|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#781 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 62
|
![]() Quote:
https://youtu.be/Obh_3p23u0A https://youtu.be/ZfdLjk4XkmE ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#782 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 318
|
![]()
An A6 with a Vietnam map would rock
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#783 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 1,291
|
![]()
An A-6 with no map would also be fun
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#784 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1,676
|
![]()
And A-6 would be awesome, but if it is a post-Vietnam version in my opinion.
I'd like A-6E TRAM or SWIP instead of how it was in 'Nam. It would also work very well with 70s to 90s modules that are getting more and more diverse in DCS.
__________________
Modules: MiG-21Bis, Fw-190D, Bf-109K, P-51D, F-86F, Ka-50, UH-1H, Mi-8MTV2, Hawk T1A, C-101, FC3, A-10C, CA, Mirage 2000C, Gazelle, L-39, MiG-15Bis, F-5E, AJS 37 Viggen, Yak-52, Christen Eagle II Honorable Mention Mods: Community A-4E and MB-339 mods Wishlist: MiG-23, MiG-27, Jaguar, Su-24M2, F-111, A-6E, A-7E&D, Ju-88A4, Ju-87G2&D5,F-4E,Mirage F-1, Mi-28N, Extra 300,J-7,MiG-25, Battle of Britain era British and German aircraft, A6M5 Zero, Fw-190F8, Super Tucano,Su-17. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#785 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 66
|
![]()
Aside from the A-6 and F-14D, I'd love to see Heatblur apply its expertise to an Eastern Bloc aircraft like the MiG-25PD or the MiG-27K eventually.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#786 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,268
|
![]()
Guys what's up with the A-6
![]() ![]()
__________________
F/A-18, F-14, M-2000C, A-10C, AV-8B, AJS-37 Viggen, F-5E-3, F-86F, MiG-21bis, MiG-15bis, L-39 Albatros, C-101 Aviojet, P-51D, Spitfire LF Mk. IX, Bf 109 4-K, UH-1H, Mi-8, Ka-50, NTTR, Normandy, Persian Gulf... and not enough time to fully enjoy it all |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#787 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: North Carolina, USA
Posts: 38
|
![]()
Personally I'd like the A-6 for two reasons: It's the perfect partner for the f-14 when setting up large scale multi-unit missions, and with the detailed carrier module coming up I want as many carrier capable aircraft as possible.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#788 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Croatia / Lebanon
Posts: 2,167
|
![]() Quote:
On a more serious note, on its own merits, I'd prefer a Tornado over the A-6E by far (a consequence of playing DI's sim a lot), but I have to agree that it would be nicer to have the A-6E (and A-7E) simulated along with the Tomcat as soon as possible with the carriers and crews and what not. There is the Hornet, but it kind of sticks out with being overly digital and its multi-role capabilities. The A-6E being defenseless makes for a better mix with the Tomcat.
__________________
i386DX40@42 MHz w/i387 CP, 4 MB RAM (8*512 kB), Trident 8900C 1 MB w/16-bit RAMDAC ISA, Quantum 340 MB UDMA33, SB 16, DOS 6.22 w/QEMM + Win3.11CE, Quickshot 1 btn 2 axis gameport joystick, Numpad as hat. 2 FPH on a good day, 1 FPH avg. DISCLAIMER: My posts are absolutely useless. Just passing time till DCS: F-14.. Annoyed by my posts? Please consider donating. Once the target sum is reached, I'll be off to somewhere nice I promise not to post from. I'd buy that for a dollar! Last edited by Dudikoff; 02-10-2019 at 09:58 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#789 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 185
|
![]()
I think it's safe to say that if they were to model the Intruder, then it's almost a foregone conclusion that it would be post Vietnam in order for it to fit in with the era of their F-14(s).
__________________
"Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth." |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#790 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 760
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|