TERMINATE DCS

I, as an Italian virtual pilot, feel offended ......

you told me that my ideas are ridiculous

and you told me I'm a troll

I have bought all the modules of dcs honoring your program with honor but I do not intend to be treated in this way because it is not education in respect of special features of one who speaks another language.

So many electrons bothered for nothing...

OMG...Fighter Ops ...LMAO.

Please stop

Nah, please continue. As I said, whatever passes the time.

The Italian has a right to his or her opinion.

N.1 I'm not a troll.

but do you think that we Italians are so ignorant that we can not plan a simulator on our own?

without using super computers I show you an Italian simulation programmed on a simple app.

 

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=it.rortos.panlite&hl=it ----------------su sistema android

 

https://itunes.apple.com/it/app/frecce-tricolori-fs-pro/id1116182293?mt=8 ------------- su sistema ios

mobile "sims" better than DCS?

^^^^

Although my reaction in general to the nature of this thead

Sure lets cancel dcs because it doesnt every every single feature( many of them ridiculous) that 1 person wants.

...or the Nazi spaceship ....still , in his defense , i do enjoy his photo essays .

yeah, like in BF1942-Forgotten_Hope mod, that secretly hidden Haunebu was fun, haha

delete this thread, from A-Z...please. There is nothing to see...move on :pilotfly::pilotfly:

Nah, please continue. As I said, whatever passes the time.

please no, I beg of you

Give me your PC, your modules, and your HOTAS.

 

And,,,,, the winner is...:megalol:

I, as an Italian virtual pilot, feel offended ......

you told me that my ideas are ridiculous

and you told me I'm a troll

I have bought all the modules of dcs honoring your program with honor but I do not intend to be treated in this way because it is not education in respect of special features of one who speaks another language.

Sorry your feelings have been hurt......

....bye Felicia.....

I, as an Italian virtual pilot, feel offended ......

you told me that my ideas are ridiculous

and you told me I'm a troll

But what did you expect with that Thread title? .. if you dont understand english well enough then you could stick to the Italian subforum.

I would settle for a world without dickheads

you gotta love this guy!:)

I, as an Italian virtual pilot, feel offended ......

you told me that my ideas are ridiculous

and you told me I'm a troll

I have bought all the modules of dcs honoring your program with honor but I do not intend to be treated in this way because it is not education in respect of special features of one who speaks another language.

As pointed out above, your thread title & OP come across to native English speakers as negative and provocative, and your idea that because some very niche areas are missing (though a couple of the things you've said are missing are not) the sim should be abandoned is neither constructive nor realistic.

You have a right to express your wishes (though why you would wish to deny everyone else the ability to fly DCS & call on E.D. to terminate their business because you personally have niggles about their product is beyond me).

If you express them carelessly, people have a right to be offended.

You did, they are.

Edit:

-possibility of a world map and long-range missions-----------------------------------------NEGATIVE

True there is no world map, but it's not a Far Cry map - there's no destruct mechanism if you leave the map's populated area. If you're prepared to air start, you can start any distance from the target & refuel on the way in as many times as you want.

I have entered the coordinates on the F-18, taken off from Iran & landed in Kabul...

-possibility of using all types of weapons including weapons of mass destruction.---------NEGATIVE

WMD already exist (in a variety of forms), and can be further simulated with triggers. All other weapon types except chemical and biological are already able to be added, and those two could again be affected using triggers or scripts.

-possibility of even exceeding the earth's atmosphere will reach the space with the U-2 type airplanes.---NEGATIVE

There's noting in the simulation of the atmosphere, flight models or propulsion in DCS that stops this.

You could have a U-2 in DCS if someone made a module, there's just no use for it.

There's also nothing to stop you modelling an X-15 & getting your astronaut badge if you want to, just no one with the skills thinks it's a good idea.

You are wrong...

my DESIRE and TERMINARE DCS as a project and start again with a new project that creates the simulation of a real world war with missions of every kind of every kind and every destructive proportion. people from a simulator do not want peace do not want to see censorship people just want to simulate WAR in all its forms of violence, blood and destruction.

First of all, ED has said already that their ultimate goal in terms of the terrain is the Earth, this is technically not achievable yet when you combine terrain fidelity and detail with the processing power of commercial PC hardware. There is other simulation computer software that offers this type of experience in low fidelity, low terrain resolution. DCS is fundamentally different by design.

Seaplanes can be used if created by either ED or third party. If there was a market to justify resources and effort.

Weapons of mass destruction - see MiG-21, again something that can be included so the possibility is there.

"Our dream is to offer the most authentic and realistic simulation of military aircraft, tanks, ground vehicles and ships possible." - http://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com -- I believe SAM simulation is the scope of Combined Arms.

U-2 exceeding Earth atmosphere - the day this happens most DCS users will stop using it. First, get your facts straight about atmosphere layers, then read at least basic U-2 capabilities.

U-Boats or other submarine warfare is the pretty much same case as with the seaplanes. I believe there would also need to be improved EDGE to account for underwater operations. However, the possibility is there.

So, if you take all that, I am glad you are not in charge if DCS, as terminating this "project" and starting a new one would put us exactly in the same spot.

See with the progression that DCS has made through all these years is not the case of one "project". It is, in fact, continuous development and improvement effort of a piece of software that has its objectives, goals, dreams and most importantly tremendous achievements.

I understand you are not a native English speaker but nevertheless, everything you said is simply not valid.

I don't think they'd have to replace the game engine to take advantage of these things. I'm sure that over time more features will be added and eventually as technology increases they might make a newer engine that does!

This guy is special, can we keep him?

With regards to SAMs, I'm fairly certain that you can already do some of this, at least with IR SAMs, in Combined Arms. I haven't played around with it in a while, but I distinctly remember when CA was first released, I made a quick mission and played around with shooting down helicopters using one of the vehicles that had SAM capability (I think it was the M-6).

This guy is special, can we keep him?

Yah, as a mascot please? All for it.

You speak on behalf of all Italians?

No, he/she does not‼

mobile "sims" better than DCS?

 

 

 

^^^^

 

Although my reaction in general to the nature of this thead

Sure lets cancel dcs because it doesnt every every single feature( many of them ridiculous) that 1 person wants.

Of course! Makes perfect sense! He paid his Lira!

you gotta love this guy!:)

Yeah but who would we have a laugh at then?

At least now I know I’m not the only one who watched stargate around here!

As pointed out above, your thread title & OP come across to native English speakers as negative and provocative, and your idea that because some very niche areas are missing (though a couple of the things you've said are missing are not) the sim should be abandoned is neither constructive nor realistic.

 

You have a right to express your wishes (though why you would wish to deny everyone else the ability to fly DCS & call on E.D. to terminate their business because you personally have niggles about their product is beyond me).

 

If you express them carelessly, people have a right to be offended.

You did, they are.

 

 

Edit:

 

True there is no world map, but it's not a Far Cry map - there's no destruct mechanism if you leave the map's populated area. If you're prepared to air start, you can start any distance from the target & refuel on the way in as many times as you want.

I have entered the coordinates on the F-18, taken off from Iran & landed in Kabul...

 

 

WMD already exist (in a variety of forms), and can be further simulated with triggers. All other weapon types except chemical and biological are already able to be added, and those two could again be affected using triggers or scripts.

 

 

There's noting in the simulation of the atmosphere, flight models or propulsion in DCS that stops this.

You could have a U-2 in DCS if someone made a module, there's just no use for it.

There's also nothing to stop you modelling an X-15 & getting your astronaut badge if you want to, just no one with the skills thinks it's a good idea.

While I appreciate your attempt to bring logic into this... :music_whistling:

But I am intrigued about the whole air-starting off the map, is there some guide on how to do that?

This guy is special, can we keep him?

Thats a big +1 here!

:)