Mirage F1 - Page 3 - ED Forums
 


Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-19-2014, 10:27 AM   #21
Sajonez
Junior Member
 
Sajonez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 12
Default

@Buzzles Alright, this is a good answer. Thank you.

@NeilWillis Oh my...Once again I am saying its called honest feedback from online player, nothing more... If some developer will write down that he doesnt stand for this kind of feedback from potential customer, than its pretty clear. Sure I have a choice to buy or not to buy, to support or not to support...words just explain reasons better than purchase numbers. So far, Ive supported everything and looking forward for other projects...and here, I am looking forward for Mirage F1.
__________________
Pilot of the CSAF - TL RAVEN

TL RAVEN logo
Sajonez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2014, 10:41 AM   #22
NeilWillis
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4,714
Default

Very fair point Sajonez, and I wouldn't ever want to censor anyone. However, and here is the thing that annoys me, as I am sure it does many others.

First, it isn't stating anything that hasn't been said ad nauseum before.
Second, he hijacked a thread to make his comments - that's not very good netiquette.
Third, how is a prejudice feedback? All he says is he doesn't like training aircraft. Is that feedback, or just background noise? No one says he has to like what is released. Useful feedback should take the form of making a simple choice. Buy it, or don't buy it.

Isn't that also relevant here? I guess getting on for 1/4 of all posts here are in the form of pointless opinions about which product someone would or wouldn't buy; debating when a product will be released; stating that they prefer one or other genre (just how many WW2/modern debates do we need?). After a while it just gets very boring frankly.

I guess you could also say that these responses that slate people for it are also getting past a joke, and frankly, yes they are. So I apologise if I have stirred the pot on that score.

Is it really just honest feedback? To me it was unnecessary, and inappropriate - that's just MY honest feedback.
NeilWillis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014, 10:50 PM   #23
Iberian
Member
 
Iberian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Miami
Posts: 378
Send a message via ICQ to Iberian
Default

I find the C-101 very interesting aircraft choice, and i can't wait to fly it. I'm an aviation lover so I would even buy a Cessna 172 module if someone was to make one. So to that person that thinks the trainers are less interesting, I'm sure a lot of ppl don't share that thought.

In a way the "simpler" aircraft servers as a way for new groups of developers to get an understanding of how to apply their skills withinthe DCS world platform, so later they can try with a more complex aircraft.

Now back on the topic at hand, the Mirage F1 has battled vs MiG21s often, it would be a great DCS opponent.

Last edited by Iberian; 10-26-2014 at 10:53 PM.
Iberian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2014, 12:36 PM   #24
DocSigma
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 441
Default

Let the Devs develop what they want to develop; they invested the capitol and time affording them that right. My advice is to be grateful that there is constructive - and very productive - cooperation between ED and third party developers enabling expansion of the DCS world/environment. Be patient; and, in time, i'm sure there will be an ample number of combat modules developed that will satiate your combat experience need.

We are mere mortals, and cannot know the minds of the devs
__________________
Watson!
DocSigma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2014, 07:34 PM   #25
JuanOscar
3rd Party Developer
 
JuanOscar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 216
Default

Back to the Mirage F1, is an aircraft really close to the team in many ways, with some work done on it in the past... So we would like to develop the Mirage F1 for sure.

But we have to go step by step, due it is not only depending on us. So we cannot announce anything officially so far... patience
__________________
JuanOscar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2014, 02:35 PM   #26
Stratos
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Spain
Posts: 2,722
Default

So we can train on the C101 then move to the F.1... one day of course
__________________
I don't understand anything in russian except Davai Davai!
Stratos is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2014, 07:09 PM   #27
Poker
Junior Member
 
Poker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Madrid, Spain
Posts: 5
Default

The future looks cool isn´t?
Training on C-101EB, as we are the best in our virtual air force academy we can choose our first combat assignment between:
- Mirage F.1 (who knows, maybe...)
- ED F-18
- VEAO Eurofighter

Almost the same as the real Spanish Air Force! . Someone please add the F-5B in between and that completes the saga...

BTW I was at Aire75, a pleasure to greet you guys at the stand!

JM
__________________
____________________________________________
DCS A-10C, P-51D, F-15C, F-86F, Hawk
Poker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2014, 07:29 PM   #28
Stratos
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Spain
Posts: 2,722
Default

That's my idea too, a virtual spanish AF.
__________________
I don't understand anything in russian except Davai Davai!
Stratos is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 08:57 PM   #29
Iberian
Member
 
Iberian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Miami
Posts: 378
Send a message via ICQ to Iberian
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stratos View Post
That's my idea too, a virtual spanish AF.
I used to run a group of Spanish AF for Flight sim a few years ago (EAE Ejercito del Aire Español) It would be cool to have one in DCS
Iberian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2014, 11:26 AM   #30
kazereal
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Finland
Posts: 636
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iberian View Post
I find the C-101 very interesting aircraft choice, and i can't wait to fly it. I'm an aviation lover so I would even buy a Cessna 172 module if someone was to make one. So to that person that thinks the trainers are less interesting, I'm sure a lot of ppl don't share that thought.
I am much the same way. There are interesting things to in all kinds of aircraft and endless amount of things where people can improve their skills.

I am looking forward to both C-101 and F1 from Aviodev as additions to the growing fleet of aircraft in DCS
__________________
"I would have written a shorter post, but I did not have the time."
kazereal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:05 PM. vBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys. Powered by vBulletin®.
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.