J-11A Discussion - Page 10 - ED Forums
 


Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-08-2018, 05:32 PM   #91
Satarosa
Member
 
Satarosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 181
Default

Done lol
Satarosa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2018, 02:22 AM   #92
Wizard_03
Member
 
Wizard_03's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 380
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Satarosa View Post
Could you upgrade the radar range like the real one?


J-11A ( 1998 )


N001VE "Panda Project"



Range*: ~ 120km
Azimut scan: -60°/+60° <120°
Elevation scan : -55°/+55° <110°

*Effective detection range in the best conditions on a fighter (HOT)
What’s your source on the ranges??
__________________
DCS F/A-18C
Wizard_03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2018, 05:33 PM   #93
Satarosa
Member
 
Satarosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 181
Post

There is more than hundred..

some:

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/radar...s.94948/page-9
(look chinese link)

http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Flanker-Radars.html


https://51escadrongriffon.com/index....avions-jouable


https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E8%8B%...A4%A9%E7%BA%BF

Last edited by Satarosa; 11-09-2018 at 05:37 PM.
Satarosa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2018, 05:02 PM   #94
Satarosa
Member
 
Satarosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 181
Default

Did you know?
Satarosa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2018, 10:52 PM   #95
Wizard_03
Member
 
Wizard_03's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 380
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Satarosa View Post
Did you know?
No I don’t, because modern radar performance data is controlled. So what we have in the sim is just a representation.

My point being ED has access to the same public sources you listed, as well as non-public sources, Like SMEs for example. So with that in mind they have tuned the in game radar performance.

I seriously doubt they’re gonna change anything without actual technical documentation to reference or first hand knowledge.
__________________
DCS F/A-18C
Wizard_03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2018, 01:11 PM   #96
Satarosa
Member
 
Satarosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 181
Post Data

Being myself military and without pretensions exaggerated, expert in a lot of field, I can say that in general what is classified is not the performance, but the materials used and system of operation and software.
As I explained the documentation on the performance of this radar on the Russian and Chinese websites is very complete, no need to be part of the zone 51 to have access to the maximum detection values. (on a "fighter" 4m2)

It is a simulation game so according to the information available to the public it would be nice to increase a little radar detection range N001VE of the J-11A to match the reality.
Satarosa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2018, 04:11 PM   #97
Wizard_03
Member
 
Wizard_03's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 380
Default

To have them change anything you need to prove to the Devs why it should be changed. ED doesn’t really like guessing.

So if you have some special knowledge or documentation that we are all not privileged with go ahead and PM them. They’ll absolutely improve the sim. But they are absolutely not going to take ausairpowers word for it.

They need 100 percent creditable sources, the publically available information is usually not reliable. Especially when we’re talking performance and capability.
__________________
DCS F/A-18C

Last edited by Wizard_03; 11-13-2018 at 04:16 PM.
Wizard_03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2018, 05:42 PM   #98
Satarosa
Member
 
Satarosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 181
Default

You know if we analyze each module of DCS WORLD well we realize that a lot of freedom and simplification have been taken from the developer, so I do not agree with the fact that the documentation must be submitted by a senior member of the army specialized in this specific sector, with official mention and stamps.

I try to improve the game and the experience of a real simulation to give values that are controlled and findable on the Internet by public.

I invite people and developers to do more research to improve the gaming experience and to have a more advanced simulation.

most copy-paste and simplify systems have been done simply for ease of development not for lack of documentation, we must make the nuance with that!
Satarosa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2018, 08:04 PM   #99
uboats
ED Tester / ED Moderator
 
uboats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: East Sierra
Posts: 5,348
Default

sorry for the late update,
thanks for the info.
N001VE should be able to attack two at same time.
But AFAIK, negative for j-11a.
from online resources, confirmed is that 001VE installed on PLAAF Su-30, but not sure for j-11a
j-11a has several upgrades, so we may use early-mid term upgrade as reference with new MFD and R-77 compatibility. We will also modify DL a bit.

If you have more info from solid source, we would like to consider modify the performance.
__________________
东风夜放花千树,更吹落,星如雨


My DCS Mods, Skins, Utilities and Scripts

| Windows 10 | i7-4790K | GTX 980Ti Hybrid | 32GB RAM | 2TB SSD + 1TB HDD |
| TM Warthog Stick | CH Pro Throttle + Pro Pedal | TIR5 Pro | TM MFD Cougar | Gun Camera: PrtScn |
uboats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2018, 10:54 PM   #100
Satarosa
Member
 
Satarosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 181
Default

Nin Hao uboats




SU-27 ( 1985 ) using a N001 "Myech", with *Dect Range: ~ 110km, Azi scan: -60°/+60° <120° Elev sacn:-60°/+60° <120°


J-11A ( 1998 ) using a N001VE "Panda Project", with *Dect Range: ~ 120km, Azi scan: -60°/+60° <120° Elev sacn:-55°/+55° <110°



* The maximum detection of the radars is here calculated on the surface of an F-15C (4 m²) coming "HOT", in the best optimum conditions for the use of the radar)


So we find that in reality there are two different radars.. Unfortunately INGAME currently we have the values of the Sukhoi 27 radar !


The radar of J-11A is clearly superior to the radar of SU-27!


Check this:

https://books.google.be/books?id=Kt2...N001VE&f=false


https://www.aviationsmilitaires.net/...Model/628.html

" 第一个中文版J-11A有一个N001VE雷达,可以同时接合2个目标。 它有4个多功能显示器,显然是头盔取景器。 第一架J-11飞机达到了这个标准。"

https://ruslet.webnode.cz/technika/c...j-11-flanker-/

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shenyang_J-11


....





You will see that all the sources in internet will tell you that the J-11A has N001VE "Panda Project"

Sources are often of different languages use the translator of your choice..


Xie Xie
Satarosa is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:22 AM. vBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys. Powered by vBulletin®.
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.