The Battle of the Stretch Goal - Page 19 - ED Forums
 


Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-30-2013, 04:22 PM   #181
luthier1
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 118
Default

Thank you everyone for your opinions.

Let's move across to the poll:

http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=114846
luthier1 is offline  
Old 09-30-2013, 04:35 PM   #182
Bucic
Veteran
 
Bucic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Poland
Posts: 5,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sylkhan View Post
I mean 3 aircrafts at DCS level is a lot of work, Giving them for free was ..strange, very strange.
He had to think twice.
Reading all these changes make me wonder if this guy really knows his stuff. He seems to be in the darkness
I was asking about your notion on Su-25, not this.
Bucic is offline  
Old 09-30-2013, 05:13 PM   #183
Kusch
Senior Member
 
Kusch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Poland
Posts: 1,683
Default

It just can not go out of here because no one will believe that you can do three planes (or worse five airplanes!) At the level of advancement of DCS P-51D for $ 40. It is better to cancel the KS, later make a new with one free of the plane and options for adding new modules, with one plane.
__________________
Give me "flying telephone pole" (SA-2)!
Kusch is offline  
Old 09-30-2013, 06:04 PM   #184
LosT_SouL_VL
Junior Member
 
LosT_SouL_VL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Flanders
Posts: 82
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by luthier1 View Post
5. Any other reason you think people are not backing this project? What can we do?

I'm especially interested in hearing your opinion if you have not yet backed this project.

Some people (like myself) won't back you because of the CLOD disaster... You can be in denial or USSR style censor things because you're not comfortable with them; but that won't change that fact. Frankly I know a lot of people that won't back you and/or Oleg because of the "CLOD reason"...I think you both underestimated the resentment that more than a few people have towards CLOD and everyone who is "tainted" by CLOD...
LosT_SouL_VL is offline  
Old 09-30-2013, 06:22 PM   #185
hakjar
Member
 
hakjar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sweden
Posts: 363
Default

Please don't come dragging that resentment in here. You are allowed your opinion but remember that sometimes projects fail for no apparent reason.

"No battle plan survives the first contact with the enemy" and we can't from our place as customer know or identify all the variables that led to CoD's lesser release.

However the backbone of the sim was apparently sound as Team Fusion proves with their work.
hakjar is offline  
Old 09-30-2013, 06:27 PM   #186
Bucic
Veteran
 
Bucic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Poland
Posts: 5,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kusch View Post
It just can not go out of here because no one will believe that you can do three planes (or worse five airplanes!) At the level of advancement of DCS P-51D for $ 40. It is better to cancel the KS, later make a new with one free of the plane and options for adding new modules, with one plane.
Cancelling a successfully funded project? Nope.
Too much given for free? It's being corrected as we speak.
Too much planes for $40? Well, that price/aircraft set is only for backers.
Bucic is offline  
Old 09-30-2013, 06:39 PM   #187
Bucic
Veteran
 
Bucic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Poland
Posts: 5,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hakjar View Post
Please don't come dragging that resentment in here. You are allowed your opinion but remember that sometimes projects fail for no apparent reason.

"No battle plan survives the first contact with the enemy" and we can't from our place as customer know or identify all the variables that led to CoD's lesser release.

However the backbone of the sim was apparently sound as Team Fusion proves with their work.
This was a legitimate concern and going completely silent over it was not a wise thing to do. There's plenty of ways one could toss some bits of info without being exposed to legal action. 'Lessons learned' I proposed could be one of such approaches.

I allowed myself giving some credit of trust to RRG. Do I know what happened to CoD? No. In the light of no info on the subject one may choose to go with the trust and the other - no to trust. I don't see any 'attitude' in it.

My advocacy pro the project would certainly have been more effective with such info up my sleeve.
Bucic is offline  
Old 09-30-2013, 06:43 PM   #188
NineLine
Community Manager
 
NineLine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 25,473
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bucic View Post
This was a legitimate concern and going completely silent over it was not a wise thing to do. There's plenty of ways one could toss some bits of info without being exposed to legal action. 'Lessons learned' I proposed could be one of such approaches.

I allowed myself giving some credit of trust to RRG. Do I know what happened to CoD? No. In the light of no info on the subject one may choose to go with the trust and the other - no to trust. I don't see any 'attitude' in it.

My advocacy pro the project would certainly have been more effective with such info up my sleeve.
If you search, Luthier touched on this issue in these forums, although briefly, lets not get on the slippery slope of discussing it, each individual has the right to use whatever they feel is a valid concern in their decision, this isnt a place for discussion any of those reasons, its now been brought up, no need to dissect it further....

By the way, I am locking this as Luthier has started a new thread.
__________________
Nick Grey - "I have had the privilege of flying most marks of Spit, the I, V, IX, XIV, XIX and enjoyed working with Eagle to make this simulation of the IX the 'mutt's nuts'."
Artist formerly known as SiThSpAwN
Forum RulesForum Rules Guidelines
ED Facebook PageED YouTube PageWags YouTubeMy YouTube • My Discord - NineLine #0440
**How to Report a Bug**
NineLine is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:23 PM. vBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys. Powered by vBulletin®.
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.