ED Team NineLine Posted July 25, 2017 ED Team Share Posted July 25, 2017 Perhaps some of the 'no' votes have a vested interest in not seeing their usual combat simulation opponents being given the opportunity to be more lethal, LOL. Also, perhaps some 'don't care' voters don't understand the potential and historical accuracy in terms of practiced and experienced pilot combat. Happy landings, Historical accuracy seems to be in the eye of the beholder in this thread though... even of you give the Yes votes the I dont car numbers, its still a really small number. DM will do a millions times more for air combat than this ever will. Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Art-J Posted July 25, 2017 Share Posted July 25, 2017 I like Spit's ~250 yds for A-A engagement. But I also much prefer Mustang's ~300+ yds for A-G job. Wouldn't mind having two options selectable in mission editor as a compromise! i7 9700K @ stock speed, single GTX1070, 32 gigs of RAM, TH Warthog, MFG Crosswind, Win10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED Team NineLine Posted July 25, 2017 ED Team Share Posted July 25, 2017 I like Spit's ~250 yds for A-A engagement. But I also much prefer Mustang's ~300+ yds for A-G job. Wouldn't mind having two options selectable in mission editor as a compromise! Again, that is all I could see being done, maybe not so much for the Spit, but for the P-51D, an A2G mission setting and an A2A setting in the ME. I do believe though that what the P-51D has right now is a could setting for all missions, could it be better for A2A? Maybe... but it doesnt bother me at all. Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoW Reddog Posted July 25, 2017 Share Posted July 25, 2017 I voted don't care as I don't own the Mustang. However if it's to set a precedent for the aircraft that I do own then please change my vote to Yes. Also, the premise of this thread was not to prioritise Dev work over anything else. That right there is a straw man. It is a simple yes no on the merit of the proposal itself. With due respect. You are a moderator. Apply the rules of the forum by all means, but you are not the official spokesperson, nor the final arbiter of right or wrong. Please don't blur the lines.You have an opinion. The same as the rest of us. That's all. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED Team NineLine Posted July 25, 2017 ED Team Share Posted July 25, 2017 With due respect. You are a moderator. Apply the rules of the forum by all means, but you are not the official spokesperson, nor the final arbiter of right or wrong. Please don't blur the lines.You have an opinion. The same as the rest of us. That's all. Actually besides being slightly rude, its totally wrong. If you were to ask Yo-Yo or Wags about this, its a non-issue, its already been decided to not change what they have now. I am willing to listen to what you guys are saying, and if there is enough there, I would go to bat and try and help fight to get something changed or added, I have done it on other things. So yeah, right now on this issue, I am the only one still listening, ED has made up their mind on this. I have not been convinced yet that it needs to be changed, and I am not really seeing anything to motivate me to try and change ED's mind on this... Your change in vote takes it from 36 to 37.... to put that in perspective there was over 2000 people involved in the DCS kickstarter... I am sure there is even more people here beyond that... 37 votes to get this feature added isnt enough. SO with that, I think I am going to personally stick a fork in this issue. Feel free to carry on discussing if you like. That's all. Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts