YAK-52 FAQ - Page 4 - ED Forums
 


Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-04-2019, 04:34 PM   #31
Beta Sokol
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Germany
Posts: 91
Default

Just look at the right MLG wheel, there is the shadow.
Maybe an armed version isn´t practicable because of the structural load, stress and also heat. You fly two missions and throw the plane away...
And recoil takes forward energy away, how to evade after attack ?
Beta Sokol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2019, 04:42 PM   #32
Satarosa
Member
 
Satarosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 792
Default lol

Quote:
Originally Posted by hannibal View Post
how come the rocket pod doesnt have a shadow??
And here?











wow gun pod !









ARMAMENT: Ground attack variant can sport: 2 x 32-shot UB-32-57 rocket pods, 2x GUV-8700 (9A669) gun pod, 2x UPK-23-250 gun pod.
__________________
Real War, Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCs..._as=subscriber

Real War, Voice Chat: https://discord.gg/UGa3KMe


Last edited by Satarosa; 01-04-2019 at 04:52 PM.
Satarosa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2019, 04:59 PM   #33
norbot
Member
 
norbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 677
Default

An armed Yak-52 would probably be fun just against unarmed enemies. If flying low, we could be shot down by any soldier armed with an AK-47. Nevertheless it would be nice to have the option to put some armament on the Yak.
__________________
A-10C, AV-8B, F/A-18C, F-5E, Yak-52, NTTR, Persian Gulf, FW 190D-9, Spitfire LF Mk. IX, Normandy + WWII Assets Pack

Last edited by norbot; 01-04-2019 at 05:04 PM.
norbot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2019, 05:13 PM   #34
msalama
Veteran
 
msalama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,003
Default

You know, there're other threads on this subboard. You should read them.

https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php...9&postcount=21
__________________
Huey probs & gripes? Do read the following please: https://forums.eagle.ru/attachment.p...1&d=1555258147
msalama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2019, 05:26 PM   #35
Satarosa
Member
 
Satarosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 792
Post No prob for Infantry and light vehicles

Quote:
Originally Posted by norbot View Post
An armed Yak-52 would probably be fun just against unarmed enemies. If flying low, we could be shot down by any soldier armed with an AK-47. Nevertheless it would be nice to have the option to put some armament on the Yak.
It should be known that the version B had received improvements to be able to carry the armament..


In the tests made at the time the UB-32-57 and GUV-8700 (9A669) was too heavy for this light aircraft and so the dispersion during shooting, and flight performance was not good.

That's why the replacement by a UB-16-57 lighter and UB-32-57 was probably abandoned !

That's why the replacement by a UPK-23-250 lighter and GUV-8700 (9A669) was probably abandoned !
__________________
Real War, Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCs..._as=subscriber

Real War, Voice Chat: https://discord.gg/UGa3KMe

Satarosa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2019, 08:16 AM   #36
msalama
Veteran
 
msalama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,003
Default

Just forget it.

As far as I've understood this was a test platform, even if it received a specific type suffix. And as such, reproducing it here would be a waste of resources, especially when said upgrade wouldn't most likely increase the sales of the module one bit. Because even with the pods, it would be virtually useless in any combat situation.

I know I asked for this myself when the Yak was first released but I've since changed my mind, since modelling the pods would be too much pain for little to no gain. And there's always the L-39, isn't there? An excellent armed trainer with tried and true RL attack capabilities, so by all means fly that if you want lightweight groundpound scenarios. It's what I do myself.
__________________
Huey probs & gripes? Do read the following please: https://forums.eagle.ru/attachment.p...1&d=1555258147
msalama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2019, 09:23 AM   #37
Satarosa
Member
 
Satarosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 792
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by msalama View Post
Just forget it.

As far as I've understood this was a test platform, even if it received a specific type suffix. And as such, reproducing it here would be a waste of resources, especially when said upgrade wouldn't most likely increase the sales of the module one bit. Because even with the pods, it would be virtually useless in any combat situation.

I know I asked for this myself when the Yak was first released but I've since changed my mind, since modelling the pods would be too much pain for little to no gain. And there's always the L-39, isn't there? An excellent armed trainer with tried and true RL attack capabilities, so by all means fly that if you want lightweight groundpound scenarios. It's what I do myself.

Useless in combats situation no, its depences the target and your skill. Like the UH-1H fire power.

His pods are allready modelled and coded in DCS World. For doing the B version only a little work, for all infos
Call the museum..
__________________
Real War, Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCs..._as=subscriber

Real War, Voice Chat: https://discord.gg/UGa3KMe

Satarosa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2019, 10:08 AM   #38
msalama
Veteran
 
msalama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,003
Default

You're stubborn, aren't ya?

I provided a link above where Skatezilla says not planned. So again, just forget it. There's no incentive for ED to do it, so it's not gonna happen. End of.
__________________
Huey probs & gripes? Do read the following please: https://forums.eagle.ru/attachment.p...1&d=1555258147
msalama is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:10 PM. vBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys. Powered by vBulletin®.
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.