Gaanalma Posted June 12, 2012 Share Posted June 12, 2012 Sensors http://typhoon.starstreak.net/Eurofighter/sensors.html I hope there are info on 'avionics that still did not know ... if it helps keep looking and post [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] www.36stormovirtuale.net Link to comment
F l a n k e r Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 (edited) Never hearth of Navier-Strokes equation...... gonna look it up. The N-S are three equations that model both fluid- and aero-dynamics flows... the problem is that these eq. are not solvable analytically (if not for very simple cases), and also are too detailed (describing the flow point by point), so the aerodynamicists use approximations or numerical methods (computer fluid dynamics codes, or CFD). Edited June 13, 2012 by F l a n k e r Link to comment
KL0083 Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 I wonder if that'll be a Caesar to arm the EFA on this one................ Link to comment
jazjar Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 Oh boy... Seems like an important part of the CAPTOR is classified, Gaanalma's website says that the amount of targets that can be tracked is classfiied, apparently. Isn't that rather important to know? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment
Eddie Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 Oh boy... Seems like an important part of the CAPTOR is classified, Gaanalma's website says that the amount of targets that can be tracked is classfiied, apparently. Isn't that rather important to know? It's not widely publicised but it is out there if you know where to look. Spoiler Intel 13900K (5Ghz), 64Gb 6400Mhz, MSi RTX 3090, Schiit Modi/Magi DAC/AMP, ASUS PG43UQ, Hotas Warthog, RealSimulator FSSB3, 2x TM MFDs + DCS MFDs, MFG Crosswinds, Elgato Steamdeck XL Link to comment
jazjar Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 Ooo Eddie, man with the sources, yeah! ;) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment
Ells228 Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 There are reports that the radar can "see" through 120-140 degrees laterally, with a range against fighter-sized targets in excess of 86nm (160km) and up to 162nm (300km) against transport aircraft. It has been suggested that the radar can simutaniously track up to 20 targets, and can engage six. Link to comment
Pikey Posted June 27, 2012 Share Posted June 27, 2012 There are reports that the radar can "see" through 120-140 degrees laterally, with a range against fighter-sized targets in excess of 86nm (160km) and up to 162nm (300km) against transport aircraft. It has been suggested that the radar can simutaniously track up to 20 targets, and can engage six. Not on my hardware!:cry: But seriously....I haven't played a simulation of any aircraft that's semi recent. I can see it being a seriously interesting experience with that kind of technology and to learn in the depth of what I did for a10 and BS ___________________________________________________________________________ SIMPLE SCENERY SAVING * SIMPLE GROUP SAVING * SIMPLE STATIC SAVING * Link to comment
rattler Posted June 27, 2012 Share Posted June 27, 2012 Not on my hardware!:cry: But seriously....I haven't played a simulation of any aircraft that's semi recent. I can see it being a seriously interesting experience with that kind of technology and to learn in the depth of what I did for a10 and BS I don't think any Company that Produced the Typhoon had that much accuracy to the radar model, so don't worry you can still put up a good fight against it.:) rattler Link to comment
EtherealN Posted June 27, 2012 Share Posted June 27, 2012 My favourite feature of the Typhoon is buddy-launching AAM's. You guide my weapon from somewhere else via datalinks and I'll keep EMCON while exposed for the shot. :) (And I expect more aircraft do have this feature, I know it's been suggested one of the new or coming upgrades to the Gripen will include this as well, and I'd be extremely surprised if the americans and russians aren't doing this as well, especially the americans, considering that on the Typhoon this was tested with Slammers and not one of the european missiles.) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Daniel "EtherealN" Agorander | Даниэль "эфирныйн" Агорандер Intel i7 2600K @ 4.4GHz, ASUS Sabertooth P67, 8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1600MHz, ASUS GTX 560Ti DirectCU II 1GB, Samsung 830series 512GB SSD, Corsair AX850w, two BENQ screens and TM HOTAS Warthog DCS: A-10C Warthog FAQ | DCS: P-51D FAQ | Remember to read the Forum Rules | | | Life of a Game Tester Link to comment
Ells228 Posted June 27, 2012 Share Posted June 27, 2012 I heard the Raptor was getting a similar data link function also. These are mean planes haha Link to comment
Jona33 Posted June 27, 2012 Share Posted June 27, 2012 Not on my hardware!:cry: But seriously....I haven't played a simulation of any aircraft that's semi recent. I can see it being a seriously interesting experience with that kind of technology and to learn in the depth of what I did for a10 and BS In what way is the A-10 not semi recent? Always remember. I don't have a clue what I'm doing Link to comment
Randolf Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 In what way is the A-10 not semi recent? Because it's first flight was during the 70's, some 40 years ago? Link to comment
MTFDarkEagle Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 Because it's first flight was during the 70's, some 40 years ago? The first BMW 3-series is produced from 1975 to current. If you see a 2012 3-series, is that still not semi recent? ;) Lukas - "TIN TIN" - 9th Shrek Air Strike Squadron TIN TIN's Cockpit thread Link to comment
Jona33 Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 Because it's first flight was during the 70's, some 40 years ago? A-10C Always remember. I don't have a clue what I'm doing Link to comment
Wichid Posted July 1, 2012 Share Posted July 1, 2012 Aren't all the A-10C's just old A-10A's that have been upgraded. They aren't actually new planes. Lyndiman AMD Ryzen 3600 / RTX 2070 Super / 32G Ram / Win10 / TrackIR 5 Pro / Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS & MFG Crosswind Rudder Pedals Link to comment
astrospud Posted July 1, 2012 Share Posted July 1, 2012 Aren't all the A-10C's just old A-10A's that have been upgraded. They aren't actually new planes. http://warthognews.blogspot.com.au/search/label/A-10%20Wing%20Replacement%20Program%20%28WRP%29 With new sensor suite, and a service life extension program that continues the A-10 in action well into the early half of the 21st century, it may as well be a new aircraft. Rectum non bustus Link to comment
nemises Posted July 1, 2012 Share Posted July 1, 2012 Aren't all the A-10C's just old A-10A's that have been upgraded. They aren't actually new planes. depends on your definition I suppose... is the airframe from the 70's?..yep however the control linkages(?), engines and avionics (and not to mention mission role) are all strictly 21st century Link to comment
louisv Posted July 1, 2012 Share Posted July 1, 2012 And that makes the C a different beast because it is not used the same way... A-10A is used down and dirty while the sensors on the A-10c allow it to take the high road. MSI Z170A Titanium Edition mobo + 6700K CPU 32 GB G.Skill TridentZ memory 3200 MHz Sandisk Extreme Pro 256 GB SSD Samsung 950 Pro 512 GB M.2 SSD (3 GB/s) for DCS and +. HP ZR24W Monitor, EVGA GTX 1080ti FE Thrustmaster Warthog, MFG CrossWind rudder... and Oculus Rift CV1. Link to comment
Jona33 Posted July 1, 2012 Share Posted July 1, 2012 And that makes the C a different beast because it is not used the same way... A-10A is used down and dirty while the sensors on the A-10c allow it to take the high road. Although when it got used it was at medium altitude. Always remember. I don't have a clue what I'm doing Link to comment
Eddie Posted July 1, 2012 Share Posted July 1, 2012 And that makes the C a different beast because it is not used the same way... A-10A is used down and dirty while the sensors on the A-10c allow it to take the high road. While they can be used at medium level most real world training is still centred on the same low level tactics used with the A model during the cold war. The C model adds to the capabilities that already existed, it doesn't replace them. Spoiler Intel 13900K (5Ghz), 64Gb 6400Mhz, MSi RTX 3090, Schiit Modi/Magi DAC/AMP, ASUS PG43UQ, Hotas Warthog, RealSimulator FSSB3, 2x TM MFDs + DCS MFDs, MFG Crosswinds, Elgato Steamdeck XL Link to comment
aaron886 Posted July 1, 2012 Share Posted July 1, 2012 Thread is hopelessly derailed. Link to comment
Pougatchev Posted July 1, 2012 Share Posted July 1, 2012 (edited) Thread is hopelessly derailed. As usual :music_whistling: Some people loss the function of private chatting, or simply create a new thread :D PS: I'm joking, but recentering the thread can be nice for some ghostreader like me :D Edited July 1, 2012 by Pougatchev [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Make the reporting system great again! https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=234508 Link to comment
Teapot Posted July 1, 2012 Share Posted July 1, 2012 Thread is hopelessly derailed. (Unexpectedly from out of the left flank ...) I read somewhere once that real world fighter pilots do Paleo in order to enhance the proficiency of the primary ocular nerve. Is this the case? If so I'm doing it to enhance the sense if "being there". You know, high fidelity realism. :D ... and all ... "A true 'sandbox flight sim' requires hi-fidelity flyable non-combat utility/support aircraft." Wishlist Terrains - Bigger maps Wishlist Modules - A variety of utility aircraft to better reflect the support role. E.g. Flying the Hornet ... big yawn ... flying a Caribou on a beer run to Singapore? Count me in. Extracting a Recon Patrol from a hastily prepared landing strip at a random 6 figure grid reference? Now yer talking! Link to comment
Recommended Posts