SimHQ interview - DCS Q&A with Matt Wagner

Good news there, can't wait to see what it will look like a few years from now.

Thanks,good reading.

Was on a SimHQ server 1-2 days ago, they seemed to be testing some P51D's.

Very interesting.

But I also understood (or is it my imagination) that ED needs money and programmers because (I feel) they are struggling with their projects... Many projects, not enough ressources ($ and devs), so it takes more time.

Correct me if I'm wrong. (constructively)

I really hope ED can receive the support they need.

Anyway, thanks for the infos, Viper. And thanks for the interview, Wags.

Reading the interview it felt like a conversation I was having with my 3 year old daughter. Short consice answers that give nothing new.

So shall we starting taking bets of if Nevada gets released before Dec 31, 2012?

Reading the interview it felt like a conversation I was having with my 3 year old daughter. Short consice answers that give nothing new.

 

So shall we starting taking bets of if Nevada gets released before Dec 31, 2012?

I must agree , he wasnt very talkative.

Why say 10 words when 3 is enough.

The answers were short because everyone of those questions has been answered here on the forum in the past few months. ;)

I'm sorry,I feel a bit disappointed as I thought The Nevada terrain was do out this summer.Bummer!

I must agree , he wasnt very talkative.

I think he has the makings of a Politician. :smartass:

It seemed like a hard interview, I thought it might have been only me.

rattler

I would rather install the Nevada map manually ;) Wouldn´t mind at all if it came before the updater.

I think most everyone also completely missed the announcement of the DCS Auto-Updater that is coming.

I did see it but, no offense intended, that is a convenience item and not essential to any aspect of the sim. Then again, I don't understand the difficulties some have with updating the current products.

Not really. Anytime we announce a new product, it will certainly not be done as part of an interview in another website. It will be done as a proper press release. In terms of the 3rd party questions, we are legally bound by contract as to what we can say about product developed by other developers.

Wags:

Yes perfectly understandable that you can't comment on 3rd Party Developers, that makes perfect sense. You can only speak for Eagle. I understand perfectly that point.:thumbup:

I did see it but, no offense intended, that is a convenience item and not essential to any aspect of the sim. Then again, I don't understand the difficulties some have with updating the current products.

I beg to differ. It's a critical component of a persistent world platform. It'll become even more critical as time goes on and more content is cleared by ED.

Wags:

 

Yes perfectly understandable that you can't comment on 3rd Party Developers, that makes perfect sense. You can only speak for Eagle. I understand perfectly that point.:thumbup:[ There is so much going on now and keep track of these update no.'s is as simple as it sounds, a little difficult, if you understand what I mean. They are all very similar so it gets to be confusing at times keep program updates straight. I don't know maybe with so much going on the interview seemed to be a little short on the answer side. Damned if you do Damned if you don't.LOL:)/QUOTE]

 

 

rattler

The answers were short because everyone of those questions has been answered here on the forum in the past few months. ;)

I want to answer this but not even I can bring myself to do it.

Why say 10 words when 3 is enough.

And those three words are....?

......"when it's done"

Good interview Wags! Answered a few questions I (still) had about DCSW and 3rd Party add-ons.

Other than that, Nevada and FC3 can't come soon enough! :P

I think most everyone also completely missed the announcement of the DCS Auto-Updater that is coming.

Looking forward to it! :thumbup:

kind regards,

Fire