S77th-GOYA Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 Which would you prefer to see ED develop for DCS first? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S77th-konkussion Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 F18 for sure- but only if it can be done a lot better than the F15 was- realism wise. If not- I'll take an accurate Falcon. [sIGPIC]http://forums.eagle.ru/attachment.php?attachmentid=43337&d=1287169113[/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geier Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 Su25;) But among the fighters I wish Mig29A 9-12 first F16 goes after;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poncho Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 F/A 18 for sure. But if they can better model the F 16 then I would also be satisfied! Cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FWT Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 F/A-18 for me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boberro Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 I prefer F-16 than F-18 in first addon after Ka-50 and Apache... F-16 is similar to me and it is live legend :D After A-10 and Su-39. Off course well modelled, not like we have now. Unrealisti so much eeh... Reminder: Fighter pilots make movies. Bomber pilots make... HISTORY! :D | Also to be remembered: FRENCH TANKS HAVE ONE GEAR FORWARD AND FIVE BACKWARD :D ಠ_ಠ ツ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thereminqblank Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 I would dig either, both would be fun to fly! "Unholy Roller" [sIGPIC]http://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/images/userbars/A-10C_UserBar_01.gif[/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flаnker Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 Su-33 Мои авиафото Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Force_Feedback Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 Su-33KUB ;) TVC, uprated engines (13500/14500kgf), bigger flaps, advanced missiles, and K-36 seats to inspect from up close. -Cons:Semi-classified cockpit (prototype cockpit is not, but it lacks all the MFDs and such) Creedence Clearwater Revival:worthy: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monotwix Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 F-18 and advanced carrier. I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kula66 Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 Until they fix the missiles its a moot point ... it doesn't matter what you fly! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EricJ Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 F/A-18. The model is pretty much complete, and more than likely, the coding was either started or worked on before Ubisoft said "no". While the F-16 itself isn't shabby, it'd take longer than the F/A-18 anyways. LOMAC Section| | Gaming Resume (PDF) | Gallery | Flanker2.51 Storage Site | Also known as Flanker562 back in the day... Steam ID EricJ562 | DCS: A-10A/C Pilot | DCS: Su-25T Pilot | Texture Artist "...parade ground soldiers always felt that way (contempt) about killers in uniform." -Counting The Cost, Hammer's Slammers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S77th-GOYA Posted October 29, 2007 Author Share Posted October 29, 2007 ... before Ubisoft said "no". To what did Ubi say "no"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeroscout Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 To what did Ubi say "no"? The F/A-18 I want the F/A-18. Everything the F-16 can do, and more. We don't need another Falcon 4.0. DCS Wishlist: 1) FIX THE DAMN RIVERS!!! 2) Spherical or cylindrical panorama view projection. 3) Enhanced input options (action upon button release, etc). 4) Aircraft flight parameter dump upon exit (stick posn, attitude, rates, accel, control volume, control-surface positions, SAS bias, etc). 5) ADS-33 maneuver courses as static objects. 6) Exposed API or exports of trim position and stick force for custom controllers. 7) Select auto multiple audio devices Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X_Man Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 they did? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeroscout Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 they did? That's my understanding. Some one PLEASE correct me if I'm wrong. DCS Wishlist: 1) FIX THE DAMN RIVERS!!! 2) Spherical or cylindrical panorama view projection. 3) Enhanced input options (action upon button release, etc). 4) Aircraft flight parameter dump upon exit (stick posn, attitude, rates, accel, control volume, control-surface positions, SAS bias, etc). 5) ADS-33 maneuver courses as static objects. 6) Exposed API or exports of trim position and stick force for custom controllers. 7) Select auto multiple audio devices Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FaithMan Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 F/A-18 ! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 70th Blue Lions -> Recruitment open . