A comprehensive bug report on Polychop’s Gazelle - Page 3 - ED Forums
 


Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-24-2019, 02:15 AM   #21
Oceandar
Senior Member
 
Oceandar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Probably would make you smirking
Posts: 1,174
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xtacy View Post
Care to address the mistral missile? It looks like they provided halfway decent numbers and visual references.

Same with RWR detecting various radars. I'd like to see improvements in both of these aspects.
Have you browsed the other thread about this. Not even Tharos could change their mind about the missile. I'd vote to ban Gazelle Mistral in MP untill this matter resolved.
Oh yes, I have the module and its the last time I'd buy anything from Polychop again to be honest.
__________________
Mastering others is strength. Mastering yourself is true power. - Lao Tze
Oceandar is offline  
Old 09-24-2019, 02:17 AM   #22
Xtacy
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 47
Default

yes i've read threads. i'm trying to keep this constructive and hopefully move forward with positive changes
Xtacy is offline  
Old 09-24-2019, 06:42 AM   #23
Damcopter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 45
Default

I performed a test flight one year ago with Borchi_2b "Sven", as I am a military heli pilot in armée de l'air.
I flew the real Gazelle at the beginning of my career and now I am on the As555 Fennec with 3000h+.

Sven is a very nice and comprehensive guy.
I still wonder why the Polychop French guy (Patrick?) didn't speak to me even once. It could have been easier for me to explain my complaint about the FM.

I left Polychop Discord after weeks because there was no more answer.
I met some Gazelle pilote to try to help Polychop because we are really looking forward to take pleasure with the Gazelle but it is impossible with the current FM as it is so weird and the cyclic is not coded like a helo.

Armée de l'air is very very very interested in DCS. It is a great software for us because it allows to perform COMAOs connected together from our respective air base.

For the helos, we will use DCS for the formation of our future leaders, mission commander, for the CAS and CCA qualifications and so on .. So maaaany on. Unfortunately we can't use the Gazelle for that. So we will buy a lot of licence of the UH1 and the Mi8
Damcopter is offline  
Old 09-24-2019, 07:00 AM   #24
Kazansky222
Member
 
Kazansky222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NineLine View Post
Not to bud my nose in to this, but I am interested in the Mistral, the fact that ED has one and the Gazelle has one, I thought all missiles/weapons deferred to the core game, so I wonder if this is just something that needs to be adjusted now that ED added it.
Interesting, does this mean the ED Phoenix should be used as opposed to the HB Phoenix?
__________________

64th "Scorpions" Aggressor Squadron
Discord: 64th Aggressor Squadron
TS: 195.201.110.22
Kazansky222 is offline  
Old 09-24-2019, 08:00 AM   #25
Grimes
ED Testers Team
 
Grimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Black Mesa
Posts: 8,052
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kazansky222 View Post
Interesting, does this mean the ED Phoenix should be used as opposed to the HB Phoenix?
Not necessarily. The M2000 at first used EDs 530D and Magic for maybe a few months to a year, but have been using their own ever since.
__________________
You can only tie the world record for lowest flight.
Current Projects: Scripting Wiki, Something...
Useful Links: Mission Scripting Tools MIST-(GitHub) MIST-(Thread), SLMOD for DCS 1.5/2.0, IADScript, Mission Editing Wiki!, Mission Building Forum
Grimes is offline  
Old 09-24-2019, 09:01 AM   #26
Frostie
Veteran
 
Frostie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 3,530
Default

Great idea and some valid concerns in there but the uses of the word meme and unnecessary attempts of humiliation on a dev trying to be casually informative stinks it up for me. This could have been done in a much more mature manner imo.
Frostie is offline  
Old 09-24-2019, 09:07 AM   #27
Alec Delorean
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 317
Default

@Evontroy


Thanks for posting. I own this module from day one and never touched it since, only to check if they achieved to finally fix it (never happened in years). I wonder how this could pass QA of ED. It should have never been allowed to leave early access in this state. In my opinion, it's an insult for helicopter simmers and the other DCS helicopter modules.
Alec Delorean is offline  
Old 09-24-2019, 09:11 AM   #28
Alec Delorean
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 317
Default

Yes, but look how the devs reacted about those issues over the years. Mature? No.
Alec Delorean is offline  
Old 09-24-2019, 09:50 AM   #29
Yeti42
Member
 
Yeti42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Germany
Posts: 179
Default

There are generally two types of development teams:
1. The team responds to user feedback and where applicable incorporates the feedback into the product when the feedback is accurate and relevant
2. The team regards any criticism (feedback) as a personal affront to their professional abilities and doubles down in order to justify product inadequacies and bugs

I fear Polychop is type two, VEAO was the same with the Hawk, some of the same arguments were used when the community criticised the flight model "we had real pilots" etc. etc. and we all know how the Hawk ended up. Although it could be argued the document provided by Evontroy goes a bit far, I would commend them for the amount of time they spent quantifying their arguments and concerns. I'm not a fan of singling out individuals for criticism in any organization as this can easily turn into a witch hunt and rarely ends in anything constructive. That the Gazelle module is not at the level of the other helo's in DCS should be obvious to anyone who is trying to look at this impartially. I hope Polychop can admit the product's shortcomings and do something about them, that would be the sign of a company who cares about quality, accuracy and its customers.
__________________
Windows 10 64 bit | Intel i5-9600k OC 5 Ghz | RTX 2080 |VENGEANCE® LPX 32GB DDR 4 OC 3200

Hotas Warthog | Logitech G Flight Rudder Pedals | Track IR 4
Yeti42 is offline  
Old 09-24-2019, 11:55 AM   #30
YorZor
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 204
Default

-edit-
Im not getting caught in this discussion again. Please ignore.

Last edited by YorZor; 09-24-2019 at 12:17 PM. Reason: Polychop will bitch about how we dare to communicate this anyway, what is the point.
YorZor is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:03 PM. vBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys. Powered by vBulletin®.
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.