Scrape Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 A-6 "It's amazing, even at the Formula 1 level how many drivers still think the brakes are for slowing the car down." VF-2 Bounty Hunters [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Virtual Carrier Strike Group 1 | Discord Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunslinger22 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 We need to be realistic, we're not going to get a Russian fighter that is post 70's. Razbam already tried with there MiG-23, but ED didn't give them the green light. I would love to see more Redfor aircraft, but it's just not going to happen. That said I think the Intruder would be perfect, that way we would have a perfect 1990's CVW. "I'm just a dude, playing a dude, disguised as another dude." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carss Posted May 30, 2018 Author Share Posted May 30, 2018 We need to be realistic, we're not going to get a Russian fighter that is post 70's. Razbam already tried with there MiG-23, but ED didn't give them the green light. I would love to see more Redfor aircraft, but it's just not going to happen. That said I think the Intruder would be perfect, that way we would have a perfect 1990's CVW. Well there is the upcoming JF-17 which is a proper 4th gen Chinese plane which is perfect for redfor. So if not Russian then maybe we can make do with Chinese or some other. As for Russian planes, I think the best bet would be other FC level aircraft [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Planes: FC3, P-51, F-86, F-5E, Mirage 2000, F/A-18, F-14, F-16, Mig-19P :joystick: ED pls gib A-4 and F-4 :cry: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLTeo Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 This little bandit would be ideal for DCS. I always thought the 51st's Stormo logo was the coolest in the Air Force! We need to be realistic, we're not going to get a Russian fighter that is post 70's. Razbam already tried with there MiG-23, but ED didn't give them the green light. I would love to see more Redfor aircraft, but it's just not going to happen. That said I think the Intruder would be perfect, that way we would have a perfect 1990's CVW. If I recall correctly, they said that Razbam's Mig-23 would "interfere with existing plans", not that they could never get the proper information or whatever. I agree we likely aren't going to get a 2005 Flanker/Fulcrum like with the Hornet, but that doesn't mean they can't add anything remotely modern (like an export Mig-23MLD to name one). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devil 505 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 Ashame we can not get a hold of this beast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F900EX Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 Tornado with ATF :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carss Posted May 30, 2018 Author Share Posted May 30, 2018 The Mig-25 possibly could happen since it's old and long gone. The Mig-31 definitely not [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Planes: FC3, P-51, F-86, F-5E, Mirage 2000, F/A-18, F-14, F-16, Mig-19P :joystick: ED pls gib A-4 and F-4 :cry: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tobaschi Posted May 31, 2018 Share Posted May 31, 2018 So since the Tomcat is going full steam ahead, just out of curiosity, been wondering what could be next in the pipeline for DCS by Heatblur? Personally I just hope it's a century series fighter, or a straight wing jet like the F-80 or Dassault Ouragan. Anyhow was just curious, as have always been after the Tomcat is before the bugfix. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pegg00 Posted August 12, 2018 Share Posted August 12, 2018 Im confused, this post says the F-14 is fully expected to be released in 2017 and that 2018 is the “year of improvements”... what happened? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F900EX Posted August 12, 2018 Share Posted August 12, 2018 Im confused, this post says the F-14 is fully expected to be released in 2017 and that 2018 is the “year of improvements”... what happened? In the world + Devs in DCS, there is lots of talk, then there is the reality that the talk was just that ... I think the only aircraft that was released on time was the F/A-18 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomCatMucDe Posted August 13, 2018 Share Posted August 13, 2018 We're working on another complex jet which will make good use of our own technologies. We're also looking at expanding the F-14 product, but will look more closely at what exactly that means after release. That said, 2018 will be mostly the year of improvements to both the F-14 and Viggen. We don't want to be stuck in the eternal Beta rut. if 2018 will be the year of releasing (not improvement) the F14, it would be good enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skitter Posted August 15, 2018 Share Posted August 15, 2018 Well, at least they don't release unfinished aircrafts like Razbam does. Fair play to Heatblur Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuiGon Posted August 15, 2018 Share Posted August 15, 2018 Im confused, this post says the F-14 is fully expected to be released in 2017 and that 2018 is the “year of improvements”... what happened? Well, guess what: Delay is what happened Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71st_AH Rob Posted August 15, 2018 Share Posted August 15, 2018 Well, at least they don't release unfinished aircrafts like Razbam does. Fair play to Heatblur What, you mean like the Viggen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuiGon Posted August 15, 2018 Share Posted August 15, 2018 What, you mean like the Viggen? The Viggen was pretty much feature complete upon Early Access release, unlike RAZBAMs modules. Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donut Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 It looks like the "after the Tomcat" might be the A-6E if everything works out. i5 7600K @4.8GHz | 1080 Ti | 32GB 3200MHz | SSD | DCS SETTINGS | "COCKPIT" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carss Posted September 2, 2018 Author Share Posted September 2, 2018 It looks like the "after the Tomcat" might be the A-6E if everything works out. Hoping they get the license that is [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Planes: FC3, P-51, F-86, F-5E, Mirage 2000, F/A-18, F-14, F-16, Mig-19P :joystick: ED pls gib A-4 and F-4 :cry: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unknown Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 Hoping they get the license that is +1 :joystick: Modules: KA-50, A-10C, FC3, UH-1H, MI-8MTV2, CA, MIG-21bis, FW-190D9, Bf-109K4, F-86F, MIG-15bis, M-2000C, SA342 Gazelle, AJS-37 Viggen, F/A-18C, F-14, C-101, FW-190A8, F-16C, F-5E, JF-17, SC, Mi-24P Hind, AH-64D Apache, Mirage F1 System: Win 11 Pro 64bit, Ryzen 3800X, 32gb RAM DDR4-3200, PowerColor Radeon RX 6900XT Red Devil ,1 x Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB NVMe, 2 x Samsung SSD 2TB + 1TB SATA, MFG Crosswind Rudder Pedals - VIRPIL T-50CM and VIRPIL MongoosT-50 Throttle - HP Reverg G2, using only the latest Open Beta, DCS settings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baco Posted September 17, 2018 Share Posted September 17, 2018 In the world + Devs in DCS, there is lots of talk, then there is the reality that the talk was just that ... I think the only aircraft that was released on time was the F/A-18 You mean Half Baked, fully Bugged, but hey on time LOL.... Heatblur could do the same and release the Cat with only AIM 9ers, no radar, no IFF, no ECM or EWR LOL just a nice airframe and engines to fly arround ;)..oh and the gun of course but no piper ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wfg.Reaper Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 (edited) A-6 Intruder hmmm could be cool but.. with the new code and such that Heatblur has shown they can do (AI) why not shoot for the EA-18G Growler. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_EA-18G_Growler Edited September 18, 2018 by wfg.Reaper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carss Posted September 18, 2018 Author Share Posted September 18, 2018 A-6 Intruder hmmm could be cool but.. with the new code and such that Heatblur has shown they can do (AI) why not shoot for the EA-18G Growler. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_EA-18G_Growler E/A-18G maybe way too advanced. Why not the F-111 and the EF-111 instead? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Planes: FC3, P-51, F-86, F-5E, Mirage 2000, F/A-18, F-14, F-16, Mig-19P :joystick: ED pls gib A-4 and F-4 :cry: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bC3660 Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 E/A-18G maybe way too advanced. Why not the F-111 and the EF-111 instead? Because there not naval aircraft.:smilewink::thumbup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jojyrocks Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 A-6 Intruder hmmm could be cool but.. with the new code and such that Heatblur has shown they can do (AI) why not shoot for the EA-18G Growler. Its too advanced and its only recently they fully replaced the EA6. EA -18G would not make sense since ECM modeling in DCS is not that developed and one cannot truly replicate an ECM, espcially is sim. It makes more sense to develop an F-18E/F than EA-18G growler. When compared, Only the base superhornet has more marketable features over the growler...which is basically a superhornet modded ONLY for ECM and SEAD ops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jojyrocks Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 A-6 Intruder hmmm could be cool but.. with the new code and such that Heatblur has shown they can do (AI) why not shoot for the EA-18G Growler. Its too advanced and its only recently they fully replaced the EA6. EA -18G would not make sense since ECM modeling in DCS is not that developed and one cannot truly replicate an ECM, especially is sim. It makes more sense to develop an F-18E/F than EA-18G growler. When compared, Only the base superhornet has more marketable features over the growler...which is basically a superhornet modded ONLY for ECM and SEAD ops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jojyrocks Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 The more Marketable module would be the A7. It can do almost all the A6 can do and its got an inbuilt gun...plus better HUD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts