Beamscanner Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 The ALR-67(V2) was added to the Hornet with the "Engineering Change Procedure ECP-510". Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AN/ALR-67_Radar_Warning_Receiver This RWR upgrade added the following: "INS stabilization for accurate display in high g maneuvers and during high roll maneuvers." Engineering Change Procedure ECP-510 took place in the early-mid 1990s. Source: http://www.anft.net/f-14/f14-squadron-vx4.htm, https://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/equip/an-alr-67.htm What this means is that the RWR symbols should move to counter the aircraft's own movement after initial detection. ie during a high g turn, the symbol should smoothly slide in clock position to continue to match the bearing of its last detection. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harker Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 +1. We need that badly. AFAIK, our Hornet and Harrier both have the AN/ALR-67(V2), so it should work like it does in the Harrier, I believe, which appears to be implementing INS stabilization. The vCVW-17 is looking for Hornet and Tomcat pilots and RIOs. Join the vCVW-17 Discord. F/A-18C, F-15E, AV-8B, F-16C, JF-17, A-10C/CII, M-2000C, F-14, AH-64D, BS2, UH-1H, P-51D, Sptifire, FC3 - i9-13900K, 64GB @6400MHz RAM, 4090 Strix OC, Samsung 990 Pro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harlikwin Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 In before the guy that claims we shouldn't bother with that icky ECM/EW stuff. New hotness: I7 9700k 4.8ghz, 32gb ddr4, 2080ti, :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, HP Reverb (formermly CV1) Old-N-busted: i7 4720HQ ~3.5GHZ, +32GB DDR3 + Nvidia GTX980m (4GB VRAM) :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, Rift CV1 (yes really). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jak525 Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 Agreed. RWR is useless when maneuvering without this, if anything it causes more confusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nighthawk2174 Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 Didn't the 88's HUD box do the same thing? I'm sensing a pattern here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harlikwin Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 Didn't the 88's HUD box do the same thing? I'm sensing a pattern here. Well, we don't have INS really modeled in the first place... New hotness: I7 9700k 4.8ghz, 32gb ddr4, 2080ti, :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, HP Reverb (formermly CV1) Old-N-busted: i7 4720HQ ~3.5GHZ, +32GB DDR3 + Nvidia GTX980m (4GB VRAM) :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, Rift CV1 (yes really). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kev2go Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 Yea seems like this would be an easy enough function ( given general description) to emulate, to represent the an/alr67 v2. Given its 21st century hornet it would certainly be using that rwr Build: Windows 10 64 bit Pro Case/Tower: Corsair Graphite 760tm ,Asus Strix Z790 Motherboard, Intel Core i7 12700k ,Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 64gb ram (3600 mhz) , (Asus strix oc edition) Nvidia RTX 3080 12gb , Evga g2 850 watt psu, Hardrives ; Samsung 970 EVo, , Samsung evo 860 pro 1 TB SSD, Samsung evo 850 pro 1TB SSD, WD 1TB HDD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_mu110_ Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 I think there are a few different elements that update slowly but should be stabilized in between refreshes, datalink contacts on the SA page also come to mind. Check out my skins and mods on the User Files. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beamscanner Posted September 19, 2019 Author Share Posted September 19, 2019 Perhaps ED will revisit this when working on the F-16 RWR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mapi Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 Perhaps ED will revisit this when working on the F-16 RWR Then it's a wrong order. False world. :joystick: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arctander Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 Then it's a wrong order. False world. :joystick: Agreed, but in spite of logic, and 'fair' they appear to be working on the Viper systems and then porting them over to the Hornet in spite of these types of things being 'on the radar' for some time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beamscanner Posted May 30, 2022 Author Share Posted May 30, 2022 Video evidence from VFA-105. Watch the movement of the RWR track - "2" while the pilot makes a right hand bank (9:14-9:20) VFA-105 did not transition to the Super Hornet until 2006. So this is likely the ALR-67(v2), and is not the ALR-67(v3). 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ahmed Posted June 5, 2022 Share Posted June 5, 2022 Good point, I submitted that clip among others several times that got added to an "open" bug report about the RWR having mixed features from before and after CONFIG/IDENT 92A and thus being wrong both ways, but didn't think about mentioning stabilization. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts