sinelnic Posted June 10, 2012 Share Posted June 10, 2012 I don't really care about branding, just about having the Pros in ED building truly realistic simulatios to the best of their efforts to the best of our enjoyment. An honest and special relationship, you know, we're not kids anymore. Westinghouse W-600 refrigerator - Corona six-pack - Marlboro reds - Patience by Girlfriend "Engineering is the art of modelling materials we do not wholly understand, into shapes we cannot precisely analyse so as to withstand forces we cannot properly assess, in such a way that the public has no reason to suspect the extent of our ignorance." (Dr. A. R. Dykes - British Institution of Structural Engineers, 1976) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
element1108 Posted June 10, 2012 Share Posted June 10, 2012 The guys running the show over here seem to have a grand master plan that seems to be working. Just because Wags mentions that there is a possibility not ALL planes will have A-10C level accuracy, many will (and many may not). I'm pulling this out of my butt here, but lets say 1 in ever 4 airframes that gets released is an A10C equal in terms of accuracy. But if we want a Longbow, or an F-15E or even Superbug, then attaining that level of classified information may be impossible. I like the choice, of course highest fidelity is ideal, but I can see and be entertained by varying levels of fidelity. Ultimately it will be within multiplayer parameters to govern what airframes are mixed with what. Of course I will be a bit more cautious buying from third party developers vs ED directly (wait for reviews, youtube gameplay references etc). This is most definitely not a bad thing, more choices is never bad thing in a sandbox. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WRAITH Posted June 10, 2012 Share Posted June 10, 2012 (edited) The guys running the show over here seem to have a grand master plan that seems to be working. Just because Wags mentions that there is a possibility not ALL planes will have A-10C level accuracy, many will (and many may not). I'm pulling this out of my butt here, but lets say 1 in ever 4 airframes that gets released is an A10C equal in terms of accuracy. But if we want a Longbow, or an F-15E or even Superbug, then attaining that level of classified information may be impossible. I like the choice, of course highest fidelity is ideal, but I can see and be entertained by varying levels of fidelity. Ultimately it will be within multiplayer parameters to govern what airframes are mixed with what. Of course I will be a bit more cautious buying from third party developers vs ED directly (wait for reviews, youtube gameplay references etc). This is most definitely not a bad thing, more choices is never bad thing in a sandbox. Hi, I hear you, your reputation proceeds you :thumbup: Still hoping and nudging along;) Edited June 11, 2012 by WRAITH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yellonet Posted June 10, 2012 Share Posted June 10, 2012 I was always under the (perhaps false) impression that the DCS series would be completely separate from older and or less complex aircraft models and that DCS: BS and DCS: A-10C was just the first two in a long series of modules with the same level of complexity and realism. There is something to be said for a sim where everything conforms to the same standard. As it stands now will we ever be able to tell whether two aircraft are made to the same standards? I can't see how. Can we even trust ED to create their modules to the same standard or will the next module be a fighter with arcade flightmodel and avionics to attract casual gamers? For me the move to start incorporating "lesser" aircraft into the series was quite a surprise and sadly something I see as a devaluation of the DCS product and name. :noexpression: i7-2600k@4GHz, 8GB, R9 280X 3GB, SSD, HOTAS WH, Pro Flight Combat Pedals, TIR5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED Team Wags Posted June 11, 2012 ED Team Share Posted June 11, 2012 http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=89885 Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/user/wagmatt Twitch: wagmatt System: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=3729544#post3729544 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joey45 Posted June 11, 2012 Share Posted June 11, 2012 Thank you Mr Wags Sir.. The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance. "Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.." https://ko-fi.com/joey45 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panzertard Posted June 11, 2012 Share Posted June 11, 2012 http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=89885 Thank you very much, Wags. This is quite a bit of clarification. The mind is like a parachute. It only works when it's open | The important thing is not to stop questioning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nate--IRL-- Posted June 11, 2012 Share Posted June 11, 2012 Yep - I'm looking forward to the Train Module for DCS. Nate Ka-50 AutoPilot/stabilisation system description and operation by IvanK- Essential Reading Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted June 11, 2012 Share Posted June 11, 2012 Train module?........ xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts