HawkDCS Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 Are the FF Tapes still showing TF30 stats or are they correct for F110 now? Rig: 5960X @ 4.5GHZ 32GB 3000Mhz DDR4 Titan XP Dell 3415W 21:9 Thrustmaster Warthog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuiGon Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 They're still wrong... :music_whistling: Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Airhunter Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 Nothing visual has been fixed since released, 6 months later... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blinde Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 How hard is it to just change those. Simple texutres. Seriously Heatblur, it's been over 6 months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eldur Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 They're still wrong... :music_whistling: Well the FF is not. And I guess the RPM neither. So it's just one tape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banzaiib Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 How hard is it to just change those. Simple texutres. Seriously Heatblur, it's been over 6 months. FM over textures... i like HB's priorities in this regard. I can wait for this one to be fixed... would rather have a Forrestal and the 14A, quite frankly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Airhunter Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 FM over textures... i like HB's priorities in this regard. I can wait for this one to be fixed... would rather have a Forrestal and the 14A, quite frankly. Yeah but is the same guy who does FM working on textures? I highly doubt it. Same goes for the "COMP" pressure reading on the hydraulics panel, which should read "COMB" instead. A simple letter change, which was even correct on the imagines in the online manual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AvroLanc Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 I think we all need to bear in mind that the Viggen is still waiting for visual fixes over 2 and a half years after release........ We really need an update to both the Tomcat and Viggen roadmap status. The textures guy is Cobra himself I believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blinde Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 FM over textures... i like HB's priorities in this regard. I can wait for this one to be fixed... would rather have a Forrestal and the 14A, quite frankly. Flightmodel which keeps changing constantly... From good to not so good. Very little of those promised features and things have been added. I don't own the Viggen but if it's still so unfinished like AvroLanc said, I'm not keeping my fingers crossed on F-14. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eldur Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 FM over textures... i like HB's priorities in this regard. I can wait for this one to be fixed... would rather have a Forrestal and the 14A, quite frankly. And I'd rather be able to read the Viggen's weapon selector knob over all of that. Looks like a texture from the early 90s still. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vadupleix Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 Can this be fixed by a simple user made skin mod or not? I’m not sure what’s the difference so just asking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronMike Posted September 18, 2019 Share Posted September 18, 2019 It's being done guys, it is just listed differently priority wise, as you and us both wished. I get the frustration, but pls consider that the Tomcat is still one of the most feature complete modules in early access. And it took very long to get there, 6 years for the company to build up to that, 4.5 years for the module alone, the reason is quality. We apply this very same principle to everything else yet to come, and hence we take the time needed. That doesn't mean we don't try to be quick, we do. But most and foremost we want to get it right and unfortunately we have to prioritize for that. Heatblur Simulations Please feel free to contact me anytime, either via PM here, on the forums, or via email through the contact form on our homepage. http://www.heatblur.com/ https://www.facebook.com/heatblur/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts