killed.

I have always been curious as to how ED can simulate aircraft and weapons still in use and where the fine line is that they can't cross. Rule 1.16 states no referencing of documents later than 1980. It makes we wonder why ED is even simulating 4th gen aircraft if we can't even really discuss or learn about what we are simulating without fear of doing something illegal or endangering someone's life. It would have been best if DCS just simulated pre-1980 aircraft.

This whole mess in addition to rule 1.16 kind of makes me uncomfortable about DCS right now.

I look forward to ED's response about all of this.
=BJM= is offline  
Old 05-13-2019, 10:22 PM   #46
RaceFuel85
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 638
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkwolf View Post
Question is - was he still part of ED back then?
Yes

He was on the ED team as recently as last year
RaceFuel85 is offline  
Old 05-13-2019, 10:42 PM   #47
chaser
Member
 
chaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 547
Default

so its ITAR wow that's serious as the owner and publisher of military magazines, who was brought into dcs world for a review point of view this is very serious indeed
__________________
chaser is offline  
Old 05-13-2019, 10:46 PM   #48
Mower
Veteran
 
Mower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,077
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by (504)Blade View Post
sucks to be in the EU
Agreed.
__________________
<HOOK TO STEEL!>
Current owner of DCS F/A-18C, F-16C, F-14B, A-10C, F5E, FC3, BS2, CA.
Mower is offline  
Old 05-13-2019, 11:01 PM   #49
beppe_goodoldrebel
Senior Member
 
beppe_goodoldrebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,157
Default

I'm pretty sure they are legally covered for using F18 and F16 data.
I don't think ED moves buying manuals from eBay, much more like they move to have agreements with companies/govts.

Considering the Boeing partnership I don't think Boeing itself would like to be being involved in ITAR things.
beppe_goodoldrebel is offline  
Old 05-13-2019, 11:08 PM   #50
Falcon_S
Senior Member
 
Falcon_S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Република Српска
Posts: 1,327
Default

It's the world we live in. It's sad.

In title: "Russian..."

Spectacle.
__________________


If you are a dedicated pilot, a team player ... join us !!!

14th VFS Samurais Discord: https://discord.gg/uc9c7Vz
Teamspeak: 14vfs.teamspeak3.com


Немој ништа силом, узми већи чекић!

MSI Tomahawk MAX | Ryzen 7 3700x | 32GB DDR4 3200MHz | RX 5700 XT OC Red Dragon 8GB
Falcon_S is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:10 AM. vBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys. Powered by vBulletin®.
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.