ECM From Day 1? - Page 2 - ED Forums
 


Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-10-2019, 01:19 AM   #11
Wizard_03
Member
 
Wizard_03's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 760
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harlikwin View Post
I think the display info is to various degrees known for many of those systems. Especially older ones. For example the F15 ECM display is straight out of the book, at least for the older radars. For deception jamming you are mainly generating false contacts or confusing the radar into generating a false return, or multiple returns to obscure the actual contact. Of course ECCM techniques and signal processing play a role there as well and are largely "automagic" in terms of signal processing on modern aircraft anyway, basically the rardar computer realizes its getting hosed and then automatically selects the appropriate countermeasures, while giving you a heads up that you are getting jammed by jammer ABC. I mean both the APG-63/70 families and the APG73 were all built by Huges/Rayethon, so its not much of stretch to think the display symbology would be the same or "very similar", same thing from training commonality standpoint.

But the reality is EW warfare is a huge factor in what modern combat is. And saying, nah we won't model that, or can't doesn't really work for alot of people. So I think they will need to implement something that at least approximates it.

I think one solution that makes some senese is to build something like the two different grades of FM's and systems modeling. You have "basic ECM" and more advanced version when you have better data.
If they can do rudimentary IFF I would think semi-comprehensive ECM shouldn’t be that big of a deal other “games” have decent approximations of it.
__________________
DCS F/A-18C
Wizard_03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2019, 04:43 PM   #12
Harlikwin
Veteran
 
Harlikwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Living rent free in your mind
Posts: 4,015
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wizard_03 View Post
If they can do rudimentary IFF I would think semi-comprehensive ECM shouldn’t be that big of a deal other “games” have decent approximations of it.
Agreed. Various people have proposed some reasonable schemes for "easy" implementation of it. With a kind of list of what sorts of ECM each radar would be succeptible to, and what sorts of ECM various planes/pods were capable of putting out. And of course ECCM on top of that.
__________________
New hotness: I7 9700k 4.8ghz, 32gb ddr4, 2080ti, TM Warthog. TrackIR, HP Reverb (formermly CV1)
Old-N-busted: i7 4720HQ ~3.5GHZ, +32GB DDR3 + Nvidia GTX980m (4GB VRAM) TM Warthog. TrackIR, Rift CV1 (yes really).
Harlikwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2019, 06:24 PM   #13
zhukov032186
Senior Member
 
zhukov032186's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Fort Worth, Tx
Posts: 2,441
Default

Biggest problem with any ''realistic'' approximation of ECM is it will have to be integrated into each module individually, as well as how THAT module is affected by the various types of ECM.

Note that even now, with one crude system, some aircraft are affected/implemented differently based on the 3rd party. It's not going to be something that can be copy pasted into modules. It would directly involve both how DCS handles radar data and by extention RCS data ALL of which are currently extremely crude.

Reworking ECM means reworking the entire sensor ecosystem... which itself is ALSO variable by 3rd party (Heatblur is more complex than others, for example).

It isn't that I don't support it, but I think you guys aren't really grasping the magnitude, maybe even impossibility, of overhauling this huge aspect. It's more akin to graphic engine overhaul or Vulkan implementation, it's not going to be ''coding a single system that works automatically with all modules''. The game wasn't designed for any of this complex sensor stuff, there is no real framework there to build on, just everybody doing their own half baked ''simplifications''.

I.e. it's more like a feature that would be presented as DCS 3.0 or 4.0 (assuming Vulkan warrants 3.0 when it launches)
__________________
Zhukov attacks *FORUM USER* with Legendary Trollsword!
*FORUM USER* Constitution save roll.... Fail!
*FORUM USER* afflicted with ''Hurt Feelz'', -1 Concentration for two rounds
zhukov032186 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2019, 08:00 PM   #14
Harlikwin
Veteran
 
Harlikwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Living rent free in your mind
Posts: 4,015
Default

I don't disagree. I just think it should be a major core engine priority moving forward.
__________________
New hotness: I7 9700k 4.8ghz, 32gb ddr4, 2080ti, TM Warthog. TrackIR, HP Reverb (formermly CV1)
Old-N-busted: i7 4720HQ ~3.5GHZ, +32GB DDR3 + Nvidia GTX980m (4GB VRAM) TM Warthog. TrackIR, Rift CV1 (yes really).
Harlikwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2019, 08:05 PM   #15
Wizard_03
Member
 
Wizard_03's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 760
Default

Yes it’s a huge part of modern air warfare. As fundamental as countermeasures and data links, IMO.
__________________
DCS F/A-18C
Wizard_03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2019, 08:09 PM   #16
Exorcet
Senior Member
 
Exorcet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,729
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zhukov032186 View Post
... I.e. it's more like a feature that would be presented as DCS 3.0 or 4.0 (assuming Vulkan warrants 3.0 when it launches)
Your post makes a lot of sense, though for me one of the biggest and hopefully simple things that could be done is to not model SPJ's as noise jammers. The fixed it for the AI by adding the "ECM only when locked" option, but players still give themselves away when turning on ECM and have to wait 15 seconds to do it.
__________________
http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk187/Exorcet/F-15singaturebaseACOmodifiedcomp-1.jpg
Win 7 64 i5-6600K 3.6 GHz 32 GB RAM GTX970 4GB -- A-10C, F-5E, Su-27, F-15C missions in User Files
Exorcet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2019, 08:11 PM   #17
TacoGrease
Member
 
TacoGrease's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 177
Default

This. As others have said, even an approximation is key given the importance of ECM in modern day.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harlikwin View Post
I don't disagree. I just think it should be a major core engine priority moving forward.
__________________
2080Ti FTW3 Ultra - G.Skill RJ 32GB (16x2) DDR4 3200 - Ryzen 2700X 4.2Ghz OC - Corsair H100i Pro - Samsung 970 EVO M.2 2TB - TMW HOTAS w Delta Sim - F/A-18C grip - 10cm Sahaj - TrackIR 5 Pro - Rift CV1 - MFG CWind - BuddyFox UFC - DSD RK II - Cougar MFDs w/ LCDs - Foxx Mounts - VPC MongoosT-50CM base

- Maps: NTTR, Persian Gulf, Normandy
- Modules: FC3, F-14A/B, F/A-18C, AV-8B, A-10C, F-16C, F-86, KA-50, P-51D, WWII assets, and [insert campaign name]
Dreaming of the F-15E / F-14D / Rhino
TacoGrease is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:16 AM. vBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys. Powered by vBulletin®.
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.