nickos86 Posted June 26, 2018 Share Posted June 26, 2018 When connecting to the tanker the BOOM there is no probe to basket animation. Moreover, there is a very odd boom behavior - it goes up/sides with no reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muehlema Posted June 26, 2018 Share Posted June 26, 2018 Known issue - Use the C130 X-Plane 11.5x / DCS 2.5.6 / P3Dv5 / Aerofly FS 2 / War Thunder Win10-x64 | ASUS Z390 Maximus VI | Intel i7-9700K @3.6GHz | Corsair Vengeance LPX 32 GB DDR4 | 6TB SSD Samsung 850 Pro | 2TB M2 PCI 4x | ASUS GTX 1080 ROG STRIX 8GB DDR5X | TM Hotas Warthog | Saitek Combat Pedals | Oculus Rift S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spartanbzh Posted July 9, 2018 Share Posted July 9, 2018 And, how the hell are we supposed to do that ? C130 have only basket refueling system. Oly Oly Oxen Free. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jojo Posted July 9, 2018 Share Posted July 9, 2018 And, how the hell are we supposed to do that ? C130 have only basket refueling system. And this is the system used by the 2 current Razbam modules: AV-8B Harrier II and M-2000C. KC-130 is doing fine, just a little slow for M-2000C. Razbam tried to make KC-135 BDA, with a basket attached at the end of the boom, like frequently used on French C-135FR. But DCS World code isn’t working with this system for now. Waiting for KC-135 with wing pod. KC-135 already exist in DCS World for F-15C and A-10 :smilewink: Mirage fanatic ! I7-7700K/ MSI RTX3080/ RAM 64 Go/ SSD / TM Hornet stick-Virpil WarBRD + Virpil CM3 Throttle + MFG Crosswind + Reverb G2. Flickr gallery: https://www.flickr.com/gp/71068385@N02/728Hbi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AG-51_Razor Posted July 16, 2018 Share Posted July 16, 2018 Is the problem with the KC-135 the same thing as the Tarawa, it's an ED issue that is out of RAZBAM's control?? Just wondering if anyone has seen anything on these boards about this. Just curious, no big deal. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doum76 Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 Is the problem with the KC-135 the same thing as the Tarawa, it's an ED issue that is out of RAZBAM's control?? Just wondering if anyone has seen anything on these boards about this. Just curious, no big deal. Thing is this thread is sorta a duplicates from the folowing: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=209168 And the reason not working is sorta mentionned on this post: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3529237&postcount=27 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pimp Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 Thing is this thread is sorta a duplicates from the folowing: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=209168 And the reason not working is sorta mentionned on this post: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3529237&postcount=27 I believe that is what Razor is trying to find out. Is the issues with the Tarawa ED's problem or Razbam's? i9 9900k @5.1GHz NZXT Kraken |Asus ROG Strix Z390 E-Gaming | Samsung NVMe m.2 970 Evo 1TB | LPX 64GB DDR4 3200MHz EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 Ultra | Reverb G1 | HOTAS Warthog | Saitek Flight Pedals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joey45 Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 ED I believe. The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance. "Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.." https://ko-fi.com/joey45 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doum76 Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 I believe that is what Razor is trying to find out. Is the issues with the Tarawa ED's problem or Razbam's? As the link i posted said, it's ED's to find a solution in sorta way at least they are the one of the case, as a single aircraft cannot share a refueling point for both system on the same model at the same spot. I'll simply copy/paste what's writen in what i'Ve linked above in case people doesn't wanna click and still ask. From the Razbam's facebook page: " There seems to be an internal DCS problem with the KC135BDA. Apparently DCS cannot reliable determine the basket position for a tanker using both boom and basket in the same refueling point, which is what the KC135BDA uses. ED is looking at the problem and will create custom functions for handling such setup." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macedk Posted July 22, 2018 Share Posted July 22, 2018 Thanks for the info....:) OS: Win10 home 64bit*MB: Asus Strix Z270F/ CPU: Intel I7 7700k /Ram:32gb_ddr4 GFX: Nvidia Asus 1080 8Gb Mon: Asus vg2448qe 24" Disk: SSD Stick: TM Warthog #1400/Saitek pro pedals/TIR5/TM MFDs [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackdaw Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 Is the KC135BDA fixed, if it is could someone share some pictures Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nooch Posted August 19, 2018 Share Posted August 19, 2018 No, it still isn't. Tested yesterday. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmilingBandit Posted August 24, 2018 Share Posted August 24, 2018 I’d just be happy with putting MPRS pods on a 135. While working the Iron Maiden would be fun, I’d just like to have some big gas in the air until they can get the BDA working. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Britchot Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 I’d just be happy with putting MPRS pods on a 135. While working the Iron Maiden would be fun, I’d just like to have some big gas in the air until they can get the BDA working. +1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] CPU - Intel 8088 @ 4.77 MHz; Memory - 128KB; 360KB double-sided 5 1/4" full-height floppy disk drive; 10MB Seagate ST-412 hard drive JG-1 MiG-21bis Checklist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silvern Posted August 28, 2018 Share Posted August 28, 2018 I’d just be happy with putting MPRS pods on a 135. While working the Iron Maiden would be fun, I’d just like to have some big gas in the air until they can get the BDA working. Same here. If it works on Il-78 and KC-130, it ought to work on 135. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dun_Aenghus Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Any idea if this has been fixed in the latest update? It would be great to finally have the 135BDA working with the drogue. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tackle Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 What would be the advantage over the C-130? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jojo Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 What would be the advantage over the C-130? KC-135 can fly higher & faster and deliver more fuel. For instance the preferential speed to refuel Mirage 2000 is 300kt CAS. KC-130 can't fly that fast, we are around 230kt. Mirage fanatic ! I7-7700K/ MSI RTX3080/ RAM 64 Go/ SSD / TM Hornet stick-Virpil WarBRD + Virpil CM3 Throttle + MFG Crosswind + Reverb G2. Flickr gallery: https://www.flickr.com/gp/71068385@N02/728Hbi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrl11 Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Not fixed, just tried it. 1st vAEW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dun_Aenghus Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 What would be the advantage over the C-130? It would also be nice to have a French Airforce tanker to pair with the Mirage. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tackle Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 Totally forgot about the Mirage :) KC-135 can fly higher & faster and deliver more fuel. For instance the preferential speed to refuel Mirage 2000 is 300kt CAS. KC-130 can't fly that fast, we are around 230kt. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silvern Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 Totally forgot about the Mirage :) It would also be better for F-14 and F/A-18. Any probe & drogue fast je pretty much would be better off with a KC-135. Has RAZBAM acknowledged this KC-135 issue yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jojo Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 It would also be better for F-14 and F/A-18. Any probe & drogue fast je pretty much would be better off with a KC-135. Has RAZBAM acknowledged this KC-135 issue yet? Yes, but it seems DCS doesn’t like a basket attached to a moving boom. Mirage fanatic ! I7-7700K/ MSI RTX3080/ RAM 64 Go/ SSD / TM Hornet stick-Virpil WarBRD + Virpil CM3 Throttle + MFG Crosswind + Reverb G2. Flickr gallery: https://www.flickr.com/gp/71068385@N02/728Hbi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silvern Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 Yes, but it seems DCS doesn’t like a basket attached to a moving boom. So it's out of their hands... What about KC-135 MPRS? Is it still planned? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jojo Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 So it's out of their hands... What about KC-135 MPRS? Is it still planned? I don’t know, but it’s incredible that with Hornet out ED didn’t provide us a NATO jet tanker. S-3 is old ugly model, with low capacity. Mirage fanatic ! I7-7700K/ MSI RTX3080/ RAM 64 Go/ SSD / TM Hornet stick-Virpil WarBRD + Virpil CM3 Throttle + MFG Crosswind + Reverb G2. Flickr gallery: https://www.flickr.com/gp/71068385@N02/728Hbi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts