TWC_SLAG Posted May 31, 2017 Author Share Posted May 31, 2017 Not true. The LW was more active than just that one famous flight on D-Day. At least 9 LW units flew missions in the Normandy area. I watched the video. My take is this: For our purposes, it seems that, in SP missions, a lot of scenarios are possible. But, for MP, the choices are more limited. How do you put German airfields on the map? You can't put them on any of the fields near the beach head. Where do you then put the Allied fields, except in England. The only answer seems to be German a/c can only start in the air at some distance from the beach head. Far enough away that they are not immediately attacked. What we have being Alpha, maybe some ideas will surface with time. No disrespect to anyone at ED, but this map, right now, seems to be much more oriented toward the Allies, with less thought for what the people flying 109/190's are supposed to do. TWC_SLAG Win 10 64 bit, 2T Hard Drive, 1T SSD, 500GB SSD, ASUS Prime Z390 MB, Intel i9 9900 Coffee Lake 3.1mhz CPU, ASUS 2070 Super GPU, 32gb DDR4 Ram, Track IR5, 32” Gigabyte curved monitor, TM Warthog HOTAS, CH Pedals, Voice Attack, hp Reverb G2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pikey Posted May 31, 2017 Share Posted May 31, 2017 We've had A-10C's in Georgia the last 5 years, humbly, I don't see MP being limited by the strict time period as much as SP myself. I'm sure opinions will differ person to person on that. I watched the video. My take is this: For our purposes, it seems that, in SP missions, a lot of scenarios are possible. But, for MP, the choices are more limited. How do you put German airfields on the map? You can't put them on any of the fields near the beach head. Where do you then put the Allied fields, except in England. The only answer seems to be German a/c can only start in the air at some distance from the beach head. Far enough away that they are not immediately attacked. What we have being Alpha, maybe some ideas will surface with time. No disrespect to anyone at ED, but this map, right now, seems to be much more oriented toward the Allies, with less thought for what the people flying 109/190's are supposed to do. ___________________________________________________________________________ SIMPLE SCENERY SAVING * SIMPLE GROUP SAVING * SIMPLE STATIC SAVING * Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flare2000x Posted May 31, 2017 Share Posted May 31, 2017 Why can't we have just some additional fields to the south or east so we can have missions where the Germans can actually take off further away from the battle area... Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] DCS:WWII 1944 BACKER --- Fw. 190D-9 --- Bf. 109K-4 --- P-51D --- Spitfire! Specs: Intel i7-3770 @3.9 Ghz - NVidia GTX 960 - 8GB RAM - OCz Vertex 240GB SSD - Toshiba 1TB HDD - Corsair CX 600M Power Supply - MSI B75MA-P45 MoBo - Defender Cobra M5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy1966 Posted May 31, 2017 Share Posted May 31, 2017 Its still Alpha WIP, there are plans for grass runways you can place anywhere and make an airfield. I personally haven't tried yet, its still Wip , its in the editer ,patience grasshopper We are Virtual Pilots, a growing International Squad of pilots, we fly Allies in WWII and Red Force in Korea and Modern combat. We are recruiting like minded people of all Nationalities and skill levels. http://virtual-pilots.com/ [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TWC_SLAG Posted June 1, 2017 Author Share Posted June 1, 2017 Why can't we have just some additional fields to the south or east so we can have missions where the Germans can actually take off further away from the battle area... Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk Exactly. Tonight, I flew south as far as our map would go, and there was lots of "map" further on. Our map ends just south of Pommville. There is plenty of map to the east, also. We have voiced our opinions, and preferences. Now, let's give ED a chance to maybe make some changes in the Beta, or Final version. TWC_SLAG Win 10 64 bit, 2T Hard Drive, 1T SSD, 500GB SSD, ASUS Prime Z390 MB, Intel i9 9900 Coffee Lake 3.1mhz CPU, ASUS 2070 Super GPU, 32gb DDR4 Ram, Track IR5, 32” Gigabyte curved monitor, TM Warthog HOTAS, CH Pedals, Voice Attack, hp Reverb G2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xvii-Dietrich Posted July 29, 2018 Share Posted July 29, 2018 I know this is an old thread, but my reply is a direct follow on from the discussion here. And the necessary research has taken me a LONG time. --- There are only four airfields on the DCS Normandy map, which were ever used by the Germans. These are: Cherbourg-Maupetus -- effectively bombed to destruction by the Allies on 22-May-1944. It was captured then rebuilt by the Allies between 26-Jun and 04-Jul-1944 and then used as ALG A-15. Caen-Carpiquet -- runway demolished by the Luftwaffe on 06-Jun-1944 and infrastructure by 17-Jun-1944. It was captured by Anglo-Canadian Forces on 09-Jul-1944 and was operational again by 08-Aug-1944 as ALG B-17. Lessay -- was permanently obstructed by the Luftwaffe on 27-Apr-1944. US Forces captured the field on 16-Jul-1944. It was re-built between 01-Aug-1944 and 25-Aug-1944 after which it was used for B-26 bombers as ALG A-20. Évreux -- used during June and July by LW units. Bombed on 13, 15 and 25-June. Last unit (Stab./JG3) left on 05-Jul-1944. Base abandonned in early August. Basically, the only valid post-D-Day German airfield is Évreux. All other fields were Allied only. The presence of Meautis A-17 limits the date of the map. Construction of Meautis started 24-Jul-1944 and it was operational 17-Aug-1944. In other words, the dateline of the Normandy map must be at least 24-Jul-1944 (if not later) and by that time even Évreux was no longer in use. Thus, at the moment, it is impossible to have an historically correct map with both Allied and Axis airfields. Solution 1. Remove Biniville, Brucheville, Lingerolles and Meautis. This will move the dateline for the map forward (making it consistent with Epson and Charnwood) and thus making the use of Évreux appropriate. Solution 2. Add some more Luftwaffe airfields that are appropriate for the late-July / early-August dateline. Solution 3. Provide a "static airfield object" (like a FARP), which Mission Builders can place on the map. This will give the greatest flexibility and allow for the most historical missions. The above is the basis of a long research project. The full article, with all data, references, maps, etc. is available here: https://www.stormofwar.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=56&t=6813 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAD-MM Posted July 29, 2018 Share Posted July 29, 2018 JG 5 Ice See Fighters where also on Evreux in June... All other LW Units where outside of the Map Boundary, closest was JG2 somewhere so far I remember... Once you have tasted Flight, you will forever walk the Earth with your Eyes turned Skyward. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 9./JG27 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rel4y Posted July 29, 2018 Share Posted July 29, 2018 I posted all of this info right after map release and nothing changed so far. Therefore I doubt anything will change in future to make this map credible in any way. Well germans had a few more strips held till July/August which would be suitable for inclusion, just to make the map more usable for non airquake and actual missions. It would be highly beneficial for mission design based around the Invasion if these airfelds were present. These include: Argentan Conches St Andre de-l'Eure Marcilly la Campagne Damville Creton I think barely any of these were german before and only one was active on D-Day. Lessay was german but never active. Carpiquet was german but not active in 44. Maupertus was abandoned in May 44 and likely inactive since 43. Evreux being the only active Luftwaffe field during the invasion currently on the map. Here is some info on the allied airfields. Most of these were only in use during the Normandy campaign. The airfields that opened the latest date to 25. August 44 and the earliest closed airfields to 21. August 44. Maupertus Opened: 4 July 1944 Closed: 22 December 1944 Azeville Opened: 24 June 1944 Closed: 15 September 1944 Biniville Opened: 17 July 1944 Closed: 21 August 1944 Picauville Opened: 26 June 1944 Closed: 15 September 1944 Beuzeville Opened: 12 June 1944 Closed: 18 September 1944 Cretteville Opened: 4 July 1944 Closed: 5 September 1944 Brucheville Opened: 2 August 1944 Closed: 5 September 1944 Meautis Opened: 17 August 1944 Closed: 7 September 1944 Lessay Opened: 25 August 1944 Closed: 28 September 1944 Cardonville Opened: 14 June 1944 Closed: 1 September 1944 Deux-Jumeaux Opened: 30 June 1944 Closed: 15 September 1944 Saint-Pierre-du-Mont Opened: 13 June 1944 Closed: 5 September 1944 Cricqueville Opened: 16 June 1944 Closed: 15 September 1944 Saint-Laurent-sur-Mer Opened: 8 June Closed: 25 August 1944 Chippelle Opened: 5 July 1944 Closed: 5 September 1944 Le Molay Opened: 30 June 1944 Closed: 5 October 1944 Lignerolles Opened: 18 July 1944 Closed: 4 November 1944 Longues-sur-Mer Opened: 26 June 1944 Closed: 4 September 1944 Sommervieu Opened: 22 June 1944 Closed: August 1945 St. Croix-sur-Mer Opened: 10 June 1944 Closed: 4 September 1944 Bazenville Opened: 11 June 1944 Closed: 28 August 1944 Lantheuil Opened: 27 June 1944 Closed: 30 August 1944 Carpiquet Opened: 25 August 1944 Cougar, CH and Saitek PnP hall sensor kits + shift registers: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=220916 Shapeways store for DIY flight simming equipment and repair: https://www.shapeways.com/shops/rel4y-diy-joystick-flight-simming Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert31178 Posted July 29, 2018 Share Posted July 29, 2018 And even though it's a small map it takes for frickin' forever to get anywhere in a warbird...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED Team NineLine Posted July 29, 2018 ED Team Share Posted July 29, 2018 I posted all of this info right after map release and nothing changed so far. Therefore I doubt anything will change in future to make this map credible in any way. I dont think the credibility comment was needed, that said, we have a pretty powerful Mission Editor, you can do a lot of things, including not using airfields if you dont want to. And many other things to make and use the map how you wish. Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted July 29, 2018 Share Posted July 29, 2018 Solution 3. Provide a "static airfield object" (like a FARP), which Mission Builders can place on the map. This will give the greatest flexibility and allow for the most historical missions. On DCS has a "never" complete static airfield on mission editor, under Static object > grass airfield > grass airfield. That missing the runway object and the proper implementation to work into the simulator. Was added at same time of Normandy map. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED Team NineLine Posted July 30, 2018 ED Team Share Posted July 30, 2018 On DCS has a "never" complete static airfield on mission editor, under Static object > grass airfield > grass airfield. That missing the runway object and the proper implementation to work into the simulator. Was added at same time of Normandy map. Yeah, I need to chase that down and see where the hold up on that is. Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ercoupe Posted July 30, 2018 Share Posted July 30, 2018 dont think the credibility comment was needed, that said, we have a pretty powerful Mission Editor, you can do a lot of things, including not using airfields if you dont want to. And many other things to make and use the map how you wish. __________________ I think that people get way too redicuous about this stuff. I'm a big aviation history buff with a large aviation library to prove it....but I still say "who cares?" Use what ever field you want. Call it whatever the hell you want. Fly the Spit from it, fly the Mustang from it....hell, fly the 109 from it. You all need to stop taking this shit too seriously. I'm just enjoying the hell out of that Spitfire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts