hein22 Posted June 3, 2020 Share Posted June 3, 2020 I tested this 7 times and it seems that if you fire SLAMs when IN RANGE cue appears and after a while, the accuracy is erratic. But¿ if you launch them IN RANGE but under 10nm the accuracy is 100% perfect. Track attached.accuracy range.trk Stay safe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hein22 Posted June 10, 2020 Author Share Posted June 10, 2020 This needs to be revised guys, it makes the weapon have a very consistent issue. Stay safe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VFA41_Lion Posted June 10, 2020 Share Posted June 10, 2020 SLAMs inertial navigation drifts a lot more than most weapons. It needs to be guided in via datalink if you want accuracy from standoff range. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hein22 Posted June 10, 2020 Author Share Posted June 10, 2020 SLAMs inertial navigation drifts a lot more than most weapons. It needs to be guided in via datalink if you want accuracy from standoff range. The consistency of the issue makes you think there is something going on here. Same result every time? Stay safe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hein22 Posted June 10, 2020 Author Share Posted June 10, 2020 SLAMs inertial navigation drifts a lot more than most weapons. It needs to be guided in via datalink if you want accuracy from standoff range. Wait! What? The SLAM has a GPS updating function for the INS, so what you stated isn't valid. Stay safe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VFA41_Lion Posted June 10, 2020 Share Posted June 10, 2020 https://www.ausairpower.net/TE-Harpoon.html from this article it seems like the GPS receiver was never used as good enough for a fire-and-forget to hit precision coordinates, and always used the datalink to guide it in for terminal phase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hein22 Posted June 10, 2020 Author Share Posted June 10, 2020 https://www.ausairpower.net/TE-Harpoon.html from this article it seems like the GPS receiver was never used as good enough for a fire-and-forget to hit precision coordinates, and always used the datalink to guide it in for terminal phase. It doesn't really say that, I read it full. But I see your point, although it seems more like trying to justify a bug rather than proving it wrong. I don't see any evidence that makes the DCS SLAM behave like it does. I think it should be looked at. Stay safe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hein22 Posted June 16, 2020 Author Share Posted June 16, 2020 Any word from ED? Bug is: if launched from more than aprox 10nm accuracy is perfect, if launched from more than that accuracy is very reduced. Stay safe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hein22 Posted June 16, 2020 Author Share Posted June 16, 2020 Correct as is. So the GPS is useless then? Come on ED. Can you at least write something here so we can learn if this is not a bug? It's quite rude to tag without saying anything. Stay safe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawk2495 Posted June 17, 2020 Share Posted June 17, 2020 I don't know. The documentation seemed pretty clear. The GPS is to correct for INS drift. And it's only accurate to within 50 ft. Which, from my testing, is about how far off it is when it misses. So, from what I've seen and read. It seems fairly correct. It's only job is to get the weapon on target in a manner that the pilot would only have to do a short search with the D/L to acquire the target. Now the SLAM-ER, on the other hand, can be used in fire and forget situations due to its ATA (Auto Target Acquisition) system. Which the SLAM doesn't have. I'm open to correction on that part. Why is the rum always gone!?!?!?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hein22 Posted June 17, 2020 Author Share Posted June 17, 2020 I don't know. The documentation seemed pretty clear. The GPS is to correct for INS drift. And it's only accurate to within 50 ft. Which, from my testing, is about how far off it is when it misses. So, from what I've seen and read. It seems fairly correct. It's only job is to get the weapon on target in a manner that the pilot would only have to do a short search with the D/L to acquire the target. Now the SLAM-ER, on the other hand, can be used in fire and forget situations due to its ATA (Auto Target Acquisition) system. Which the SLAM doesn't have. I'm open to correction on that part. What I'm seeing is much much more than 50ft. And if 50ft is what you see, then your statement comes down, because 50ft will give you fire and forget capabilities. Stay safe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED Team NineLine Posted June 17, 2020 ED Team Share Posted June 17, 2020 I watched the track from the OP, both in OB and in our dev build, it was not horrible in OB but was pretty deadly accurate in the dev build, so its possible it is still being tweaked slightly. Thanks guys. Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hein22 Posted June 17, 2020 Author Share Posted June 17, 2020 I watched the track from the OP, both in OB and in our dev build, it was not horrible in OB but was pretty deadly accurate in the dev build, so its possible it is still being tweaked slightly. Thanks guys. Thanks for the update. I'll continue to watch this closely and report back if I find something odd so we can see if it needs a tweak. Stay safe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hein22 Posted September 23, 2020 Author Share Posted September 23, 2020 I tested this 7 times and it seems that if you fire SLAMs when IN RANGE cue appears and after a while, the accuracy is erratic. But¿ if you launch them IN RANGE but under 10nm the accuracy is 100% perfect. Track attached. Any news guys? Stay safe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hein22 Posted September 23, 2020 Author Share Posted September 23, 2020 Nevermind, it is fixed after proper checking. Now the accuracy is the same no matter the distance (GPS magic). It can be good or not but it is consistent like it should be. thanks. Stay safe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solo_Turk Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 (edited) if slam should %100 accurate with gps ins, why weapon company put on a camera and datalink? i am asking to myself :) i think in dcs that datalink performance for long range is too bad. i dont know how that link performing real life Edited September 23, 2020 by Solo_Turk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts