Battery not simulated - Page 6 - ED Forums
 


Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-13-2018, 02:06 PM   #51
Brixmis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: On An Island
Posts: 1,662
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vladinsky View Post
In the end it's just different developers having different modeling standards. Some simulate the bare minimum and some go into ridiculous almost worrying detail.
I wish people would stop insulting developers - especially when they have no idea of how the module was made, what was available, what limitations are imposed, how much coding it involves - how big the team is - whatever.

Unhappy? Do a better job or fly something else. Maybe you should have done more research before you bought it? Could have asked and someone was bound to check and tell you.

And of course all these people who complain are also perfect at their own jobs (if they have one). Enough - either ask in a polite way if there is any chance this can be modelled, which is highly unlikely at this stage, but you never know - or just put up with it or fly something else.

Thread unsubbed.
__________________
Pictorial Guides
Brixmis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2018, 02:31 PM   #52
FSKRipper
Member
 
FSKRipper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Germany / Greifswald
Posts: 919
Default

+1

Time to close this growing mountain of sh**. The question was answered on page 1.
__________________
i7 4790K @ 4,8GHz | 1080GTX | 16GB RAM | 256GB & 750 GB Samsung SSD | TIR5 w/ Track Clip | Warthog HOTAS+extension+Wheel Stand Pro | Saitek Combat Rudder pedals | Gametrix 908 Jetseat
FSKRipper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2018, 02:53 PM   #53
Vladinsky
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 308
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brixmis View Post
I wish people would stop insulting developers - especially when they have no idea of how the module was made, what was available, what limitations are imposed, how much coding it involves - how big the team is - whatever.
Not sure why you quoted me but I agree(english second language?), some seem to jump straight to insults which is never acceptable and not conducive to any progress.
Vladinsky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2018, 04:42 PM   #54
iFoxRomeo
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 392
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schmirco View Post
A simple question, isn't the battery simulated?

I am switching on the battery, waiting 10min and nothing happens, no electrical power loss, no movements on voltmeter, nothing.

Not simulated, bug or my fault?
Not a bug, a feature.... oh, that was a different software.
Some people seem to be thin-skinned... Why is there a need to point to other modules for a simple question.

Maybe this helps to cool down.

General emergency procedures:




And IFR equipped version:



So for the duration of a flight, the battery should have enough juice.
But I don't think it would be rocket science to implement battery life. As there is comparison to other modules: There are modules, that have battery life simulated. For me, that's just another part of the whole picture about the Gazelle.

Fox

p.s. Schmirco thx, this threat made me look at the Gazelle's flightmanual more closely.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	C608C34D-2087-4902-AF85-6358A7546D3B.jpeg
Views:	103
Size:	281.5 KB
ID:	191981   Click image for larger version

Name:	993BEFB6-A6BB-43DD-88EC-7D6845D0487C.jpeg
Views:	103
Size:	382.4 KB
ID:	191982  
iFoxRomeo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2018, 05:11 PM   #55
Schmirco
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,540
Default

Thx for the Docs!
__________________

www.vtasg.de
Schmirco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2018, 06:56 PM   #56
dimitriov
Member
 
dimitriov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 636
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brixmis View Post
I wish people would stop insulting developers - especially when they have no idea of how the module was made, what was available, what limitations are imposed, how much coding it involves - how big the team is - whatever.

Unhappy? Do a better job or fly something else. Maybe you should have done more research before you bought it? Could have asked and someone was bound to check and tell you.

And of course all these people who complain are also perfect at their own jobs (if they have one). Enough - either ask in a polite way if there is any chance this can be modelled, which is highly unlikely at this stage, but you never know - or just put up with it or fly something else.

Thread unsubbed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FSKRipper View Post
+1

Time to close this growing mountain of sh**. The question was answered on page 1.

The average ED yeller is able to create a 6 pages thread questioning how the **** it's possible that battery voltage wasn't implemented on a module. What would you expect after this. People are trolling and when someone tells them, they are the troll. Simply leave the thread and cease reading it, there is no hope left here.
dimitriov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2018, 09:18 PM   #57
Flagrum
Veteran
 
Flagrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: 32U MC0539
Posts: 5,977
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dimitriov View Post
The average ED yeller is able to create a 6 pages thread questioning how the **** it's possible that battery voltage wasn't implemented on a module. What would you expect after this. People are trolling and when someone tells them, they are the troll. Simply leave the thread and cease reading it, there is no hope left here.
dimitriov, just stop talking bullshit and telling lies.

On the first page there was no definitive answer to the OP's question. Then you and others tried to make fun of his question and started to troll the thread with your incoherent talking about door hinges. Trying to ridicule the topic by ignoring the fact that this kind of systems modelling is actually is not uncommon with other modules didn't help to keep the thread objective.

Just stop playing the victim here and stop insulting people as "ED yellers" when they are simply asking not unreasonable questions.

tl;dr: don't be an asshole, dimitriov!
__________________
DCS - Digital Combat Simulator
"Don't get yourselves too excited" *


Flagrum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2018, 08:55 AM   #58
Eviscerador
Junior Member
 
Eviscerador's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Gijón, Spain
Posts: 93
Default

I guess next time a dev should have just said:

"Battery is not modelled because according to Gazelle manual both batteries have enough juice to complete a night flight even if the generator fails in flight, and we considered that it wasn't needed to model battery consumption"

We could have spared 6 pages of nonsense.
__________________
Eviscerador is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2018, 12:05 PM   #59
Schmirco
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,540
Default

True
__________________

www.vtasg.de
Schmirco is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:21 PM. vBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys. Powered by vBulletin®.
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.