Christmas news 2017 - ED Forums


Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-11-2017, 12:40 AM   #1
3rd Party Developer
borchi_2b's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,063
Default Christmas news 2017

Valued Customers and Polychop Simulations fans,
Christmas is about to happen, and we decided to talk a bit about the past year 2017 and the future year 2018.

First of all, we want to thank all our customers for the support, which is important for any company to exist.
We’re still here and making great products for simulators so you guys must like something we’re doing and that
makes our team very happy; thank you from the Polychop family to yours.

Briefly, I’ll dive into some issues Polychop faced in 2017. As all of you have witnessed, we have gone through
internal issues, that already developed in 2016. As many companies face the same issues in the beginning,
there are possible routes to take and not every member agrees on the same course. As was the case for us.
We wanted to keep Polychop as a cohesive team, that way we could devote every ounce of our energy into building
great products rather than internal strife.
Therefore, with best wishes, we wished our former CEO Oliver Michel goodbye and agreed on giving him the BO105 project,
which is now run under Miltech-5. We still wished to release more products because we are confident,
as a team that we can provide some of the best simulation software available so in 2016,
we started a new project in secret to avoid the pressure of rushing out an un-prepared product and could
focus energy on improving the Gazelle. Although many things that were stated during the past 9 month are not correct
and painted a wrong picture I never felt the need to make a direct statement to any interviews, trailers,
or anything that showed codework of Polychop Simulation nor had Patrick any intent to brag about it.
This is still the case and so I can only state that for the remaining Polychop Simulation Staff,
we are glad this split was finalized before the end of 2018 and that we do not have to deal with the
BO105 and the development anymore. Sadly, due to contractual disagreements, we were not able to accept
the conditions discussed between Polychop and Miltech-5 to continue work on the BO-105 jointly.

We utilized most of 2017 to really hone the Gazelle and our other projects. The Gazelle itself really
saw a lot of attention and re-coding to help mature several key improvements. Flight model, textures,
and much proprietary framework was poured over until we reached a point where not only the simulation pilots felt happy,
but also a beta team comprised of actual helicopter pilots said they were satisfied with the product.
There are a few details that are still being evaluated and we are still collecting data in these areas. Some is easier,
some is not. For example, we did look into the cyclic behavior again, but currently there is no data available regarding
how many degrees the cyclic is pushed forward proportionall to forward airspeed. Many factors collate into this problem
including control rigging and wind. Given how our testing staff has very limited time to devote to
testing (dare I say, actual Gazelle pilots?) we determined that some of these issues were not worth the
effort put into fixing them. Not because it wasn’t important to us, but because it wasn’t cost effective or
prudent to do so. We also planned to have a new device implemented into the SA342M Viviane Gazelle.
The new device was a periscope that is available in the real machine, but do to framerate break-downs using the
periscope and the tv, which would both be active at the same time, we decided to not implement this feature.
Framerate management is as important to a developer as smooth textures or appealing visuals.
If we can’t implement some feature due to framerates, it hinders the experience for the end-user.
I can only provide an example: On an average system, the simulation see’s 30 FPS with an activated TV.
With the TV and periscope activated, the best we could benchmark was 15 FPS. Because of this,
we couldn’t agree to implementing it. We didn’t want to throw a new feature in that was not usable and
improve the customers experience. A picture of the periscope was shown on our facebook page earlier.
To clear the air about it: no, it is not a periscope of a EC665 Tigre HAD.
Sadly, we finally also decided to scratch the sniper version for now and probably for good,
because in DCS there is no real use of a sniper and would only be able to hit soft targets at a max range of 300m.
Instead, we decided to change the sniper version to a minigun version that, if it works out well,
would be accessible as multicrew. This is what we plan as an update for the Gazelle in 2018,
but we have no timeframe yet when this will exactly happen, because it also depends on the core coding.
This and multi-crew both require more information from Eagle Dynamics before we can really improve those features.
We will continue to work closely with Eagle Dynamics to help make the Gazelle a smooth and effective product.

Looking to the future and into 2018, as already mentioned, we gave away the BO105 project so we can’t guarantee a release for 2018.
The split ate a lot of resources and time unfortunately, but for 2018 we already have a strong game plan.
replace all of that with this: We are a small team, but many of our core testers are actual pilots,
some with military obligations and can only provide energy and time as available.
Thankfully, our testers and core employees who have some insight into the exciting projects in the future
and want to see these projects to completion as badly as many of you.
We want to extend a grateful and humbled thanks to all the talented people who applied for the programmer’s slots.
Our first actions for 2018 will be interviews with the individuals that applied.
We really want to grow our programmer department to produce faster code to devote more time and resources for the detail tuning.
About the programming, I had to learn that the fine-tuning is about 30% of the coding, which Patrick already knew.
We’re working with Eagle Dynamics and, in 2018, an aircraft manufacture to fine-tune our code process and produce a product
with a higher degree of fidelity.
The team at Polychop loves anything that flies and particularly, anything that spins.
Therefore, we want to branch into the interesting realm of civilian aviation and hopefully see some of our loyal customers
on other platforms. We just haven’t decided which yet and want to make a smart choice. Our team is so small that
any time we devote into a project is going to be about quality, not quantity and the choice of a non-military simulator
must provide the company with the resources to continue improving with technology.
About fixed wing products, we cannot say much because our team is still too small to work on fixed wing in addition.
This might change through the course of 2018.
And finally, we hope to open a Polychop discord channel so you, our loyal customers,
are able to interface and receive direct input with the developers, testers and people who desire you’re raw input.
So maybe now and then we will have a friendly chat.

At the end I also want to send out a personal note of acknowledgment to the people that supported
the current development in the background.
Without these friends, this would have not gotten as far as it already has and the community of this bird is amazing.
My girlfriend might have to buy me a Stetson one day when we visit friends overseas.
That said, I put up a rendering of the 3d model in a state that it has been earlier this year without textures.
Currently, we are not sure yet into which simulation this 3d model will be implemented in the end, but it will happen.

So, thank you for reading and your continued support.
In the end, our goal here at Polychop is to provide you with the most realistic and immersive product that we can.
We wish all of you and your families a delightful Christmas season 2017 and a good jump into the year 2018!

Your Polychop Simulation Team
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	5.jpg
Views:	4573
Size:	429.2 KB
ID:	173972  
borchi_2b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2017, 12:56 AM   #2
Senior Member
Revelation's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Wilson, NC
Posts: 2,152

Well I hope you bring the OH-58D to DCS as that is the chopper I am most interested in.
Win 10 Pro 64Bit | 27" Asus ROG 1440p | i7-6700k @4.54GHz | ASROCK Extreme7+ | 32Gb @3GHz DDR4 | 512Gb SM951 M.2 SSD | GTX 1080Ti | H100i AIO CPU Cooler
Revelation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2017, 01:02 AM   #3
javelina1's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: WAFB, Arizona
Posts: 3,510

Thanks buddy. Appreciate the update. Best wishes to you and your team, and hoping for modeling success! :-)

Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra, i7-9700k (4.9ghz all cores), NH-D15 cooler, 64 GB CL-14 3200mhz RAM, GTX1080SC, Soundblaster Z, Yamaha 5.1 A/V, 1x 512GB Samsung NVMe, 1x 1TB Samsung NVMe, Win 10 Pro, TM Warthog, Virpil WarBRD, MFG Crosswinds, 43" Samsung 4K TV, 21.5 Acer VT touchscreen, TrackIR, JetSeat KW-908, Rift "S", Wheel Stand Pro Super Warthog, Phanteks Enthoo Pro Full Tower Case, Seasonic Prime 750W Titanium PW Supply, PointCTRL
javelina1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2017, 01:28 AM   #4
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 365

Yes, please bring the Kiowa to DCS.
cordite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2017, 01:39 AM   #5
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 675

Must have in DCS as an airborne forward observer
Baz000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2017, 04:11 AM   #6
Saltat_cum_mortem's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 148

It's not the helicopter that I voted for in the poll, but I'm glad to see it and hope to see it in DCS.

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
Saltat_cum_mortem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2017, 05:13 AM   #7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,778

at some point the Kiowa will need a buddy.. (cough cough APACHE!!!!!!)
find me on steam! username: Hannibal_Su25T
hannibal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2017, 05:21 AM   #8
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 207

The Kiowa would be a nice addition to have it in DCS, either way love the Gazelle and thanks for the great module. Some more campaigns now we have the smaller carriers etc would be great for the Gazelle. Similar to the Huey Argo etc... I'm sure that would be loved by the community.

R1Lawsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2017, 05:33 AM   #9
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Fréjus, France
Posts: 49

Very very nice OH-58 model.

Looking forward to what you'll announce in the future.
Absha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2017, 08:02 AM   #10
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 14,544

Thanks for the update!
Looking forward to the things to come

The Kiowa modell looks awesome. I especially like the M4s on the dashboard after having seen so many Kiowa videos with pilots shooting them from the cockpit seat in flight
Intel i7-4790K @ 4x4GHz + 16 GB DDR3 + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit

DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!

QuiGon is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:31 AM. vBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys. Powered by vBulletin®.
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.