Crumpp Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 It should be obvious that these NACA reports have intrinsic historical value, regardless of whatever value ED's developer's may find in them (no doubt, as Yo Yo has indicated, they have more than enough relevant, current information to replicate propeller & slipstream effects), and that other forum members might find them interesting, if not useful. I'll continue to post such documents and let the forum decide. :smilewink: No issue at all if it for "intrinsic historical value"! :smilewink: Answers to most important questions ATC can ask that every pilot should memorize: 1. No, I do not have a pen. 2. Indicating 250 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Friedrich-4B Posted February 23, 2015 Share Posted February 23, 2015 No issue at all if it for "intrinsic historical value"! :smilewink: AFAIK, Crumpp has absolutely no say in what types of documents other forum members can post. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]************************************* Fortunately, Mk IX is slightly stable, anyway, the required stick travel is not high... but nothing extraordinary. Very pleasant to fly, very controllable, predictable and steady. We never refuse to correct something that was found outside ED if it is really proven...But we never will follow some "experts" who think that only they are the greatest aerodynamic guru with a secret knowledge. :smartass: WWII AIRCRAFT PERFORMANCE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED Team NineLine Posted February 23, 2015 ED Team Share Posted February 23, 2015 And here we are again guys, the inability of you all, and I stress ALL of you to have a reasonable discussion without making it about the other guy... another discussion... in the toilet... Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts