Evilducky Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 Im crushed :( Thanks for trying though. This could also be good news in some way maybe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agg Posted November 30, 2012 Share Posted November 30, 2012 If this means that ED is thinking about doing a MiG-29 somewhere down the line, I think it's fantastic news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cedaway Posted November 30, 2012 Share Posted November 30, 2012 If this means that ED is thinking about doing a MiG-29 somewhere down the line, I think it's fantastic news. As stated here... It's not really for tomorrow. DCS Wish: Turbulences affecting surrounding aircraft... [sIGPIC] [/sIGPIC] Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P - Intel Core i5 6600K - 16Gb RAM DDR4-2133 - Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1080 G1 Gaming - 8 Go - 2 x SSD Crucial MX300 - 750 Go RAID0 - Screens: HP OMEN 32'' 2560x1440 + Oculus Rift CV1 - Win 10 - 64bits - TM WARTHOG #889 - Saitek Pro Rudder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph2 Posted November 30, 2012 Share Posted November 30, 2012 I wouldn't disagree with the conclusions drawn, but also think it is in everyone's best interests to wait until our suspicions are proven right/wrong. RAZBAM have tried to do the right thing, in the right way, so lets NOT start an 'oh I think I figured it out' discussion under their 'hey, this is NDA stuff' (ie: don't ask, don't tell) post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agg Posted November 30, 2012 Share Posted November 30, 2012 (edited) As stated here... It's not really for tomorrow.Modelling one of the last versions of the MiG-29 probably wont be possible, for that exact reason, but there's a lot of countries who are flying, or have flown, the early versions of the MiG-29. So getting the information needed to model that, should be possible. There's even a few civilian MiG-29s in the US. Edited November 30, 2012 by Agg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin_Hood Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 (edited) From what Beczl said on the Fishbed section, MiG-21Bis maintenance manuals, even from ex-users other than Russia, are not declassified. So, a MiG-29... Best bet would be civilian Fulcrums, for hydraulic, electrical and such. As for weapons systems, well... EDIT: with a link Edited December 17, 2012 by Robin_Hood 2nd French Fighter Squadron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iggsta3o5 Posted December 19, 2012 Share Posted December 19, 2012 Would love to see after the 29 a SU-30MK or even MKI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BraveBY Posted December 20, 2012 Share Posted December 20, 2012 There will always be sth to be expected, ha~ Looking fwd to this aircraft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evilducky Posted December 20, 2012 Share Posted December 20, 2012 You 2 didnt read through all of the thread. They cancelled this project. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
47box Posted December 21, 2012 Share Posted December 21, 2012 It´s amazing!!! This is wonderful. But have some points I would like to understand. There are some projects in development for DCS truly magnificent and I think even the level of realism expected. :thumbup: Today we have two simulators with spectacular levels of realism and they are: 1) A10C Warthog (although some implementations are still being missed .... ex.: IFF A10C Warthog among few other) 2) Black Shark As you mentioned this developing F15E, that really is spectacular since it follows the patterns of the aforementioned simulators. :joystick: I've been checking your post and now you mention aircraft for FSX that in my view is wonderful too (now flying the Superbug F18E - VRS) :thumbup:, and sure I'll be one of those who will buy it. What I see many aircraft are drawing attention in the Post which is very good, but lack direction for a specific project. What I mean is: Why rather than begin a new project does not finish first realistic simulator to proceed with other aircraft? I say this because I know the time needed for the project and at the same time understand the complexity of the project. Why not finish one before starting another? I see a post of this frustrate me to start with the launch of a F15E for DCS, not because of the quality of development that you guys have, but for many projects being mentioned and none exactly being finalized. :book: :cry: Anyway thank you for developments of aircraft and good luck. :thumbup::thumbup::thumbup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts