GGTharos Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 I know what you are saying and I agree that it would be nice. Totally. I also know how the software business world works and basically, save for the kindness of the programmers, if you really want to know, or make something happen, $40 is not enough. dont overdrive GG .....just few foundations .... giving a glimps and also ...no, even....underlining the quality of a product (of course noone requests the source code and all secrets ...but selling eggs as gold becomes old man) :smilewink: [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilotasso Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 (edited) 1.02 the AMRAAM which is way overmodeled. :D People are happy to point out the 120's flaws but never mention the outrageous moves it manages to pull off. A patch is the only way to solve these long standing issues IMO. The only thing the AMRAAM is overmodeled is something that also shares with every russian missiles: 180 degrees instantaneous sensor search. The outrageous manuvers it makes are also made by all other missiles. Except it is the slowest BVR missile and has the poorest PK. So complaining about the AMRAAM like this is falling for bias a bit and somewhat redundant since it is the sensors code that has to be changed and not the missile per se. Edited July 23, 2009 by Pilotasso [sigpic]http://forums.eagle.ru/signaturepics/sigpic4448_29.gif[/sigpic] My PC specs below:Case: Corsair 400C PSU: SEASONIC SS-760XP2 760W Platinum CPU: AMD RYZEN 3900X (12C/24T) RAM: 32 GB 4266Mhz (two 2x8 kits) of trident Z RGB @3600Mhz CL 14 CR=1T MOBO: ASUS CROSSHAIR HERO VI AM4 GFX: GTX 1080Ti MSI Gaming X Cooler: NXZT Kraken X62 280mm AIO Storage: Samsung 960 EVO 1TB M.2+6GB WD 6Gb red HOTAS: Thrustmaster Warthog + CH pro pedals Monitor: Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD Freesync HDR400 1440P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.S Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 (edited) I also know how the software business world works and basically, save for the kindness of the programmers, if you really want to know, or make something happen, $40 is not enough. Do you know how the "software bussiness world works" or do you know how DCS bussiness philosophy respective to "marketings-goals" look like :smilewink: ? :music_whistling: Edited July 23, 2009 by A.S [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGTharos Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 Do you know how the "software bussiness world works" Yeah, I do. 1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.S Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 smart dodge.. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RvEYoda Posted July 23, 2009 Author Share Posted July 23, 2009 Hello, I is back from vacation ;) S = SPARSE(m,n) abbreviates SPARSE([],[],[],m,n,0). This generates the ultimate sparse matrix, an m-by-n all zero matrix. - Matlab help on 'sparse' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RvETito Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 Me too... :( "See, to me that's a stupid instrument. It tells what your angle of attack is. If you don't know you shouldn't be flying." - Chuck Yeager, from the back seat of F-15D at age 89. =RvE= Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
104th_Crunch Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 Welcome back Yoda! Hi Tito. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3Sqn_Sven Posted July 24, 2009 Share Posted July 24, 2009 The only thing the AMRAAM is overmodeled is something that also shares with every russian missiles: 180 degrees instantaneous sensor search. The outrageous manuvers it makes are also made by all other missiles. Except it is the slowest BVR missile and has the poorest PK. So complaining about the AMRAAM like this is falling for bias a bit and somewhat redundant since it is the sensors code that has to be changed and not the missile per se. Exactly 3Sqn - Largest distributor of Flanker, Fulcrum and Frogfoot parts in the Black Sea Region Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moa Posted July 24, 2009 Share Posted July 24, 2009 It's my understanding that the LockOn internal state maintans what type of lock an aircraft has on another. Isn't maddog simply a launch without a valid lock? Therefore I've always thought that stopping maddogs was a simple matter of looking at that data. See: -- Weapon Control System LoGetTargetInformation() -- (args - 0, results - 1 (table of current targets tables)) LoGetLockedTargetInformation() -- (args - 0, results - 1 (table of current locked targets tables)) this functions return the table of the next target data target = { ID , -- world ID (may be 0 ,when ground point track) type = {level1,level2,level3,level4}, -- world database classification country = , -- object country position = {x = {x,y,z}, -- orientation X ort y = {x,y,z}, -- orientation Y ort z = {x,y,z}, -- orientation Z ort p = {x,y,z}} -- position of the center velocity = {x,y,z}, -- world velocity vector m/s distance = , -- distance in meters convergence_velocity = , -- closing speed in m/s mach = , -- M number delta_psi = , -- aspect angle rad fim = , -- viewing angle horizontal (in your body axis) rad fin = , -- viewing angle vertical (in your body axis) rad flags = , -- field with constants detemining method of the tracking -- whTargetRadarView -- whTargetEOSView -- whTargetRadarLock -- whTargetEOSLock -- whTargetRadarTrack -- whTargetEOSTrack -- whTargetNetHumanPlane = 0x0200; -- whTargetAutoLockOn = 0x0400; -- whTargetLockOnJammer = 0x0800; reflection = , -- target cross section square meters course = , -- target course rad isjamming = , -- target ECM on or not start_of_lock = , -- time of the beginning of lock forces = { x,y,z}, -- vector of the acceleration units updates_number = , -- number of the radar updates } specified at: http://lockon.co.uk/index.php?lang=en&end_pos=567&scr=default This would require adding some info to the lua export. Perhaps record to a socket or another file rather than the file that TacView uses (that is, so TacView still works). Sorry Yoda, I don't have time to follow up on this (or the DirectX overlay stuff at the moment). Hoping things will quiet down soon an I can give you a bit more of a hand with some of this stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Case Posted July 24, 2009 Share Posted July 24, 2009 It's my understanding that the LockOn internal state maintans what type of lock an aircraft has on another. Isn't maddog simply a launch without a valid lock? Therefore I've always thought that stopping maddogs was a simple matter of looking at that data.You can lock a bandit far beyond the maximum range of your missile, meaning that you have a lock, but are not (yet) authorized to launch. With IR missiles you can have an EOS lock and be within maximum range, but not have the launch authorization because the missiles seeker has not locked onto the target. So it is not as simple. There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moa Posted July 24, 2009 Share Posted July 24, 2009 You can lock a bandit far beyond the maximum range of your missile, meaning that you have a lock, but are not (yet) authorized to launch. With IR missiles you can have an EOS lock and be within maximum range, but not have the launch authorization because the missiles seeker has not locked onto the target. So it is not as simple. True, but at least you will eliminate the maddoggers that don't know where the enemy is and simply launch to see where it goes. Or launch outside the missile's seeker cone, since this is not properly modeled. Having an lock, using launch override and launching over maximum range is a flaw in the missile kinematics not the seeker code (and easily defeated by even a partial angle-off turn). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RvEYoda Posted July 24, 2009 Author Share Posted July 24, 2009 Unfortunately there are some issues with lua exports in this situation. Not all lock types export the required data (some dont export at all). Yes Moa I actually had a variant using this specific data you are mentioning, but unfortunately the export is not consistent on several parts, (This is the main reason why LRM is so many lines, it is basically workarounds for possible bugs in the LUA export.) I can go into more detail if you catch me on msn/icq,. S = SPARSE(m,n) abbreviates SPARSE([],[],[],m,n,0). This generates the ultimate sparse matrix, an m-by-n all zero matrix. - Matlab help on 'sparse' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarlosFLY Posted August 2, 2009 Share Posted August 2, 2009 Some were trashy already mod. This is on the first place! Onto nothing not good! To ruin an entertainment good. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GUMAR Posted May 6, 2010 Share Posted May 6, 2010 Yoda, what do you think about making LRM Mod for FC 2? Can we expect that you make it? Because features like limited taxi speed and engine running time, etc are so useful. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Реальные хотелки к ЛО3 по Су-25 в основном... ASRock PG9, i-5 9600KF, MSI 2080Ti, 32GB 3466 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RvEYoda Posted May 6, 2010 Author Share Posted May 6, 2010 no, not possible with fc2 architecture. S = SPARSE(m,n) abbreviates SPARSE([],[],[],m,n,0). This generates the ultimate sparse matrix, an m-by-n all zero matrix. - Matlab help on 'sparse' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts