BF 109 K-4 Additional guns - Page 3 - ED Forums
 


Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-15-2016, 01:46 PM   #21
Kurfürst
Member
 
Kurfürst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 792
Default

109K Rüstsaetze from manual
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	109K_Rustsatz_list.png
Views:	188
Size:	92.9 KB
ID:	151671   Click image for larger version

Name:	109K_Rustsatz_profiles.png
Views:	258
Size:	51.9 KB
ID:	151672  
__________________
www.kurfurst.org - The Messerschmitt Bf 109 Performance Resource Site

Vezérünk a bátorság, Kísérőnk a szerencse!
-Motto of the RHAF 101st 'Puma' Home Air Defense Fighter Regiment
The Answer to the Ultimate Question of the K-4, the Universe, and Everything: Powerloading 550 HP / ton, 1593 having been made up to 31th March 1945, 314 K-4s were being operated in frontline service on 31 January 1945.
Kurfürst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2016, 02:42 PM   #22
razo+r
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,466
Default

I know, but i would like to have a Rüstsatz like the IV in the manual or like the V on the second picture (if those are gunpods or rocket pods) ingame, even though it probably didn't got really used
__________________

Rig: Maximus VII Ranger, 4790K @ 4.00 Ghz, MSI GTX 980 Ti, 16 GB non-oc RAM, 250 GB SAMSUNG EVO 850 SSD, 2TB HDD, Win 10 64-bit

Last edited by razo+r; 11-15-2016 at 02:54 PM.
razo+r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2016, 03:01 PM   #23
Solty
Senior Member
 
Solty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Poland
Posts: 1,684
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by razo+r View Post
I know, but i would like to have a Rüstsatz like the IV in the manual or like the V on the second picture (if those are gunpods or rocket pods) ingame, even though it probably didn't got really used
I don't see why assume they were not used. It just might be not well documented, but their existance is irrefutable, therfore I assume ED will add them. Sadly, just as the new DM and P-51D model, that might take a while.
__________________
In 21st century there is only war and ponies.

My experience: Jane's attack squadron, IL2 for couple of years, War Thunder and DCS.
My channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyA..._Sqdc0IKJuv6dA
Solty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2016, 03:05 PM   #24
razo+r
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,466
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Solty View Post
I don't see why assume they were not used. It just might be not well documented, but their existance is irrefutable, therfore I assume ED will add them. Sadly, just as the new DM and P-51D model, that might take a while.
Well, i said maybe they weren't really used, but nvm

Well, let's hope
__________________

Rig: Maximus VII Ranger, 4790K @ 4.00 Ghz, MSI GTX 980 Ti, 16 GB non-oc RAM, 250 GB SAMSUNG EVO 850 SSD, 2TB HDD, Win 10 64-bit
razo+r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2016, 02:58 AM   #25
WildBillKelsoe
Veteran
 
WildBillKelsoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cairo, Egypt
Posts: 6,255
Default

I believe ED will include Rustsatz at a later update.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
AWAITING ED NEW DAMAGE MODEL IMPLEMENTATION FOR WW2 BIRDS

Fat T is above, thin T is below. Long T is faster, Short T is slower. Open triangle is AWACS, closed triangle is your own sensors. Double dash is friendly, Single dash is enemy. Circle is friendly. Strobe is jammer. Strobe to dash is under 35 km. HDD is 7 times range key. Radar to 160 km, IRST to 10 km. Stay low, but never slow.
WildBillKelsoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2016, 01:38 PM   #26
ACG_IronJockel
Member
 
ACG_IronJockel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 426
Default

The 109 Cockpit already has the switch for additional guns modeled. I guess this is enough confirmation.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I8200N mit Tapatalk
__________________
ACG_IronJockel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2016, 05:55 PM   #27
razo+r
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,466
Default

maybe one day?

Who knows...

https://www.dropbox.com/s/4i7p9p2dep...annt1.PNG?dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/s/v3uy0buc9d...annt2.PNG?dl=0
__________________

Rig: Maximus VII Ranger, 4790K @ 4.00 Ghz, MSI GTX 980 Ti, 16 GB non-oc RAM, 250 GB SAMSUNG EVO 850 SSD, 2TB HDD, Win 10 64-bit
razo+r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2016, 10:53 AM   #28
x39crazy
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 133
Default

You do realize they will come with a huge performance disadvantage right?
x39crazy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2016, 11:34 AM   #29
Buzzles
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Northern Europe
Posts: 2,580
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by x39crazy View Post
You do realize they will come with a huge performance disadvantage right?
"Performance" depends on what you're using it for. If you're not going to be dogfighting then the penalities are a moot point. The extra firepower will be handy for ground attacks.
Buzzles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2016, 12:07 PM   #30
antagonist
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 240
Default

To be honest, I'd rather have the option for an MG151/20 engine cannon instead of two of them (or two more 30mm MK108 grenade launchers) in underslung pods.
antagonist is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:15 AM. vBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys. Powered by vBulletin®.
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.