Jump to content

A-7E


bC3660

Recommended Posts

I’m pretty sure Razbam is making that one.

ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW

(Core i7-9750H, RTX 2070, 32 GB ram)

TM Warthog - TM T-Flight Pedals - TrackIr 5 - Cougar MFD

 

Modules

F-86F - T.1A - A-10C - M-2000C - UH-1 - F-5 - P-51 - SA342 - Spitfire - AJS-37 - AV-8B - F/A-18C - L-39 - MiG-21 - MiG-15 - KA-50

FC3 - CA - NTTR - Normandy - WWII AP - LotATC - TacView

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought Razbam was making the A-6 too. But now Heatblur is making it. I think that Heatblur would do a better job on the A-7 also.

 

Razbam is a good dev, and they already have an A-7E for FSX. I don't think getting their A-7 done will be as large of a process for them as it would be for anyone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A RAZBAM A-7 would be a first day buy for me!! :thumbup: Their Harrier has been nothing less than spectacular despite what some folks may think about the progress of the early access development. The A-7 will be absolutely AWESOME!!


Edited by AG-51_Razor
spelling

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes! I love the SLUF!!!

 

Their Harrier has been nothing less that spectacular despite what some folks may think about the progress of the early access development.

 

For a moment, I thought I read "Their Harrier has been nothing that spectacular" and I nearly responded by saying, "Funny. That's what a lot of people concluded about the real-life Harrier!!!" :megalol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The real life harrier was spectacular and had a very good combat record. It was a 1960’s design.

harrier landing GIFRYZEN 7 3700X Running at 4.35 GHz

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080Ti

32gb DDR4 RAM @3200 MHz

Oculus CV1 NvME 970 EVO

TM Warthog Stick & Throttle plus 11" extension. VKB T-Rudder MKIV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Razbam is a good dev, and they already have an A-7E for FSX. I don't think getting their A-7 done will be as large of a process for them as it would be for anyone else.

Razbam announced dozen of modules, and keep announcing new modules every month. Plus they concentrating on Falklands now. I don't think A7's turn will come anytime soon in next 5 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Razbam announced dozen of modules, and keep announcing new modules every month. Plus they concentrating on Falklands now. I don't think A7's turn will come anytime soon in next 5 years.

 

If Heatblur is taking the A-6, I wouldn't be surprised if they released along a similar time frame honestly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am more interested in the A7 Corsair II than the A6 intruder. One thing is, A6 don't have gun (A7 has more hi cap gun) and not a good HUD display. When compared. The A7 has better features and is more marketable...Then there is the twin seat making A6 a bit more harder to create.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am more interested in the A7 Corsair II than the A6 intruder. One thing is, A6 don't have gun (A7 has more hi cap gun) and not a good HUD display. When compared. The A7 has better features and is more marketable...Then there is the twin seat making A6 a bit more harder to create.

 

The A-6 was 100% a superior medium to heavy attack aircraft. The A-7 was good, but there is a reason it was replaced as quickly as it was, where the A-6 soldiered on for nearly a decade more

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the A 7 was a Fighter turned into an attacker as a stop gap till a propper all weather dedicated attack aircaft was developed, and that is what sets apparte the Intruder: its a day/night all weather dedicated attack aircraft.

 

....kind of...

 

The A-7 was a development of the F-8. It was intended to replace the A-4 as the Navy light attack platform.

 

It was never a stop gap..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm actually OK with A6...

 

 

The single seat A7E would be much easier to make for Heatblur when compared with a much complicated A6E. But they seem to have confirmed for an AI A6, which is good. Still, as it is, they are already loaded with more work. I still believe the A7 would be much easier to work for them as its a single seater. Its upto Heatblur to make the final decision on what to make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're overcomitted and under-delivering lately.

 

The list of modules they want to do is way too ambitious for only having two coders.

 

Agree and disagree

 

I think they have a set out schedule of what they want. If you look at that and expect a "finish from announce date" being the same for each module, then they're going to disappoint. I think a lot of what they announced is "to do in the future." However, I also think that maybe this is having the good effect of pushing other devs forward (especially if Heatblur does "take" the A-6 from them).

 

However, it does leave open the question of whether or not they support their finished modules. Looking at the Mirage, it's a great jet that's widely liked. It did take time to get there, but it's there. The Harrier will get there, and so on.

 

They really do need to bring on a couple more coders, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, each module will take around 3-5 years develop and the more complicated the module is, its going to take even longer. Which is why I suggested the A7, a single seater and not that complex...at least when compared with A6.

 

 

 

The Harrier is also a complex jet...with its special ability. Its going to take a looong while till its operational with campaigns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Razbam is a good dev, and they already have an A-7E for FSX. I don't think getting their A-7 done will be as large of a process for them as it would be for anyone else.

 

They also have the AV8 for FSX, and going on over 11months now and output has turned into a crawl. I read alot about the A7 and was a cool airframe for the time. I would only hope ED or HB rocks it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They also have the AV8 for FSX, and going on over 11months now and output has turned into a crawl. I read alot about the A7 and was a cool airframe for the time. I would only hope ED or HB rocks it.

 

 

 

 

Now imagine that with the A6 as full fidelity project and that is a very complex aircraft. Its better to do it as AI model for now.

 

 

 

A7 seems better when compared with modeling a fresh 2 seat (side by side). I can see how long the F-14 is taking and that's two seat too. Good thing is F-14 will have even more better sales.

 

 

 

A6 in an emergency chance moment cannot go air to air...eg: like you see a slow air to air mover and you happen to be nearby (sidewinders are easily spoofed). A7 has a gun and thats better sales, its got good ground pounding abilities too. Not bad...Its even a bit more faster are agile than A6.

 

 

 

As we all know a module in DCS (full fidelity) takes around 3-5 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

does razbam only have the right to make the a-7e now that they have announced it or whatever they did because I was thinking of making one myself (obviously with a team) and going 3rd party somehow. Aso if you would like to help with my project pm me :helpsmilie:

______________________________________________________

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G GTX 1050 3GB 8GB Ram 'Beauty MATE' :thumbup:

Owner of PROJECT TORNADO https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=221698 :helpsmilie:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean I know they have announced it but it will def be another few years till they make it. meh.

I might try to find another plane to dedicate my time to


Edited by djokerslam6

______________________________________________________

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G GTX 1050 3GB 8GB Ram 'Beauty MATE' :thumbup:

Owner of PROJECT TORNADO https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=221698 :helpsmilie:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...