JF-17 Thunder Discussions - Page 42 - ED Forums
 


Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-04-2019, 10:10 PM   #411
AeriaGloria
Senior Member
 
AeriaGloria's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: LA
Posts: 1,102
Default

It is not like link 16 and a SA page, I believe it is only for controlling the 802 man in the loop missile
EDIT:Stand corrected looking at load out in update thread it looks like SD-10 at max is double racked on outboard wing pylons only while C-802 can only be mounted inboard wing pylons. As you said DL pod can go in centerline. Sure we’ll see single ugly load outs with one C-802 missile and a ext tank

Last edited by AeriaGloria; 08-04-2019 at 10:27 PM.
AeriaGloria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2019, 12:05 PM   #412
-P51DMustang-
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 56
Default

Quote:
It is not like link 16 and a SA page
Tiny news update kinda hyped me... It's not link 16 but display look similar to it, far from Russian D/L... Here you can find it. https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php...22&postcount=2
Deka is beeing more and more demonstrative, they seem confident, and i like that.
As you said
Quote:
Sure we’ll see single ugly load outs with one C-802 missile and a ext tank
or no fuel tank depending on fuel efficiency of the beast, but keeping 2x2 SD10 and 2 PL5 is confy...
My only regret is lack of A/G missiles like mavs or else. As i don't really know how good is C802. Also, the fact you can't take D/L AND TGP under the belly since they share same pylons, i think we could get more uggly stuff like DL and TGP under the wings instead SD10, and GBU (i don't know chinese ones name) or C802 un central pylons... ^^

Awfully, it's smaller than F16, so you got 2 wing pylons less, and you can't attach TGP or other pods under belly without loose extra fuel tank, while F16 got 3 pylon under the belly .
Still, in A/A they kinda get same payload so can't wait to see dogfight/fight with those two
-P51DMustang- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2019, 12:16 PM   #413
L0op8ack
3rd Party Developer
 
L0op8ack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: the Forbidden City
Posts: 215
Default

You can use C-701T as small version mav
L0op8ack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2019, 12:56 PM   #414
-P51DMustang-
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 56
Default

Quote:
You can use C-701T as small version mav
Oh ok thanks...
Just to get a clear idea... C701 are kinda like mavs? So 802CM are antiradiation like HARM, 802AK, and LD10 are similar to what nato payload?
Also what are SPJ and LS6?
I'm familiar with NATO (hornet) payloads so you can give an equivalent or same working stuff
Last question, TGP of JF17 is comparable to LANTIRN, Lightning, or sniper?
For the other payloads i find info on web
-P51DMustang- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2019, 04:51 PM   #415
fragal
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 399
Default

I worked through the list a while back and figured the basics of the loadouts and their western equivalents.

GB-500's - LGB probably around GBU24 level
LS6's are your basic jsow jdam glide bomb equivalent
C-802's are your anti ship man in the loop missiles (closest equivalent would be the AGM84 SLAM SLAM-ER)
C-701's are basically baby mavericks probably closer to a hellfire
BRM-1-90's laser guided 90mm rocket pods (chinese apkws)
LD-10's are your ARM's (harms) (SD10's with a passive radar seeker)
PL5's - Aim9m equivalent
SD10A - 120C equivalent

No idea on the TGP though probably closest to a litening on functionality.

Quote:
Originally Posted by -P51DMustang- View Post
Oh ok thanks...
Just to get a clear idea... C701 are kinda like mavs? So 802CM are antiradiation like HARM, 802AK, and LD10 are similar to what nato payload?
Also what are SPJ and LS6?
I'm familiar with NATO (hornet) payloads so you can give an equivalent or same working stuff
Last question, TGP of JF17 is comparable to LANTIRN, Lightning, or sniper?
For the other payloads i find info on web
fragal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2019, 05:39 PM   #416
mehksauce
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fragal View Post
I worked through the list a while back and figured the basics of the loadouts and their western equivalents.


C-701's are basically baby mavericks probably closer to a hellfire

No idea on the TGP though probably closest to a litening on functionality.


is the c-701s coming with the jf-17 dcs ?
mehksauce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2019, 06:05 PM   #417
AeriaGloria
Senior Member
 
AeriaGloria's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: LA
Posts: 1,102
Default

Mustang the DL pod and TGP can go under wings, does not impact the max payload of four SD-10 on outboard pylons. Thanks for the screenshots of the radar, does look like there is an awacs or ewr based DL for air targets. Wonder if it requires DL pod or if it’s a separate internal system than the prodded DL.

The fact that we have so many questions about this plane is going to make it all the more fun on release

From discussion thread— don’t think we’ll get ALCM, but hey we might be surprised!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	43DCFD4A-3A5E-41BB-9034-70990E2233CE.jpeg
Views:	133
Size:	68.7 KB
ID:	215043  

Last edited by AeriaGloria; 08-06-2019 at 06:12 PM.
AeriaGloria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2019, 06:46 PM   #418
fragal
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mehksauce View Post
is the c-701s coming with the jf-17 dcs ?
uboats said a few pages back everything that’s in the loadout chart posted in the updates will be in on release, so guess so yes.
fragal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2019, 06:59 PM   #419
AeriaGloria
Senior Member
 
AeriaGloria's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: LA
Posts: 1,102
Default

That’s this one
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	6C8BE3A0-518A-448A-BA38-F7B58D165A3F.jpeg
Views:	213
Size:	103.5 KB
ID:	215050  
AeriaGloria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2019, 08:22 PM   #420
///Rage
Veteran
 
///Rage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,147
Default

So DL pod or Block II?
__________________

64th "Scorpions" Aggressor Squadron
Discord: 64th Aggressor Squadron
TS: 195.201.110.22
///Rage is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:27 PM. vBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys. Powered by vBulletin®.
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.