I don't think the take-off difficulty is realistic. - Page 6 - ED Forums
 


Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-17-2020, 10:00 PM   #51
Yo-Yo
Staff
 
Yo-Yo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,324
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandcat View Post
Would a BF-109K have more torque than a dora or spitfire? I can easily counter the torque in the dora and spitfire. However in the BF-109 full stick and rudder can't stop it from drifting off to the left.
https://youtu.be/pvKs9VLUcCg?t=939

https://youtu.be/pvKs9VLUcCg?t=1404

https://youtu.be/OaZ6lkqUul4
__________________
Ніщо так сильно не ранить мозок, як уламки скла від розбитих рожевих окулярів
There is nothing so hurtful for the brain as splinters of broken rose-coloured spectacles.
Ничто так сильно не ранит мозг, как осколки стекла от разбитых розовых очков (С) Me

Last edited by Yo-Yo; 09-17-2020 at 10:17 PM.
Yo-Yo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2020, 05:02 AM   #52
grafspee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Poland
Posts: 2,734
Default

Bf-109 well known feature is that tail vertical stabilizer is very small compare to other planes but the tail is significant longer.
This makes two things,
First it is hard to control at low speeds
Second because of the long tail rudder is quite effective at Yawing plane left right so pilot can easy bring aim to make a shoot even if nose is quite off the target left/right
__________________
grafspee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:40 AM. vBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys. Powered by vBulletin®.
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.