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S77th-GOYA Posted October 29, 2007 Author Share Posted October 29, 2007 Aeroscout, what are you basing your understanding on? I don't think it has every been made public exactly what Ubi told ED regarding the release of LOMAC. I would guess it was simply that ED had run out of dev time and they must deliver the product by a certain date. That would certainly explain the state of LOMAC 1.00. It would also explain at least part of ED's wish to cut ties with Ubi. So that they could run on their own schedule and never be forced to release an unfinished product. But as I said, it has never been made public information and it probably never will. We are left to fill in the blanks as best as we can. But I do seem to remember the above events discussed on the old Ubi forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S77th-GOYA Posted October 29, 2007 Author Share Posted October 29, 2007 Until they fix the missiles its a moot point ... it doesn't matter what you fly! There are no broken missiles in DCS. :smartass: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Crazy_Eyes Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 Viper please I was never a fan of Falcon 4.0 but I'd love to see an AFM Viper with multirole capabilities, IFF, 6DOF, clickable cockpit, HMS, NV and datalink. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeroscout Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 Aeroscout, what are you basing your understanding on? I don't think it has every been made public exactly what Ubi told ED regarding the release of LOMAC. I would guess it was simply that ED had run out of dev time and they must deliver the product by a certain date. That would certainly explain the state of LOMAC 1.00. It would also explain at least part of ED's wish to cut ties with Ubi. So that they could run on their own schedule and never be forced to release an unfinished product. But as I said, it has never been made public information and it probably never will. We are left to fill in the blanks as best as we can. But I do seem to remember the above events discussed on the old Ubi forum. so are you saying I'm right or wrong? As for what i'm basing my understanding on is what EricJ said and others. (such as the ubi forums and a few rumors here.) Sorry if i pissed you off. DCS Wishlist: 1) FIX THE DAMN RIVERS!!! 2) Spherical or cylindrical panorama view projection. 3) Enhanced input options (action upon button release, etc). 4) Aircraft flight parameter dump upon exit (stick posn, attitude, rates, accel, control volume, control-surface positions, SAS bias, etc). 5) ADS-33 maneuver courses as static objects. 6) Exposed API or exports of trim position and stick force for custom controllers. 7) Select auto multiple audio devices Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S77th-GOYA Posted October 29, 2007 Author Share Posted October 29, 2007 Sorry if i pissed you off. What in the world made you think you pissed me off? :thumbup: It's cool, brother. (Maybe I should type lighter) :D And I'm not telling you you were right or wrong because when it comes down to it, we don't really know what Ubi told ED. But it doesn't make much sense for Ubi to tell ED to specifically leave out the Hornet. But in telling ED that the product must be delivered by a certain date, that may have been the result. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HungaroJET Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 F-18 and advanced carrier. F-18C/D + advanced carrier = Carrier OPS :thumbup: ...catapult steam effect, moving elevators, crew services :thumbup: Atop the midnight tarmac, a metal beast awaits. To be flown below the radar, to bring the enemy his fate. HAVE A BANDIT DAY ! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] "When I'm working on a problem, I never think about beauty. I think only how to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong." - R. Buckminster Fuller (1895 - 1983), American Architect, Author, Designer, Inventor, and Futurist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frostie Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 Viper please I was never a fan of Falcon 4.0 but I'd love to see an AFM Viper with multirole capabilities, IFF, 6DOF, clickable cockpit, HMS, NV and datalink. Yep, and a nice fully clickable cockpit without the 2d TIR-headache flick, such a realism killer. Though a Hornet for carrier ops would be nice too. I'll fence this one. "[51☭] FROSTIE" #55 51st PVO "BISONS" Fastest MiG pilot in the world - TCR'10 https://100kiap.org Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TorwaK Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 no doubt... F-16. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Intel Core i7-6700K, @5GHz | Asus Maximus Hero VIII | 2 x eVGA GTX 970 SLI | Kingston Predator 16GB DDR4-3000Mhz | 2 x Samsung 850 PRO 240GB RAID-0 | AOC G2460PG G-SYNC LCD | OCULUS RIFT CV1 VR | THRUSTMASTER HOTAS WARTHOG | CH PRO PEDALS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts